- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woke pro-abortionist takes a shot at Clarence Thomas on Twitter. It doesn't go well
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:34 pm to Frank Black
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:34 pm to Frank Black
Some disgusting, ugly, hateful people these baby killers.
I have admired Justice Clarence Thomas from the day I saw him battling accusations of sexual impropriety during his Senate Confirmation Hearings.
I have admired Justice Clarence Thomas from the day I saw him battling accusations of sexual impropriety during his Senate Confirmation Hearings.
This post was edited on 6/25/22 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 6/25/22 at 1:55 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
Studies show people that feel the need to play devil’s advocate on every single topic known to man have mental issues. You should get checked out.
Posted on 6/25/22 at 2:01 pm to texastornado
Oppositional defiance?
They also don’t admit to lying.
They also don’t admit to lying.
Posted on 6/25/22 at 2:46 pm to texastornado
quote:
I disagree with this. Every single person on earth has said that word or the equivalent of it in their language at some point in their lives
I get what you're saying.
But have you ever directed called a black person a n***** and then, in the next sentence said "I'm not a racist".
Within which the context it was presented, the response was 100% accurate. I've used that word in the last month... but I was directly telling a good black friend of mine what his sanctimonious, white liberal neighbor said to me about him, and I didn't want to sugar coat it.
I can honestly say that it's the only time in probably 15 years that I've said that word. And I'm a white Irish guy who was put up for adoption at an early age and fostered by a black family before going to my "forever family" so the "racist!" bullshite names won't work on me. Ever.
frick the white power crowd, and equally frick the black panther crowd.
Posted on 6/25/22 at 3:03 pm to texastornado
There are 2 worlds I’ve never said or even spelled out in my lifetime: the “n” word and C You Next Tuesday. I find them extremely distasteful and unbecoming of anyone who uses them.
Posted on 6/25/22 at 3:07 pm to Frank Black
I doubt that Twitter will discipline her.
Posted on 6/25/22 at 3:25 pm to texastornado
quote:
Studies show people that feel the need to play devil’s advocate on every single topic known to man have mental issues.

Posted on 6/25/22 at 3:30 pm to Frank Black
These idiots don’t realize what he is saying, why, and how the decision impacts “their rights”.
Thomas is pointing out the same shite brought up by my American government teacher about 25 years ago, who was probably to the left of Stalin but would point out stuff like this.
Roe is based on the decisions made for Griswold v Connecticut (contraception) and Loving v Virginia (interracial marriage).
Him pointing out these need to be re-examined doesn’t mean he thinks the end effect was wrong as much as the logic used to justify them was horseshite at best.
Griswold in particular is notorious for pulling “right to privacy” out of a Justice’s arse through “penumbras and enumerations” of the Constitution which don’t exist.
It getting repealed won’t invalidate contraception simply because no legislature will go out on that limb in today’s age but it will rid us of a particularly bad precedent which was used to make more bad precedents.
Thomas is pointing out the same shite brought up by my American government teacher about 25 years ago, who was probably to the left of Stalin but would point out stuff like this.
Roe is based on the decisions made for Griswold v Connecticut (contraception) and Loving v Virginia (interracial marriage).
Him pointing out these need to be re-examined doesn’t mean he thinks the end effect was wrong as much as the logic used to justify them was horseshite at best.
Griswold in particular is notorious for pulling “right to privacy” out of a Justice’s arse through “penumbras and enumerations” of the Constitution which don’t exist.
It getting repealed won’t invalidate contraception simply because no legislature will go out on that limb in today’s age but it will rid us of a particularly bad precedent which was used to make more bad precedents.
Posted on 6/25/22 at 3:42 pm to Frank Black
No one should be surprised that white liberal are the most racist amongst us. And they show it everytime a black leaves the liberal plantation.
Posted on 6/25/22 at 3:46 pm to Frank Black
The easiest place to find hatred against a black person in america… is look for a conservative black person and see how “liberals” treat them.
Posted on 6/25/22 at 3:47 pm to Frank Black
I mean.......
There it is. There's that "Party of Slavery" coming out.
There it is. There's that "Party of Slavery" coming out.
This post was edited on 6/25/22 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 6/25/22 at 3:50 pm to texastornado
quote:
Sometimes, being outrageous gets one heard.
quote:The attention-seeking contrarian knows how to spot the attention seeking twitter b*tch. Unsurprising.
Studies show people that feel the need to play devil’s advocate on every single topic known to man have mental issues.
Posted on 6/25/22 at 3:54 pm to Zarkinletch416
quote:
I have admired Clarence Thomas from the day I saw him battling accusations of sexual impropriety during his Senate Confirmation Hearings.
Yep and the ringleader of this was Joe Biden while he was allegedly fiddling his daughter in the shower! Vile filth!
Posted on 6/25/22 at 4:41 pm to AggieHank86
quote:I'm not sure what her "point" is. Why not go after Alito? He wrote the majority opinion. Why attack the only black person on the SC and call them the n-word? Seems rather low iq and quite racist but that's just me.
But would as many people have clicked and READ her “point.”
In addition, her post is about the n-word not the SC decision. If anything its counter productive IMO
This post was edited on 6/25/22 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 6/25/22 at 4:46 pm to Frank Black
And I get permanently banned from Twitter being pro Trump…lol
Posted on 6/25/22 at 5:07 pm to Frank Black
Wonder if she had a black square on her social media two years ago?
Popular
Back to top
