Started By
Message

re: Why does Alex Jones have to pay for media hoax?

Posted on 8/4/22 at 10:21 pm to
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
21114 posts
Posted on 8/4/22 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

So who did he defame, and how do they prove he defamed anyone by having an opinion? An opinion shared by many, myself included, on the basis of a huge list of bizarre "coincidences" that no one seems to have a logical explanation for.

That's not even getting into the seemingly fake behavior of the purportedly grieving parents.



See what I mean.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
53783 posts
Posted on 8/4/22 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

None of the MSM news outlets had to pay for the Russian Collusion Hoax


Ask Booziedumbass….he’s like really smart and stuff…plus the Russian Collusion Hoax was justified in the name of saving our democracy from OMB.
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
24796 posts
Posted on 8/4/22 at 10:24 pm to
Still missing my point, which is about premise Vs person.

Maybe "principle" is a better word. You and others are complaining about people defending the person, but they are defending the principle. Focus your argument on the principle, not the person, because the person is irrelevant.
This post was edited on 8/5/22 at 9:18 am
Posted by aubie101
Russia
Member since Nov 2010
3598 posts
Posted on 8/4/22 at 10:27 pm to
Alex Jones is a fool. The Sandy Hook thing was stupid (heartless) and wrong, but I agree that our media should be held to the same standards.

Posted by hnds2th
Member since May 2019
3096 posts
Posted on 8/4/22 at 10:42 pm to
Has Jones ever said why he believed Sandy Hook was a hoax?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84543 posts
Posted on 8/4/22 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

Ask Booziedumbass….he’s like really smart and stuff…plus the Russian Collusion Hoax was justified in the name of saving our democracy from OMB.


you’re still mad the guys with the $200,000 educations (not me, mine was obviously much cheaper) don’t feel like explaining it to you so you can summarily dismiss it with your $2,000 education

Cry more, you baby back little bitch
This post was edited on 8/4/22 at 11:01 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/4/22 at 11:35 pm to
Boozy, do you have a new friend?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125514 posts
Posted on 8/4/22 at 11:36 pm to
And all the lawyers have a different idea of what defamation is in this case versus Sandman.

Love that for y’all.
Posted by TigerNlc
Chocolate City
Member since Jun 2006
33098 posts
Posted on 8/4/22 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

Has Jones ever said why he believed Sandy Hook was a hoax?

Our government has no qualms of killing children. I’m not sure why he thought this was fake.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84543 posts
Posted on 8/4/22 at 11:49 pm to
What do you not understand about a default judgment?
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
53783 posts
Posted on 8/4/22 at 11:50 pm to
quote:

Cry more, you baby back little bitch


Cry over what? Because Alex Jones is being rolled up over something he said that was stupid? Naw, I’m not particularly concerned with Jones situation, I’m really concerned at the blatant, in our faces two tier selective justice system that’s been exposed over the past 30-40 years and it’s gotten really bad the past 10-15 years.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
92681 posts
Posted on 8/4/22 at 11:53 pm to
As one of the other posters in another thread said “why is it a felony when we lie to the govt, but the govt can lie to us with no consequences?”
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
13908 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 12:24 am to
Everyone of his small minded followers should sue the piss out of him
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125514 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 7:30 am to
quote:

What do you not understand about a default judgment?


I don’t believe I said anything about a default judgment. But my comment is right there. You can refer to it at your leisure.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 7:32 am to
quote:

If I were to publicly state that FlexDawg repeatedly rapes his daughters and nieces and has been doing so for years, I would be exposed to a defamation claim (assuming that FlexDawg does NOT actually rape his daughters and nieces).


Really classy, a-hole....

Let's bookmark this one for the next time you piss and whine about decency and decorum on the board.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 7:33 am to
quote:

And all the lawyers have a different idea of what defamation is in this case versus Sandman.


That's because the overwhelming majority of Lawyers lack integrity.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
16579 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Post the exact quote that was defamatory.



Jones said that the children killed were actors, playing a role, here are links to their childhood photos and things like that which shows they did exist in real life and were not any kind of theatrical products.

LINK

Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35771 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 8:37 am to
quote:

And all the lawyers have a different idea of what defamation is in this case versus Sandman.

What are you even talking about with this?

Didn’t Sandman lose his case? What was said about that case that is supposedly different now?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 8:44 am to
quote:

the lawyers have a different idea of what defamation is in this case versus Sandman.
The law is essentially the same, with minor differences across the states. The facts are quite different.

For a plaintiff to prevail, the law and the facts must align. They did not align for Sandman. They DID align for the Sandy Hook parents.

This is not complex stuff.
Posted by au4you
Alabama
Member since Dec 2010
3065 posts
Posted on 8/5/22 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Naw, I’m not particularly concerned with Jones situation, I’m really concerned at the blatant, in our faces two tier selective justice system that’s been exposed over the past 30-40 years and it’s gotten really bad the past 10-15 years.
This isn’t a situation where Jones was railroaded by the judicial system. Jones failed to do anything in this case and had a default entered against him. He’s a fricking moron.

Maybe this is a calculated move to galvanize his base and portray his martyrdom. It seems to be working with the mouth breathers defending him in this thread.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram