- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why aren’t we treating North Korea like we are Iran?
Posted on 3/26/26 at 5:19 pm to sorantable
Posted on 3/26/26 at 5:19 pm to sorantable
because its too late - time to do that was half century ago.
they are the example for not allowing Iran to succeed = the are a real menace to world peace - and if not peace at least a livable standoff = like we have with NK.
they are the example for not allowing Iran to succeed = the are a real menace to world peace - and if not peace at least a livable standoff = like we have with NK.
1
Posted on 3/26/26 at 5:24 pm to Strannix
quote:
There’s your answer, and China
Also, they are not bothering us. They are not impeding the flow of oil or anything else, and they are not attacking Americans.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 5:24 pm to sorantable
We did in 1950-1953. Left 50,000 - 60,000 dead US soldiers and didn’t finish the job. We had Truman and he was scared. McArthur wanted to bomb China. Use the atomic bomb if necessary.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 5:31 pm to sorantable
quote:
They actually have a nuclear arsenal
Ding! Ding! Ding!
“What does he win Johnny?”
Posted on 3/26/26 at 6:29 pm to Ramblin Wreck
quote:
The North Korean government is also more bat shite crazy and wouldn’t hesitate to immediately launch nukes.
Kim Jong Un wants to stay alive and is not a religious zealot. He is a saber rattler. The Iranians are religious zealots and sponsor terror and killings based on their Islamic interpretations. IMO, nuclear weapons in their hands would be far more concerning. Even though the Persians aren't really low IQ arabs, they control many radical arab groups who would willingly set off a nuke if instructed.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 6:31 pm to sorantable
Because the Knesset isn’t concerned about North Korea
Posted on 3/26/26 at 6:35 pm to kingbob
Trump already met with Kim and North Korea really hasn't been a global nuisance since then. Still a colossal piece of shite regime.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 6:39 pm to sorantable
quote:
They actually have a nuclear arsenal, and hate us just as much.
What's your point?
Are you thinking Trump 2.0 needs to let Lil Rocket Man know he may be getting some attention too?
I think Kim Jung Un has some respect for a man like Trump because Trump is always willing to listen to another person's perspective while also being ready to confront any situation that he deems a potential threat to the US, whereas the Islamic Regime in Iran doesn't give two shits about what the US/West thinks or says.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 6:48 pm to sorantable
You should pay attention better
Posted on 3/26/26 at 6:51 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
Seems like this glosses something.
Can’t quite put my finger on it….
Posted on 3/26/26 at 6:54 pm to sorantable
They have a sponsor in China.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 6:56 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Weird perspective I hadn’t heard that one yet.
Have you been living under a rock?
Posted on 3/26/26 at 6:59 pm to Frank Belavis
quote:
Trump already met with Kim and North Korea really hasn't been a global nuisance since then. Still a colossal piece of shite regime
And because despite Trump not winning the 2020 election, Kim knew that he’d be dealing with Trump again as President, eventually. Pretty astute prediction and anticipation on his part.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 6:59 pm to sorantable
quote:
They actually have a nuclear arsenal, and hate us just as much.
Last I checked, NK wasn’t run by a bunch of moslem cocksuckers trying to impose their inbred death cult on the world.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 6:59 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
they are the example for not allowing Iran to succeed = the are a real menace to world peace - and if not peace at least a livable standoff = like we have with NK.
Not to mention that Iran is full of religious zealots that are ready to meet their maker. I think they’d use it unprovoked the minute the got access
Posted on 3/26/26 at 6:59 pm to Penrod
quote:
and they are not attacking Americans
Neither is Iran. Sure they're attacking interests and bases in retaliation. They weren't randomly lobbing missiles out direction prior to us attacking. They're a crazy regime with terrible human rights records. But they have only really attacked us in retaliation strikes. They have a right to defend their nation even if we don't like it.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 7:04 pm to sorantable
Because they don’t disrupt commerce or fund huge terrorist ops around the world.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 7:05 pm to FlySaint
quote:
around the world
And by world you mainly mean region. But yes it does creep beyond that region at times so your observation can't be dismissed.
Posted on 3/26/26 at 7:06 pm to Powerman
I assume that you’ve heard of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, Ret. Were you not aware of the reason and justification for the unprecedented termination of that person by the U.S. military? Just as one particular example, but a pretty significant one.
This post was edited on 3/26/26 at 7:07 pm
Posted on 3/26/26 at 7:08 pm to GeauxZone90
quote:
Iran doesn’t have nukes. I bet you Iran wishes they have nukes now
That’s a very interesting observation.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News