- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is the logic behind this deportation? What is the purpose?
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:26 pm to Pettifogger
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:26 pm to Pettifogger
Let’s also not ignore the fact that this lady tried to manipulate our laws by having an anchor baby. I find that particularly galling.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:27 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
The people you support let in millions of unvetted illegals. It is now a huge problem that requires drastic measures. That
Link? You made this up. Show me a post of me supporting Biden or anyone in his administration.
Straw man.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:27 pm to KiwiHead
Just be honest and admit you support open borders and no immigration laws whatsoever.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:28 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
What laws did she break?
Are you really that stupid. She was here ILLEGALLY which is a crime
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:28 pm to Riverside
quote:
Let’s also not ignore the fact that this lady tried to manipulate our laws by having an anchor baby.
Getting married and having a baby doesn't equal "trying to have an anchor baby".
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:28 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
So go for the low hanging fruit devastate American families just to prove a point?
So we stop imprisonment of criminals??
Again.. how do you get on the “I get to pick and choose laws” list? Forms? Interviews? Have to pass a test? Write essays? How do you get on that list?
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:28 pm to 4cubbies
Why are democrats so selectively outraged about which laws should and should not be followed?
Breaking federal law via sanctuary cities and impeding law enforcement is permissible, yet detaining and deporting individuals who are here illegally isn’t?
It’s the height of hypocrisy.
Breaking federal law via sanctuary cities and impeding law enforcement is permissible, yet detaining and deporting individuals who are here illegally isn’t?
It’s the height of hypocrisy.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:29 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
So go for the low hanging fruit devastate American families just to prove a point?
......tough guys!!!!!!
No. Go for all of the fruit because I don't support spending a trillion dollars to identify the charity cases.
Again, this should put more focus on how our leaders intentionally abrogated our laws for decades to put us in this situation. Some more than others. They did so knowing this day would come and the appetite to throw out the "good" with the "bad" would make it politically hard.
Our leaders (again, some in particular) did this to us, and they did it intentionally. And we're going to shoot arrows at the people doing the unprecedentedly difficult work to undo it?
Spare me.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:30 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Link? You made this up. Show me a post of me supporting Biden or anyone in his administration.
Straw man.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:30 pm to Decatur
quote:
Some say it’s the whole point.
Dropping 15k immigrants in a small town is what's cruel.
Now you have a housing and job shortage. You have overburdened the school and healthcare systems of that town.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:30 pm to MemphisGuy
That’s exactly what she did. She had been ordered deported and then married an American and popped out a baby.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:31 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
What laws did she break?
damn yall are some stupid mother frickers
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:31 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Nobody would ban you
You might be surprised. I’m surprised every time it happens to me. Crossing my fingers I can make it to football season.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:31 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
Getting married and having a baby doesn't equal "trying to have an anchor baby".
Well it was her second marriage and after she was told to deport.
She appealed saying i should get asylum now i have a baby.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:32 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
So go for the low hanging fruit devastate American families just to prove a point?
If she was American she wouldn't have this problem. Send her back.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:32 pm to Decatur
quote:
You might be surprised. I’m surprised every time it happens to me. Crossing my fingers I can make it to football season.
Just say you are pro illegal immigration.
You won't get banned for that.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:35 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
So go for the low hanging fruit devastate American families just to prove a point?
You sure about that?
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:36 pm to Snipe
quote:
There's your answer. It's not petty to uphold the laws of this country. And it's certainly not stupid at least to those of us smart enough to know laws are a very important function of a civil society.
Meh. Living here 50 years after being given a pass from the government is different than most of these situations.
Without evidence that she did something, or missed appointments, or didn’t pay taxes, etc, this one is just petty.
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:36 pm to jchamil
quote:
How do you know this is obviously an act of cruelty? All you know is what her husband (is it even really her husband if she has no green card) said in a news article
Ok
Posted on 6/25/25 at 4:37 pm to 4cubbies
5 second Google search and it turns out:
She tried to do a sham marriage to a US citizen to get her green card. She divorced that guy before marrying her current husband but our immigration policy is that once you’ve tried to exploit our system by marrying a citizen for convenience, you can no longer use marriage to get legal immigration status. Sucks for her because I would assume her current 35 year marriage with a child is legit, but 1980s Donna screwed it up for 2025 Donna.
LINK
quote:
Milne was divorced from the nonimmigrant student she married prior to 1983. She then married a U.S. citizen but we found, in our above-said unpublished opinion, that she had admitted that it was a marriage of convenience. After another divorce, she married her current husband, a marriage that is uncontested as "bona fide." Her request for legal permanent resident status based on this marriage was denied under INA § 204(c) which precludes approval based on even an admittedly good-faith union if the petitioner had previously contracted an improper marriage.
She tried to do a sham marriage to a US citizen to get her green card. She divorced that guy before marrying her current husband but our immigration policy is that once you’ve tried to exploit our system by marrying a citizen for convenience, you can no longer use marriage to get legal immigration status. Sucks for her because I would assume her current 35 year marriage with a child is legit, but 1980s Donna screwed it up for 2025 Donna.
LINK
Popular
Back to top


1






