- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:54 am to NC_Tigah
FFS
I’ve seen other proper conservative search engines but am not as familiar with… the quest continues.
I’ve seen other proper conservative search engines but am not as familiar with… the quest continues.
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 9:08 am
Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:57 am to scrooster
quote:
Ai ... none of them are perfect but Grok is, by far, the least woke.
I'd have to specifically explore topics that might reasonably give the opportunity for censorship or bias, but at least as far as capability goes, I think both Claude & Manus are better tools.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:23 am to scrooster
We’re mad that searching for “white mother” yields results of images of white mothers?
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:31 am to 4cubbies
quote:
We’re mad that searching for “white mother” yields results of images of white mothers?
I would guess that many are mad because they believe an image search, on any search engine, is not attached to any other websearch. If one pays attention, the images given would bring you to articles and books starting with "white mother".
Using "white mother" other than just "mother" leads me to believe, even prior to completing the search, that the article or book is about a white woman in an interracial relationship. Therefore the results seem normal to me.
After using a few search engines, all results come from pretty much the same pages. This is a nothing burger.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:35 am to UtahCajun
quote:
After using a few search engines, all results come from pretty much the same pages. This is a nothing burger.
I guess I'll have to find something else to be outraged about this morning. Bummer.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:38 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I guess I'll have to find something else to be outraged about this morning. Bummer
Well the car wash at the gas station was out of order today. I wanted to wash the corporate vehicle after a fill-up, but now it still has bug juice on the windshield.
Be outraged with me today
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:40 am to blueboy
quote:
Who owns Google?
snip:
quote:
Google is not what it seems
by Julian Assange
https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/
Google is getting WH [White House] and State Dept support and air cover. In reality they are doing things the CIA cannot do . . . [Cohen] is going to get himself kidnapped or killed. Might be the best thing to happen to expose Google’s covert role in foaming up-risings, to be blunt. The US Gov’t can then disavow knowledge and Google is left holding the shite-bag.14
Nobody wants to acknowledge that Google has grown big and bad. But it has. Schmidt’s tenure as CEO saw Google integrate with the shadiest of US power structures as it expanded into a geographically invasive megacorporation. But Google has always been comfortable with this proximity. Long before company founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin hired Schmidt in 2001, their initial research upon which Google was based had been partly funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).48 And even as Schmidt’s Google developed an image as the overly friendly giant of global tech, it was building a close relationship with the intelligence community.
In 2003 the US National Security Agency (NSA) had already started systematically violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) under its director General Michael Hayden.49 These were the days of the “Total Information Awareness” program.50 Before PRISM was ever dreamed of, under orders from the Bush White House the NSA was already aiming to “collect it all, sniff it all, know it all, process it all, exploit it all.”51 During the same period, Google—whose publicly declared corporate mission is to collect and “organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful”52—was accepting NSA money to the tune of $2 million to provide the agency with search tools for its rapidly accreting hoard of stolen knowledge.53
In 2004, after taking over Keyhole, a mapping tech startup cofunded by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and the CIA, Google developed the technology into Google Maps, an enterprise version of which it has since shopped to the Pentagon and associated federal and state agencies on multimillion-dollar contracts.54 In 2008, Google helped launch an NGA spy satellite, the GeoEye-1, into space. Google shares the photographs from the satellite with the US military and intelligence communities.55 In 2010, NGA awarded Google a $27 million contract for “geospatial visualization services.”56
In 2010, after the Chinese government was accused of hacking Google, the company entered into a “formal information-sharing” relationship with the NSA, which was said to allow NSA analysts to “evaluate vulnerabilities” in Google’s hardware and software.57 Although the exact contours of the deal have never been disclosed, the NSA brought in other government agencies to help, including the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.
Around the same time, Google was becoming involved in a program known as the “Enduring Security Framework”58 (ESF), which entailed the sharing of information between Silicon Valley tech companies and Pentagon-affiliated agencies “at network speed.”59 Emails obtained in 2014 under Freedom of Information requests show Schmidt and his fellow Googler Sergey Brin corresponding on first-name terms with NSA chief General Keith Alexander about ESF.60 Reportage on the emails focused on the familiarity in the correspondence: “General Keith . . . so great to see you . . . !” Schmidt wrote. But most reports overlooked a crucial detail. “Your insights as a key member of the Defense Industrial Base,” Alexander wrote to Brin, “are valuable to ensure ESF’s efforts have measurable impact.”
The Department of Homeland Security defines the Defense Industrial Base as “the worldwide industrial complex that enables research and development, as well as design, production, delivery, and maintenance of military weapons systems, subsystems, and components or parts, to meet U.S. military requirements [emphasis added].”61
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:41 am to scrooster
God, the anti-woke skyscreamers are more insufferable than the woke crowd. Probably because you guys are straight-up retards about this stuff, as pointed out already in this thread--why the hell would "white mother" be used for a white woman with white kids? She'd just be "mother."
Maybe take a deep breath and go outside instead of finding some stupid pointless shite online to work yourself up into a diabetic rage against.
Maybe take a deep breath and go outside instead of finding some stupid pointless shite online to work yourself up into a diabetic rage against.
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 9:43 am
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:44 am to scrooster
quote:Because it's fantastic.
why do you continue to use Google?
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:55 am to wareaglepete
quote:
Go test black mother
Go back and ready the post I responded to and see if you can figure it out
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:58 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I guess I'll have to find something else to be outraged about this morning.
The Coast Guard hasn't been actively patrolling the river for the past couple of days.
Posted on 6/2/26 at 10:14 am to scrooster
Wow... What a world and time to be alive. 
Posted on 6/2/26 at 10:16 am to blueboy
quote:
Who owns Google?
Since you're asking... I'm going to guess... muh Da JOOs?
Posted on 6/2/26 at 10:16 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
The Coast Guard hasn't been actively patrolling the river for the past couple of days.
It’s so interesting to me that posters inserted outrage into that benign musing. Appears to be projection.
Popular
Back to top

0











