- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who will the dems run in 2020 and what chance do they have of beating Trump?
Posted on 6/3/17 at 11:47 am to tarzana
Posted on 6/3/17 at 11:47 am to tarzana
quote:
Sanders is too "out there"
Technically, he might've won the nomination this year if the DNC wasn't crooked. People on both ends of the spectrum wanted an outsider.
This post was edited on 6/3/17 at 11:49 am
0
Posted on 6/3/17 at 11:51 am to _Hurricane_
As long as we've got the 'race' wedge firmly planted in the middle of their party, they won't win for awhile.
It's in our best interest to encourage them to focus on that, so they will continue to divide themselves within their ranks and alienate their own voters on election day.
It's in our best interest to encourage them to focus on that, so they will continue to divide themselves within their ranks and alienate their own voters on election day.
This post was edited on 6/3/17 at 11:52 am
Posted on 6/3/17 at 11:52 am to _Hurricane_
Mitch Landrieu
Posted on 6/3/17 at 11:58 am to _Hurricane_
Once the only ones that concern me are one of the Castro brothers or Cory Booker. The Castro Brothers could unify the Hispanic vote and a large large part of Texas if not actually taking Texas. Cory Booker I think has broad appeal. Not worried about Elizabeth Warren, she's another whack-job who would never get elected.
Posted on 6/3/17 at 12:02 pm to _Hurricane_
I would love for warren to be the nominee. She would not stand a chance.
Posted on 6/3/17 at 12:06 pm to CCTider
quote:A Franken Trump debate would be priceless.
I also could see Al Franken making a run. He's good enough, he's smart enough, and dog gone it, people like him.
Posted on 6/3/17 at 12:48 pm to _Hurricane_
Elizabeth Warren or one of the Castros.
Posted on 6/3/17 at 1:02 pm to _Hurricane_
Booker and Gillebrand will be strong contenders, Franken could make a move and there are some Governors
This post was edited on 6/3/17 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 6/3/17 at 1:09 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
A Franken Trump debate would be priceless
That would be a pay per view worthy event.
Posted on 6/3/17 at 1:16 pm to CCTider
As far as who Trump should be worried about:
Biden
Kamala Harris
Who he should hope for:
Warren
Bernie
Hillary
Franken
Booker
Castro bros
Any other white guy
Biden
Kamala Harris
Who he should hope for:
Warren
Bernie
Hillary
Franken
Booker
Castro bros
Any other white guy
Posted on 6/3/17 at 1:22 pm to Lsujacket66
quote:
Kamala Harris
For being 52, she's pretty damn hot.
>
Posted on 6/3/17 at 2:06 pm to _Hurricane_
Biblically speaking - 42 months in Trump is gone; Pence as incumbent will be hard to beat, if he doesn't go all hard core from the start. (just a theory - but for sure the Trump certainly blows)
Posted on 6/3/17 at 2:25 pm to _Hurricane_
The amount of times people make threads about this topic a day...
It's gonna be either Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, or Andrew Cuomo.
It's gonna be either Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, or Andrew Cuomo.
Posted on 6/3/17 at 2:33 pm to Andychapman13
quote:
What you meant to say is if cucks keep believing the cuck media that 2020 will be like de javu all over again!
When someone has nothing meaningful to say, the default fallback post usually uses the silly term "cuck".
Posted on 6/3/17 at 2:49 pm to _Hurricane_
Don Lemon Black+Gay+Celebrity+ Lying SOB
Posted on 6/3/17 at 2:54 pm to VOR
quote:
When someone has nothing meaningful to say, the default fallback post usually uses the silly term "cuck".
I did indeed learn that term here!lol Thing is, when responding to such a meaningless post, I don't feel the need to create a grand metaphor or dress up what I'm trying to say. The left is silly to keep doing the exact same thing that got them in the "Trump is President, OMG!" place in the first place. I did however offer meaningfull contributions to the post, saying I think Castro and Booker are the most likely guys, but the whole thing will hinge on the economy more than peoples' opinions of Trump's brand.
Posted on 6/3/17 at 3:10 pm to _Hurricane_
Biden is the best they have and he is going to be very old by 2020.
Castro is a lightweight pretender. Warren isn't much better and Booker seems more like VP material. Franken would be interesting but it doesn't seem like he wants it.
Castro is a lightweight pretender. Warren isn't much better and Booker seems more like VP material. Franken would be interesting but it doesn't seem like he wants it.
Posted on 6/3/17 at 3:14 pm to fargobison
Franken definitely wants it but I just don't see him as a good candidate.
Kamala would be ridiculously hard to beat, frankly I don't think he could beat her unless someone has some good oppo on her
Kamala would be ridiculously hard to beat, frankly I don't think he could beat her unless someone has some good oppo on her
Posted on 6/3/17 at 3:22 pm to _Hurricane_
Some token or if they rig it again another insider geriatric white
Posted on 6/3/17 at 3:41 pm to Lsujacket66
quote:
Kamala would be ridiculously hard to beat
1. She goes into a matrix that does not favor her, hate it all you want, but it is what it is.
2. In defending her "constituents" she has put herself out there to the point that it will re-enforce point #1.
On a side note though, I work with a lot of black women and find the good ones to be irreplaceable and extremely good at their jobs.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News