- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why did the Democrats run Kamala?
Posted on 7/4/26 at 6:32 am to FAT SEXY
Posted on 7/4/26 at 6:32 am to FAT SEXY
Jill Biden added to endorsement to the letter written for Joe when he was forced to bow out. It was a middle finger to the Party and mainly Obama. Obama wanted a primary to push his boy Jeffries ,but with the endorsement Obama had to support the black female canidate, he had no choice. The Obama's ate shite with that endorsement and it caught them off gaurd. That is why it took nearly 3 days for him to come out and endorse her and the left's twitter influencers had no idea either ,because they usually put out a uniform narrative from a script and they were all over the place. The politics of intersectionality came back to frick them in the arse and it was Jill Biden who did it. They all knew she was unelectable.
This post was edited on 7/4/26 at 6:34 am
Posted on 7/4/26 at 6:33 am to FAT SEXY
because the Kenyan wanted a 4th Term …..

This post was edited on 7/4/26 at 6:39 am
Posted on 7/4/26 at 6:59 am to Lsu101205
quote:But even Obama was/is an empty suit as a candidate. He was a professional political agitator who didn't complete his one term in the Senate. And if not for his opponent's divorce records being unsealed he probably loses his first Senate race. He had one of the thinnest resumes for a presidential candidate of the last century. He's become something of a template for the Democrats in that their party is littered with people now who have virtually no experience doing anything but political agitation (AOC, Mamdani, Brandon Johnson, that loon mayor of Seattle). Harris, for all her incompetence and incoherent babbling, on paper, is more qualified than a lot of their up and comers.
That isn't saying Obama was a great president, but candidate wise he gave the Dems someone who could actually win. They have not really had anyone worthwhile since then.
Posted on 7/4/26 at 7:34 am to FAT SEXY
quote:Rumors at the time were that Biden (likely Jill) insisted on it. Pelosi, Obama, and others wanted to have an open convention. Biden flatly refused to withdraw if the result would be an open convention.. I'm not sure outsiders know the exact calculus behind decisions coming out of the Biden camp. Did they realize that Kamala was doomed to fail, and gave Pelosi and Obama a "choice" with a big middle finger greeting? Did they present Kamala as an extension to the Biden administration? Did Joe Biden's recollection of the Chicago convention in 1968 drive the opinion?
I'm still scratching my head about it. She wasn't popular within the party and they trotted her out there anyways..
Posted on 7/4/26 at 7:37 am to NC_Tigah
I chalked it as conceding defeat and trying to burn her out of the 28 pool as a bad candidate that was seen as being owed the opportunity by many
But here she is acting like she’s going to run so we will see what support they give her
But here she is acting like she’s going to run so we will see what support they give her
Posted on 7/4/26 at 7:47 am to FAT SEXY
Desperation. They were stuck with a ego maniac who lacked the self awareness that he was a vegetable, but all of America could see it. The only way to keep the money they had raised to run was for Kamala to stay on the ballot. It was really that simple, Biden forced them into it by not keeping his campaign pledge of running for only one term.
Posted on 7/4/26 at 7:49 am to KCT
Money, pure and simple. Harris already had it. Anyone else would have to arrange and set up donors, develop a campaign infrastructure, etc. The Democrats really had no other practical choice at that point. They were screwed after that debate, and they knew it.
Posted on 7/4/26 at 7:55 am to FAT SEXY
They were hoping to have an open convention and pick someone else but Joe tossed his hat to Harris and they were stuck with her dumbass. So Joe got payback for being undermined.
Posted on 7/4/26 at 8:10 am to FAT SEXY
... that Auto pen guy was extorted by the South Car. Caucus before the nomination with some info Elijah Cummings had passed on before he died .
They used that info to twist that arm ...
Posted on 7/4/26 at 8:18 am to FAT SEXY
quote:
essageWhy did the Democrats run Kamala?
It’s not enough that dems run a candidate that can win, they have to run one that is fully owned.
Posted on 7/4/26 at 8:22 am to FAT SEXY
How exactly did Kamala become black? She likely has some African Negro genetics, but not much. Her mother was South Asian and her father of record appears to have more Caucasian genetics than Black African.
I think Joe got backed into a corner with his promise to appoint a ''Black woman'' VP and had to name a pretend Black.
Stacey Abrams the whale was politicking hard for the job and had to be blocked.
I think Joe got backed into a corner with his promise to appoint a ''Black woman'' VP and had to name a pretend Black.
Stacey Abrams the whale was politicking hard for the job and had to be blocked.
This post was edited on 7/4/26 at 8:23 am
Posted on 7/4/26 at 8:43 am to FAT SEXY
... that Auto pen guy was extorted by the South Car. Caucus before the nomination with some info Elijah Cummings had passed on before he died .
They used that info to twist that arm ...
Posted on 7/4/26 at 8:49 am to bayou2
... and to finish that thought. The Aberdeen Proving Grounds were in the Cummings district of Maryland ...
Posted on 7/4/26 at 10:42 am to bayou2
... it all traces back to the Epstein files and the "Epstein Guy" aka -- Mr Mustache "
Popular
Back to top

0









