- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:53 am to ataraxia
quote:
That quick pivot from “investigator” to angry degenerate after getting exposed was pretty predictable
Posted on 5/17/26 at 10:56 am to ataraxia
So you registered the account in 23 and just started posting. lol yes this is an alter account.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 11:11 am to RougeDawg
quote:
Letlow's main accomplishment was her husband getting elected.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t she get elected to Congress three times? That’s an accomplishment in itself. Would a PhD not be an accomplishment? How about raising a family by herself? Letlow has stared adversity in the face over and over and has still succeeded. That’s all I need to see.
You’re not wrong about educating Louisianans.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 11:19 am to DCTiger
Fleming must attack
Carbon capture
dei
COVID
In that order.
Most of us here know she's a RiNO that is an empty pant suit.
Avg person probably thinks poor widow that Trump endorses
Fleming should attack her based on her on record positions
Carbon capture
dei
COVID
In that order.
Most of us here know she's a RiNO that is an empty pant suit.
Avg person probably thinks poor widow that Trump endorses
Fleming should attack her based on her on record positions
Posted on 5/17/26 at 11:32 am to jorconalx
You got caught lying about the account age, instantly abandoned the original accusation, and immediately scrambled for a new “proof” instead.
This burner-account paranoia has genuinely become delusional.
This burner-account paranoia has genuinely become delusional.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:13 pm to CitizenK
quote:
Flemiing's support was deep but was never wide.
I voted for him, but it was hard to get excited about a 70 year old candidate.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:24 pm to TheFenceGuy
Dei didn’t she work for the state at a university under Joh Bel Edwards at a time when it was mandated by the government and you lose your funding and job if you do not comply.
Covid - her husband died from it and it was very early in its existence. Also all of government was pushing it down our throat.
Carbon capture - I don’t know enough about it to comment. But I’d giver her a pass on the first two.
By all accounts she seems like a good person and certainly is a reliable person to push forward the trump agenda.
Covid - her husband died from it and it was very early in its existence. Also all of government was pushing it down our throat.
Carbon capture - I don’t know enough about it to comment. But I’d giver her a pass on the first two.
By all accounts she seems like a good person and certainly is a reliable person to push forward the trump agenda.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 12:33 pm to Riverside
Posted on 5/17/26 at 2:48 pm to Penrod
quote:
I voted for him, but it was hard to get excited about a 70 year old candidate.
To your point it was hard to get excited about any of the candidates. I would be good with either one winning.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 3:00 pm to Riverside
Where will Cassidy's voters land?
Posted on 5/17/26 at 3:03 pm to Riverside
quote:
We can deduce from this that roughly 55% of voters, for various reasons, had an issue with her candidacy
By this same logic an even higher percentage had an issue with her opponent's candidacy.
Stupid thread is stupid.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 3:13 pm to KCT
I say we make an AI video of Letlow trashing Trump so that he switches his endorsement to Fleming. In all seriousness though. We just need let voters know that Fleming is the real conservative.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 3:42 pm to Neutral Underground
What if the Never-Trumpers vote for Fleming to spite him for his endorsement of Letlow.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 3:57 pm to LSUA 75
A
There are probably no more than 500 Never Trump Republicans in all of Louisiana.
quote:
What if the Never-Trumpers vote for Fleming to spite him for his endorsement of Letlow.
There are probably no more than 500 Never Trump Republicans in all of Louisiana.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 4:09 pm to LSUbest
Letlow calling herself a real conservative is rich. No real conservatives I know bought into DEI.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 4:11 pm to AlterEd
How is this a stupid question?
The best explanation I’ve gotten is that because she got the most votes in round 1 then she will do so again in round 2. That’s a pretty weak argument.
The best explanation I’ve gotten is that because she got the most votes in round 1 then she will do so again in round 2. That’s a pretty weak argument.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 4:44 pm to LSUA 75
quote:
Never Trumpers
I didn't consider that.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:12 pm to Riverside
quote:
Letlow ran against 2 other major candidates and only got 45% of the vote. We can deduce from this that roughly 55% of voters, for various reasons, had an issue with her candidacy.
No, it means that just over half of voters that participated, preferred one of the two other candidates.
Head to head, there's established precedent that Letlow has the advantage. Does it guarantee a win? No. But its hers to lose.
Posted on 5/17/26 at 8:50 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Where will Cassidy's voters land?
Well.. Trump endorsed Letlow and Cassidy voters want trump impeached and convicted.
So it stands to reason that Cassidy voters will vote for Flemming not Trump/Letlow.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News