- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would you vaccinate against cancer
Posted on 1/21/25 at 11:39 pm to TerryDawg03
Posted on 1/21/25 at 11:39 pm to TerryDawg03
quote:
If they can cure cancer and do it properly, hell yes.
They’ve been having a cure. Ivermectin & Fenbendazole
Posted on 1/21/25 at 11:42 pm to SlidellCajun
I'm listening to Dr. Mary's Monkey as I peruse this board, so no!
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:24 am to Swazla
So what is your opposition to mRNA ?
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:26 am to SlidellCajun
quote:That's not really what they're doing.
Trumps got these tech guys working on a deal to create designer vaccines to administer to people to vaccinate against cancer
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:27 am to SlidellCajun
Maybe after 20 years on the market and proof of its effectiveness. If I have that amount of time.
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:28 am to SlidellCajun
If it's tested and effective, of course I would
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:28 am to SlidellCajun
If Biden would have proposed this, no. Trump? Yes.
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:30 am to SlidellCajun
YES....
..... but only after it was tested/vetted with years long term effect data, and only because i have already had cancer, and chemo is a bitch,,,,,,
..... but only after it was tested/vetted with years long term effect data, and only because i have already had cancer, and chemo is a bitch,,,,,,
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:30 am to SlidellCajun
Where are all the purebloods?
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:31 am to SlidellCajun
Absolutely! This would truly be a miracle from God.
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:31 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
That's not really what they're doing.
I watched the press conference and that is what they said. Larry Ellison said
Once we gene sequence the cancer tumor, they can design a vaccine for each person.
Can you clarify it for us?
This post was edited on 1/22/25 at 8:40 am
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:31 am to SaturatedPhat
quote:
After proper testing and not under a mandate, if it is effective, yes. Cancer is a killer.
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:36 am to Jack Ruby
quote:
Thare are already remedies out there that kill most cancer, even late stage for about $100-200/mo.
The medical cartel just doesn't want you to know about them.
The fact that this has more downvotes than up shows how ignorant most people still are. They are still brainwashed by the medical industry and big pharma to think that Rockefeller medicine is about making you healthy.
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:37 am to conservativewifeymom
the hpv vax is supposed to stop sexually transmitted cancers.
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:41 am to Allister Fiend
Amen! Unless you've walked a ton of miles in the shoes of patients and their families, you have no standing to criticize or act like an expert.
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:48 am to Swazla
quote:
There is no way anyone, ANYONE, should ever allow foreign Mrna in your body. Mrna tell your DNA how it expresses itself....what to do or be.
Call your representative. Call the White House. Call Bobby Kennedy Jr. Keep it out of your body!!!
Seriously though, I know where you're coming from. But, at least in some cases, mRNA will prove to not be the boogeyman. Especially those interventions where rollout will be unrushed, with smaller demand, and a slowly evolving or nonevolving target.
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:55 am to SlidellCajun
quote:Meaning the patient already has malignant cells on board. mRNA proteins would signal, identify or target those Ca Cells.
Once we gene sequence the cancer tumor
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:57 am to SaintsReportExile
quote:
With proper randomized control trials for testing and at least 10 years worth of data.
Great position for someone 40 or under. At 62, I might not have 10 years before cancer strikes. The probabilities change my calculus. Also, at my age there is less time for side effects to mature.
Posted on 1/22/25 at 8:59 am to omegaman66
quote:
It is a simple question
He’s a pro vaccine nut don’t engage him.
Posted on 1/22/25 at 9:00 am to This GUN for HIRE
quote:
If Vance said it was safe. He's the vaccine skeptic.
Not if Vance or anyone else said it's "safe". Man is untrustworthy.
The only authority on that subject is GOD. I would have to pray often and wait for a very definitive answer before ever injecting myself with DNA-manipulating shots.
Popular
Back to top


0







