re: Why hasn’t anyone been arrested for the 2020 rigged election?

Bannon was jailed for ignoring a Subpoena and Holder was not. Dems open the Border and give massive subsidies for all comers. The Congress impeached Trump on Hillary’s Muh Russia BS which they ALL KNEW was crap. But they would never cheat on an election. Nor will the implement policy which will make election tampering impossible.

Real and honest discourse as a means of compromise has become disingenuous, ‘he said/she said’ petty and counterproductive, and it is inflaming passions toward what always determines ultimate authority. Brute force. Sadly, serious pain is the only thing that will shake people out of their egotistical self delusion. And that check is in the mail.

Not with geriatric retards like you voting, who needs mail in ballots? Pathetic

Yall need to stop with all this. The key now is to consolidate power and control the election process so that Dems never sniff a majority or the white house again.

Trump has an opportunity here to protect us from the leftist horde for many years. He needs to step up and do the hard thinfs.

quote:

---

There were definitely some shady actors involved in the 2020 election that had agendas and manipulated the system

---

I think there was mostly simple incompetence. Our election system has been sloppy and haphazard forever, but elections usually are not close enough for the incompetence to matter. Most of the highly contentious, razor thin margin elections are local, and dont result in massive changes to the system.

The 2000 election revealed the flaws in our system, along with the surprising revelation that it is virtually impossible to accurately count a couple million votes, even using computers.

While Florida was being embarrassed nationally, other states were looking at their own voting systems and realizing changes needed to be made. We still haven't eliminated the flaws, though.

The 2000 election caused Georgia to make massive election changes, including the shift to computerized voting machines. Bush won Georgia easily in 2000, but they realized the statistics in their voting results looked way worse than Florida's.

quote:

---

What actually happens to the red line at approximately 4:30 am?:

---

According to the graph, no one else voted Republican after 4:30 AM period while 200K Democrat votes were tallied in about a 5-minute span. Hmmmm

As for the previous chart, it appears what we call notional.

quote:

---

Why hasn’t anyone been arrested for anything. Nothing happens.

---

Not to Dems.

It’s always all talk.

Massie is upping his troll game.

I wish we had 536 statesmen who didn't carry out their jobs on social media, but we have what we have.

quote:

---

You provided a drawing, based on no data or anything.

---

In a random sample of 2 candidates (one voting Biden and one voting Trump) that's exactly what the distribution would look like over a period of time.

It's exponential and dying out and becoming more parallel as time passes.

Have any of you ever taken a statistics class? Of course you didn't. You were manning your oxygen tanks for underwater basket weaving.

quote:

---

According to the graph, no one else voted Republican after 4:30 AM

---

Can you not read a chart?

The red line is behind the blue line. Look at the blue dot at the end of the line, and you'll see a bit of the red dot below it. What would the graph look like if the red line was in front of the blue line?

The first graph (USA) is a LIE. The second graph is the data.

Clearly a new batch of votes started being counted at @ 4:30. If these were mail-in votes, it would make sense for the Democrats to get more than the Republicans since the Democrats are unemployed lazy sofa surfers who will only vote if it's made extremely easy for them (mail-in), while the Republican voters were told not to mail in their votes. A 4:1 difference would not be unreasonable to expect. And that's about what we see, a 4:1 difference.

The graph not only is not direct evidence of fraud, but it has been manipulated to to lie about the data to promote the hoax of fraud.

Why else lie about the data?

quote:

---

Can you not read a chart? The red line is behind the blue line. Look at the blue dot at the end of the line, and you'll see a bit of the red dot below it. What would the graph look like if the red line was in front of the blue line? The first graph (USA) is a LIE. The second graph is the data. Clearly a new batch of votes started being counted at @ 4:30. If these were mail-in votes, it would make sense for the Democrats to get more than the Republicans since the Democrats are unemployed lazy sofa surfers who will only vote if it's made extremely easy for them (mail-in), while the Republican voters were told not to mail in their votes. A 4:1 difference would not be unreasonable to expect. And that's about what we see, a 4:1 difference. The graph not only is not direct evidence of fraud, but it has been manipulated to to lie about the data to promote the hoax of fraud. Why else lie about the data?

---

Look! Squirrel!

You still haven't addressed the statistical anomaly of Biden's vertical line. Which goes completely against the natural trend.

That is your evidence.

THAT IS YOUR FRAUD!