Started By
Message

re: Why would anyone be against capitalism?

Posted on 6/30/18 at 2:28 pm to
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Um, no.


Um, yes.

capitalism. [kap-i-tl-iz-uh m] noun. an economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations, especially as contrasted to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth.

Even in China, corporations are not state-owned because the Chinese see the importance of capitalism for their future. You're seeing 21st century capitalism through coke bottle glasses. Individual and small business capitalism is still prevalent in our society and a few others but corporate capitalism has taken over the world.

International capitalism occurs between corporations. There are no borders for them. The future is here.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49153 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 2:31 pm to



Yeah, the Cato Institute clearly doesn't know what it's talking about.
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

You get out what you put in. It doesn't get any fairer than that.


Because there is a percentage of the population that would rather rent seek than produce.
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 2:43 pm to
I'll have to assume that your post is referring to market places within nations since you didn't elaborate. Or even provide a link for context.

My point is that corporations have developed an international market place that is nearly exempt, and most likely will soon become completely exempt, from the limitations of political boundaries. The current "trade war" will give us an idea how far along we've come as a world ruled by corporations.

Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49153 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

My point is that corporations have developed an international market place that is nearly exempt, and most likely will soon become completely exempt, from the limitations of political boundaries.


1) That simply isn't the case and 2) just because international trade takes place between oppressed societies doesn't mean the natural benefits of that trade are realized by those oppressed populations.

This is Africa in a nutshell. Nigeria is the second largest economy in Africa and engages in all kind of international trade. Yet, all of gains realized from that trade are swallowed by a totalitarian government that feasts off of being a rentier state.

No person with a basic understanding of economics would describe that as capitalism.
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18185 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 3:21 pm to
Because lazy assholes that claim to bring in only $200-$300 a month want more free shite.

Their galaxy 8s on an obamaphone plan, hundreds of dollars in food stamps, and $30k cars...aren't enough.
Posted by LSUTigerFan247
Member since Jun 2017
3752 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

You get out what you put in. It doesn't get any fairer than that.



People with no confidence don't want to face the unknowns, including failure. They want a guarantee.
Posted by CivilTiger83
Member since Dec 2017
2525 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 3:51 pm to
Capitalism without a moral society will lead to socialism as the antidote.

Think of socialism as a state enforced replacement for religion. It's the path we are on, and the path many other countries are following.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 4:28 pm to
quote:


And in what system have the "winners" not used the system to protect themselves?


They will always protect themselves as best they can. I'm not arguing against capitalism.. it's a pro-government stance. Protections/regulations result in costs that get passed on to the consumer and with free elections the consumer can choose how much they are willing to pay by voting. The more an individuals vote matters the more free they will be.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 4:33 pm to
If you are a fricking noncompetitive loser you want to be taken care of. If you have no talent you want everyone to get the same results.
Posted by zatetic
Member since Nov 2015
5677 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Capitalism without a moral society will lead to socialism as the antidote.


Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 5:03 pm to
Because there were educated in liberal departments of schools like LSU.

I know a kid that is a devoted socialist--so much so that he says no true socialist country exists today. He wants to nationalize all the big companies and make all companies employee owned.

He graduated with honors from LSU.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170790 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

You get out what you put in. It doesn't get any fairer than that.


There is an incredible amount of luck involved in capitalism also

Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
56590 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

There is an incredible amount of luck involved in capitalism also



Only in an entrepreneurial or investment sense - acquiring skills for wage labor isn't rocket science, nor is it a matter of luck.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49153 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

The more an individuals vote matters the more free they will be.


I disagree with that. Populations vote for less freedom all the time. It's the basic idea as to why we became a Republic instead of a Democracy.
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 6:08 pm to
What do you think about the inevitable fact of automation/robotification of the workforce? It seems to me that it most definitely will lead to greater inequality.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49153 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

What do you think about the inevitable fact of automation/robotification of the workforce? It seems to me that it most definitely will lead to greater inequality.



I believe that automation will eventually lead to Universal Basic Income which will lead to greater inequality but will, more importantly, will crush upward mobility and create a permanent underclass.
Posted by rbWarEagle
Member since Nov 2009
49999 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 6:22 pm to
I agree, but I’m not sure I’m sold on the (lack of) potential for upward mobility. There will probably be creative pursuits that will still give way to it. Our society just happens to be cognitively stratified because of the way it developed. I’m not sure I’m ready to say we won’t be able to adapt when UBI comes.

ETA: lack of
This post was edited on 6/30/18 at 6:23 pm
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9584 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

acquiring skills for wage labor isn't rocket science, nor is it a matter of luck.


Would you agree that some people are born smarter or more talented than others? I wanted nothing more than to play professional tennis when I was a kid but I realized early on that I just was not talented enough. No amount of hard work was going to change that fact.

Luck plays a huge part in one's success and lack thereof. It is just uncomfortable to admit that fact. It feels better to believe success is solely due to hard work and diligence.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
56590 posts
Posted on 6/30/18 at 6:29 pm to
Our inherent biological limitations affect our potential ceilings as far as work goes, but everyone with an IQ above 90 is capable of productive, profitable work at this moment in time.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram