- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WSJ: Friend Rejects Claim That Ford Helped Her on Polygraph Test
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:11 am to Wolf Messing
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:11 am to Wolf Messing
quote:Or they could be tired of bull shart time wasting tactics used by hyper-partisans to the detriment of the congress and scotus.
They are either worried about what maybe found, or worried they are going to lose both the House and the Senate in the midterms, so which is it?
0
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:12 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
They likely only have one mutual friend who took a polygraph. It's not rocket science.
Oh, so you admit that Ford helped this mutual friend with her polygraph? Thanks for clarifying.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:12 am to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
I’m sure everyone here cares what you think
the day I get affirmation here, is the day I fail at being a decent human being.....
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:12 am to tigerinDC09
Once again we're back to he said/she said. What's good for the goose is good for the gander....I believe HIM!
This entire Democratic house of cards built on someone's word against someone else's word...and NO physical evidence.
It will soon tumble.
This entire Democratic house of cards built on someone's word against someone else's word...and NO physical evidence.
It will soon tumble.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:13 am to CharlesLSU
quote:Clinton? Because I'm certain Trump said "They let you do it." implying consent.
well, its not quite as seedy as a married dude raw-doggin' a porn queen or walking around grabbing the genitals of unwilling, married females. he wouldn't have a problem with sexual assault, his schtick is based on it.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:13 am to Rebel
quote:
For fricks Sake Charles. The FBI does background checks.
They don’t investigate crimes.
How many times do you people need to be reminded of this?
Hey, leave my man Charles alone. He don’t need any more Trumpcuckins telling him how politics work and what it do. Stop being mean to him and hurting his feelings.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:13 am to CharlesLSU
quote:That happened long ago when you became a leech democrat.
the day I fail at being a decent human being.....
This post was edited on 10/3/18 at 10:15 am
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:14 am to CharlesLSU
quote:
lol.....brah, this board is 99% Trumpcuckins with their heads so far up their political asses, they've beaten gravity.
There aren't even 50% "trumpcuckins" in this thread you fricking idiot.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:14 am to Wolf Messing
quote:
The longer the investigation goes the more nervous the repubs are getting.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:14 am to tigerinDC09
I'm shocked someone who possibly gamed the system wouldn't admit to gaming the system.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:14 am to VOR
quote:
Is the DT Circle Jerk anything like the devil’striangle?
Pretty similar. They both mean something stupid to liberals.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:15 am to CharlesLSU
quote:
brah, this board is 99% Trumpcuckins
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:15 am to Jake88
quote:
Trump said "They let you do it." implying consent.
…...whoa.....so all it takes is the assailant asserting they "let me do it"?
And, CLinton? I thought DT was in office.....
How's this now about Clinton?
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:15 am to CharlesLSU
quote:
the day I get affirmation here, is the day I fail at being a decent human being.....
Of course, you’re a democrat. You don’t know nothing about no corruption or scheming to get more power from the people and taking unnecessary rights like the 1st amendment and the 2nd amendment away. You a good ole boy and much more better than us heathens.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:17 am to CharlesLSU
You love Clinton and we know he's a predator. Trump is a philanderer, which isn't good, but it's not being a predator.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:17 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
The friend wasn't identified in the ex-boyfriend's letter, but Dr. Ford's legal team said Ms. McLean was the woman.
How would Ford’s team know who the woman was if it wasn’t true that she was assisting her?
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:17 am to tigerinDC09
quote:We'll just take the word of the DNC appointed "pro bono" activist lawyers seen on camera taking a stuffed envelope from a Dem Senator that THIS particular "friend" is THE unnamed letter person.
The friend wasn't identified in the ex-boyfriend's letter, but Dr. Ford's legal team said Ms. McLean was the woman.
How many bridges would you like to buy? And is this a "to go" order? Sign on the dotted line for that prime farmland southeast of Miami Fl. about 20 miles.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:18 am to The Pirate King
The friend was identified in the letter, the reporter got it wrong. Surprise.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:19 am to Toddy
quote:
No way the ex-boyfriend could possibly have a grudge or anything
So he's gonna risk jail time lying about her because he's an ex boyfriend?
?????
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:19 am to The Pirate King
quote:
How would Ford’s team know who the woman was if it wasn’t true that she was assisting her?
"Well, we went to the woman to whom Ford gave advice about polygraphs and she agree to state that she has not been given advice about polygraphs...and, we gave her a polygraph...she was truthfulish"
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News