Started By
Message

re: With 47 threatening to destroy irans energy infrastructure. Is that a war crime?

Posted on 3/30/26 at 3:53 pm to
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
13251 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

civilian targets


You already bought into the false narrative from the press. Oil refineries, power grids, all have military significance. We bombed Germany and Japan's harbors and railways and even their cities in general during WWII.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173651 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

bullshite!
Does energy/oil/electricity/gas aid IRGC military performance?
Of course it does. Does aiding the IRGC hurt humanity? Of course it does.

Good God man!

Sorry. The facts don't support your views. You offered exceptions to the rule and those exist.

That doesn't extrapolate to - we can destroy all water desalination infrastructure and it not be a war crime.

You often seem to be incredibly stupid for someone who claims to be a surgeon.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178945 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 3:53 pm to
can't be a war crime if we aren't at war.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138876 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Basically you saying anyone who does not agree with harming innocent civilians love the Mullahs.
Do you have even a smidgen of a clue as to how ironically stupid your rhetorical is?
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
35923 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 3:55 pm to
I don't recognize any court of law having jurisdiction over the actions of the United States as a country other than the constitutionally mandated US Justice system. I don't recall any laws passed by Congress or anything in the constitution stating what our military can or cannot target.
This post was edited on 3/30/26 at 3:58 pm
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
5564 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

Nah, we carpet bombed German cities, Vietnam and Iraq and no crimes were charged then.


Well considering we did not carpet bomb Iraq and that both WW2 amd Vietnam happened before 1977, your argument makes no sense.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
5564 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Do you have even a smidgen of a clue as to how ironically stupid your rhetorical is?


Are you really that dense?
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45951 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 3:58 pm to
Here, let me break down international law for everyone:

Did the United States do it? Illegal, War Crime, against International Law, etc. etc. which can only be remedied by massive transfers of wealth from the US to the "international community"

Did any other country do it? Totes cool. Carry on.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476637 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

. I don't recall any laws passed by Congress or anything in the constitution stating what our military can or cannot target.

Do you not acknowledge treaty power of the United States?

Like, for example, The Geneva Convention.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17467 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

This thread is pitiful. So many (assuming voting age) posters have a rudimentary, at best, understanding of international law. No you can’t attack civilian infrastructure. Full stop.


So why was three so much cheering for the Palestinians? That not what they did?

So we are good on the Iran actions since they are a state sponsor of terror?
This post was edited on 3/30/26 at 4:02 pm
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
5564 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

You already bought into the false narrative from the press. Oil refineries, power grids, all have military significance. We bombed Germany and Japan's harbors and railways and even their cities in general during WWII


Once again, pre-1977
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138876 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

That doesn't extrapolate to - we can destroy all water desalination infrastructure and it not be a war crime.
1) All water desalination infrastructure =/= all fresh water. Not remotely close. The vast vast vast majority of Iran's fresh water comes from rivers, dams, and groundwater.
2) Coastal military instillations are reliant on desalination.
3) Though we absolutely could destroy every desalination plant in the country and justify it, there was no such proposition issued. NONE! Additionally, re: any desalination plants, the term "maybe" was used in accompaniment.

quote:

someone who claims to be a surgeon
Interesting. Where, pray tell, did I make that "claim"?
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
14811 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:06 pm to
* there are no war crimes when you win....only the defeated are subjected to war crimes......
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55732 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

Isn’t it a war crime if civilian targets are intentionally targeted to inflict harm on the general population?

ETA I say frick it and blow it all up and bring the regime to their knees but just wondered if it was technically considered a war crime.

ETAX2 Grok confirmed it would be.


I believe it's been widely reported the Iranians are doing some indiscriminate bombing of their own. I guess you can expect to get what you gave?
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90572 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:11 pm to
Curtis LeMay would make these pussies piss their pants.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37276 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:14 pm to
All wars are crimes
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45951 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

All wars are crimes


Especially on stolen land.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138876 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Are you really that dense?


DUDE !

Here is your rhetorical:
"Basically you saying anyone who does not agree with harming innocent civilians love the Mullahs."

The actions in question would harm the Mullah regime by design.

So it is a binary choice.
Your choice:
(1) Harm the Mullah regime.
(2) Avoid harming the Mullah regime.

To be crystal clear, the Mullahs are enamored with harming innocent civilians perhaps more than any group of humans presently on earth.

Do you chose #1 or #2?
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
2911 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:23 pm to
it's a war crime if they win, if we win it's not.

watch nuremburg great movie, it's free on either HBO or Prime.

it's funny you come away from the movie sympathetic to goring he was a proud german and by the same token curtis lemany was a proud american and war is he11.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90572 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:24 pm to
Lol you aren't very bright.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram