Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Baton Rouge
Biography:
Interests:Fishing
Occupation:Retired
Number of Posts:1547
Registered on:11/22/2020
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

why do we have to care about either?

Because Jews and Muslims are not equal.
You moron !!!
You young punks who did not live through the 60s and 70s are ignorant useful idiots.
1. If Israel takes over our country we will be ruled by a law abiding nation that allows people to live and let live.
2. If Islam takes over you will be eliminated.
3. You are like a liberal white woman social justice warrior and you are too stupid to know it.


quote:

Paul would have written a nasty letter to the writers of the gospels that wrote Jesus was raised in the flesh (complete with wound holes and scars)… and that Jesus was ever even on earth in the first place.


Squirrel you ignorant slut.
Paul said he himself bore the wounds of Christ. Also

1. 1 Corinthians 11:23–27 — Institution of the Eucharist

“For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, ‘This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.’
In the same way also the cup… saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this… in remembrance of me.’
For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.”

May Christ rebuke you for the garbage you spew. You are one sick individual.
quote:

On earth, we may not know, at least not until reform happens. There is no infallible ruling authority on earth; the Scriptures are the only infallible rule and authority, and all error will be revealed by God in Heaven


So you admit you may be in error.
You may not think you are but you admit “we may not know” “there is no infallible ruling authority on earth.”
Interesting….
I believe Christ left us a church that is his authority. It is his steward while he is absent. He gave that power to men.
Men who are sinners.
I am impressed by your logic and knowledge. You have studied much and I believe you are sincere in your belief.
You are the most rational and logical person I have ever debated.
I sympathize with your understanding of the early church even though I put more weight on the early church fathers than you must. I believe that the early church was very Catholic but understandably simple at the time.
Good night
quote:

The preachers/elders have the obligation to study the Scriptures and to be corrected by them. That which the Church binds and looses only does so according to what is already bound and loosed in Heaven. If the Church rules falsely, that is not bound in Heaven. The authority is in and by the Scriptures and must constantly be reforming itself by the scriptures.


But if the church is the ruling authority(the final word) how do we know when they “rule falsely”?

quote:

The Scriptures.


But you said that the church interprets the scriptures. They are the final authority over the preachers. The elders who are the governing structure of the church make sure that the preachers don’t teach error that contradicts the Bible.
The elders make sure that the Bible is followed.
quote:

"Having the authority"? No. No one has the authority to chase after error.


Error according to who?
quote:

Failed? No. It was a practical evolution that deviated from what God ordained but the Church was still the Church, even in spite of the incorrect governmental structure.


Let me review what we have discussed.

We both agree that the church has a Governing structure and that it has the authority to interpret scripture.

Which means that if the early true Presbyterian style church that existed for the first hundred years changed the Governmental structure of the church, it had the authority to do so.
Correct?
quote:

Failed? No. It was a practical evolution that deviated from what God ordained but the Church was still the Church, even in spite of the incorrect governmental structure.


So you consider Catholics part of the body of Christ?
quote:

Yes. It started off well and then went down hill rather quickly. From a plurality and equality of elders to a primacy of a bishop in a congregation to a primacy of a bishop in a region to a primacy of the bishop of Rome. Took several hundred years, but it happened


I agree the church out grew the number of apostles and therefor some churches had to appoint presbyters.
But this would mean that the church Christ established failed correct?
I mean you must think the church failed and went astray because it adopted a false form of Gov. correct?
quote:

Catholicism is an episcopate with one head. I believe the Scriptures teach a presbyterian form of government whereby the church is led by a plurality of elders that make decisions and pass them down to the greater church. Acts 15 shows this model in the example of the council of Jerusalem.


So the church lost its way and adopted a false Government and 1200 years later the presbyters re established the correct form? Is this correct please explain if I got it wrong
quote:

It does follow that structure. Those members are part of the visible church but not the visible church.


Please explain why your Presbyterian form of church Gov. is correct but the Catholic form of church Gov is wrong.
quote:

I'm a member of the visible Church of Jesus Christ. You conflate the visible Church of Christ with the organizational structure centered in Rome. I do not.


But you said the Bible lays out a government structure for the church.
You said your church follows that structure. So those members of that Gov.
Are the visible church correct?
quote:

Not unless either of us are elders in church, and only as a plurality of elders, not alone or individually.


So you consider your elders as apostles
Got it.
But you skipped over my earlier question.
Christ promised that the gates would not prevail over the church and yet you are not a member of that church.
Please explain how the CC lost the faith but the gates of hell did not prevale.
quote:

18 Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. 19 Again I say to you, if two of you agree on earth


So … do you or I have the power to bind or loose ?
quote:

He actually gave the keys to all the Apostles. Mathew 18 has Jesus telling all the Apostles that they, too, have the power to bind and loose. The Apostles appointed Elders in the churches to carry on the teaching and ruling authority. And no, the Church is the body of Christ, not the organizational structure based in Rome. I believe the visible Church is much bigger than that, and the visible Church will continue until Christ returns; Hell will not prevail against her.


Please cite Mathew 18 and post it here so I can verify your statement.
quote:

I disagree. Nowhere are we told the the Church is infallible. We are told that the gates of Hell will not prevail against her, but that doesn't mean she is infallible. The only thing we are told that is "God-breathed" is the very word of God.


I will concede Christ never said I will leave you an infallible church.
You are correct
He said the gates will not prevail and he gave Peter the keys to heaven and the power to bind an to loose.
But wait …. The gates did prevail because the Catholic Church has apostasized
quote:

nd Paul had to correct Peter. We don't have the Apostles. The Apostles gave the keys to the elders, who were appointed in every congregation. The elders are Christ's undershepherds, which is why I mentioned presbyterian government.


Correct!
Even the apostles were prone to error.
Only the church as a whole has infallible teaching authority.
So all we need to do now is decide which is the correct church.
quote:

And that's why He gave us the Spirit to guide us and the Church to instruct us.


Close… he gave the apostles the spirit to guide them.
He did not give the same teaching authority to the members.
The apostles had to constantly correct the members of the church.
quote:

I believe that the Bible teaches Presbyterianism in terms of church government (see Acts 15). In Presbyterianism, the plurality of elders of a local congregation provide immediate regulation of the preaching, with the regional presbytery providing additional regulation in cases of complaint. The congregation can complain to the elders of the congregation if there is false teaching occurring. ETA: the regulation at all levels is to be based on the confessional understanding of the scriptures.


So in short… the church regulates the preacher. I agree.
quote:

The problem is that God has one message but we are sinful and do not understand it rightly because of that sin. "The word" is not subjective.


Agree but we are not lost to guess which interpretation is correct.
Christ promised that he would not leave us orphans.