re: Why do liberals get so mad when someone exposes child sex trafficking?

quote:

---

But we do know that there is a percentage

---

Yes

quote:

---

and that the numbers are substantially higher

---

Not of trafficking. This is your logical leap and strawman.

quote:

---

My point - KIDS ARE BEING TRAFFICKED AND RAPED

---

Why do you people always revert to this when your amplification is proven to be unsubstantiated?

Yeah. No shite. We all agreed there is some trafficking of children at the border. Nobody is arguing with you about the fact it's more than 0.

quote:

---

Your response - yeah, but we don’t know how many, so how can you say its a big deal?

---

No that's not what I said. I said you constructed a straw man by amplifying the numbers.

I never said it wasn't a big deal. You're lying. Why do you have to resort to lies?

quote:

---

I never stated or claimed any actual rate,

---

quote:

---

I never claimed an actual number,

---

No, you said this:

quote:

---

let’s start here

We know that child sex trafficking is prolific at our exposed southern border

---

"Prolific" is the straw man you have no basis to claim. The rest of your post relies on this amplification.

Hence, straw man.

quote:

---

but when legitimate trafficking rings are caught, do they get mad about it?

---

Watch Liberals Protest ICE As The Agency Breaks Up A Child Sex-Trafficking Ring

quote:

---

"Prolific" is the straw man you have no basis to claim. The rest of your post relies on this amplification. Hence, straw man.

---

bullshite

We know that over 140,000 unaccompanied minors were identified - we also know that a large percentage of them are being used, whether for sex or just straight forced labor

on the sex side, even if it is only 1% - that is 1400 and r more kids being raped

I say that is prolific, but we know that the number is FAR higher than 1400

and that measures to protect kids have been abolished

I’m real comfortable on this side of the argument

quote:

---

Yeah. No shite. We all agreed there is some trafficking of children at the border. Nobody is arguing with you about the fact it's more than 0.

quote:Your response - yeah, but we don’t know how many, so how can you say its a big deal?

No that's not what I said. I said you constructed a straw man by amplifying the numbers.

---

you are the one creating a straw man, you are trying to use the fact that the actual percentage is unknown to ignore the real issues - it is happening, our media has fought to ensure it continues and the Biden Admin has forced rules that make it easier to do and harder to stop

quote:

---

quote: The Q anon attachment drove the soys crazy. they must defend.

Why did you insert that letter into this discussion Rog? Nobody was talking about Q until you brought it up.

---

Did Rog insert that meme @ the bottom of your post(s)?

quote:

---

We know that over 140,000 unaccompanied minors were identified - we also know that a large percentage of them are being used, whether for sex or just straight forced labor

---

Where is your academic cite for this?

Like I said, the LINK you posted had a cite that was a dead link. Where is the actual academic/scientific work on this?

quote:

---

Because almost every single one of these pedophiles that's gets caught is left/prog and democrat voter.

---

A lot of the cases I see on social media suggests that the worst perverts come from law enforcement, military, and church leaders. Three demographics that tend to vote R more than D.
I doubt the nuts from Livingston Parish that fed school kids baby batter were left leaning.

quote:

---

Did Rog insert that meme @ the bottom of your post(s)?

---

No, but we're not discussing a movie in this thread, either

quote:

---

Like I said, the LINK you posted had a cite that was a dead link. Where is the actual academic/scientific work on this?

---

So, your response is to ignore the real issue and attack me?

Lovely - here to a something else from my link

quote:

---

In 2019, the Department of Homeland Security, under the Trump Administration, launched a pilot program that allowed for ICE to DNA test families that were deemed suspicious of fraudulent activity. This program was designed to help prevent minors from being trafficked or recycled, and it resulted in criminal charges for the adults exploiting them. Yet this program was met with great disdain by activist groups and lawmakers and is not being used by the current administration.

---

and this -

quote:

---

Sophisticated transnational syndicates are notorious for using children to get single, adult males not just across the border, but through Border Patrol processing. Once these men are granted a stay, they smuggle the children back across the border where they will continue to be trafficked. Studies done by the Latin American branch of the Coalition Against Trafficking In Women estimates that 60% of Latin American children who set out to cross the border alone or with smugglers have been caught by the cartels and are being abused in child pornography or drug trafficking.

---

so, who is using “straw man” arguments here?

hint - it’s not dcbl

quote:

---

One either believes such abuses of children are wrong or they believe something else.

---

Everyone on this board believes actual child sex trafficking is wrong. Full stop.