Started By
Message

re: Zuckerberg’s CTCL had the night of her life in CO. Came from 15 points down and won by 20

Posted on 7/2/22 at 9:48 am to
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 9:48 am to
quote:

quote:
JJJJJ, the zealous advocate of 1st Amendment rights.



Lack of understanding of the 1st.
wait, 1st Amendment allows massive cheating?

who knew? and just look at the proponent of such inane bullshite...

..the weaselly piece of shite
This post was edited on 7/2/22 at 9:49 am
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 9:50 am to
quote:

story hour
You seem oddly obsessed with misrepresenting my views.

I said repeatedly that I would not take my children to attend these events. I simply defended the rights of parents who see the matter differently to make their own decisions.

I want parents to have the right to make decisions on behalf of their own children. Apparently, you want the State to do so.

Why do you love the Nanny State and hate freedom so much?

Yes, yes, you are a SoCon, and that is what SoCons do.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48096 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 9:52 am to
quote:

It is the exact playbook said over and over and over by Republicans. It gets old really fast.


This was a republican primary, moron. Inconsistencies should be investigated in elections. Especially with all of the proven fraud as of late.
Posted by EasterEgg
New Orleans Metro
Member since Sep 2018
4810 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 9:54 am to
So Zuckerberg planted overseer of future Colorado elections... geez, they must have been worried Colorado was going to turn into a swing state.

It they are going to brazenly cheat and we do nothing, the Republic is dead.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 9:55 am to
You said he should be “silenced.”. You said nothing about “cheating,” so my reply did not address that issue either.

The 1st Amendment protects his right to voice his opinions, and your explicit desire to “silence” him exposes real 1st Amendment concerns.
quote:

massive cheating?
A completely different issue. If he is breaking the law, he should be prosecuted.

Why do you hate the 1st Amendment?
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 9:56 am to
quote:

AggieHank86
why are you ALWAYS a weaselly piece of shite?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 9:58 am to
quote:

are you ALWAYS a weaselly piece of shite?
No, just far better than you at debate.

Hint: it comes from having the mental capacity to consider more than one thought at a time.
This post was edited on 7/2/22 at 9:59 am
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67657 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 10:04 am to
quote:

couldn't possibly be that voters were turned off by the fact that Peters was an election denier


Could be. Unless the system is auditable, we will never know.

I still stand by my position that in a world where just about everything is corrupt, it's more reasonable to presume that our election systems are corrupt than the opposite.
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 10:06 am to
quote:

No, just far better than you at debate.

You are mistaking debate with yammering away at being a weaselly piece of shite..

...which you definitely are
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90498 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 10:22 am to
And people think the midterms will go our way.

They’re going to blatantly steal it. What will you do about it? Will you people finally wake up and decide the country is worth fighting for or continue to bend over and take it
Posted by Tigers2010a
Member since Jul 2021
3627 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 10:22 am to
Raffensburger winning the recent Georgia SOS surprised the hell out of me too. Makes me wonder what we would find if we looked closer.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90498 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 10:26 am to
The real question is why make it so blatant? Why not have her win by 1-2%?

Nobody believes this shite. I think they’ll be more bold in the midterms because they want violence
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
30382 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 10:28 am to
quote:

And people think the midterms will go our way.


I only hope the turnout is so big they cannot cheat enough to overcome it.

I still cringe at the never Trump conservatives that refuse to acknowledge the cheating. Their hatred has clouded their judgment.
Posted by tiggerfan02 2021
HSV
Member since Jan 2021
2875 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 12:20 pm to
He claims to be a lawyer,
Need I say more?
Posted by Edmt
77436
Member since Mar 2022
370 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 12:35 pm to
Another reason why Colorado vs Texas debate is silly. At least in Texas, there are still enough(sometimes) reasonable people.

Colorado is infected with the democrat disease. Any clown who wants to move to Colorado from Texas has my blessings and help if needed. GTFO.
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
26774 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 12:35 pm to
This is a dry run.

Prepare for a wave.....just not the one we think.
Posted by LakeCharles
USA
Member since Oct 2016
5049 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

If that choice of terminology does not make you question the objectivity of the author, you have just confirmed that you too lack any objectivity at all.

There is always bias. Know it going in. If you were to ask the author if they had a bias I would think they would say "yes". The article also presents real data. Now do the "unbiased" msm.

Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23141 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Yes, one of us is a buffoon.


Yes, as I said. You.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56365 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

It couldn't possibly be that voters were turned off by the fact that Peters was an election denier who stole election data, was arrested and faces trial?


When you say stole election data, you mean took a backup of the election system that was about to be erased?

Why did you feel the need to misrepresent that?
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39103 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Is the info in the article incorrect? No.

How do you know the info in the article is correct? Because it fits your narrative?

This was just a primary. The general election will pit a democrat against the republican winner, and the democrat will be favored. Why would they cheat to get a preferred republican when they could easily (apparently) cheat in the general election and get their democrat in? But wait! No need to cheat; the democrat would be heavily favored to win statewide in Colorado.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram