Started By
Message
locked post

What If Presidential Hopeful Andrew Yang Is Right?

Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:43 am
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:43 am
quote:

McKinsey predicts that by 2030, jobs like dishwashers, equipment operators, food-preparation workers, general mechanics and truck drivers in America will witness a 31% decrease in employment due to automation. That’s a lot of people put on the streets should there be no retraining programs made available.

The Freedom Dividend is a potentially positive step in the direction of helping those displaced by the coming wave of automation. Expensive? Yes, of course. It’s in the neighborhood of $3 trillion per year. Yang has a plan to fund it, in part, through a value-added tax (VAT). Naturally, there are naysayers.

But there may not be an alternative for the US. For example, there are approximately 5 million professional drivers in the US be it driving trucks, taxis or others of its ilk. What happens when a fraction of those drivers are dislodged by an autonomous driving robot overlord? What happens when there is no skills replacement program?


quote:

There are other components to Yang’s platform that deserve some attention. He wants to revive the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA), an organization first commissioned by President Nixon but sunset in 1995. OTA acted as an early warning system against the undesirable side effects of developing technologies. It sure could have come in handy over the advent of Facebook and its kind.

Yang also believes data ought to be a property right. His articulation suggests the following: “Data generated by each individual needs to be owned by them, with certain rights conveyed that will allow them to know how it’s used and protect it.” It’s hard to disagree that our data should be in our possession, specifically as a right.


LINK



Posted by Bwmdx
Member since Dec 2018
2763 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:44 am to
Andrew, quit posting.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37538 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:45 am to
No, it’s a tax. And we all see how properly people spend money they didn’t earn.

What we need is less restrictions, it’s more. You want these menial jobs NOT to be automated? Eliminate the minimum wage. Make it so it’s cheaper to hire people than robots.

Also get high school away from college prep for most kids and make it the jobs training program.
This post was edited on 5/23/19 at 6:47 am
Posted by OneFifty
No favorite team now
Member since Aug 2012
3872 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:47 am to
What does Marco Rubio think about it?
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84875 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:47 am to
Republicans say basically let those people all starve
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17438 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:48 am to
quote:

OTA acted as an early warning system against the undesirable side effects of developing technologies.


Freedom police
Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5713 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:48 am to
quote:

That’s a lot of people put on the streets should there be no retraining programs made available.


What, these people can’t go find another job or learn themselves a new skill in their own, a retraining program has to be made available to them, at my cost, I’m assuming?
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:49 am to
quote:

And we all see how properly people spend money they didn’t earn.


The data doesn’t show this. In many of the studies where cash is given to the poor, there has been no increase in drug and alcohol use. In fact, many people use it to try and reduce their alcohol consumption or substance abuse. In Alaska, for example, people regularly put the petroleum dividend they receive from the state in accounts for their children’s education. The idea that poor people will be irresponsible with their money and squander it seems to be a biased stereotype rather than a truth.

Decision-making has been shown to improve when people have greater economic security. Giving people resources will enable them to make better decisions to improve their situation. As Dutch philosopher Rutger Bregman puts it, “Poverty is not a lack of character. It’s a lack of cash.”

LINK
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:49 am to
Cotton gin
Mechanical Reaper
Etc
Etc
Etc

New jobs will replace the old ones.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
15101 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:50 am to
quote:

McKinsey predicts that by 2030


Will be too old by then to care.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Republicans say basically let those people all starve




Republicans say basically don't throw trillions of dollars at every scare money/power grab scam the leftists dream up.

fixed it for you

ll fricking years, I am noticing a trend

and we are only 6.5 years until ALL big rigs on the orad are self-driving! (I have been keeping track since it was 10)
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51664 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:51 am to
quote:

What If Presidential Hopeful Andrew Yang Is Right?


Translation: No one is buying Yang's bullshite so it's time to try fear tactics.
This post was edited on 5/23/19 at 6:52 am
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29688 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:52 am to
quote:

What If Presidential Hopeful Andrew Yang Is Right?

then a bunch of people should learn to code...
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131398 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:53 am to
Where does the money come from?

ETA - lulz at Alaskans don’t spend their dividend check on alcohol.
This post was edited on 5/23/19 at 6:55 am
Posted by Animal
Member since Dec 2017
4222 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:53 am to
quote:

Republicans say basically let those people all starve


No. Conservatives say take care of your own shite and don't over burden the populace with legislation and taxes that hender people from taking care of their own shite.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84875 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:54 am to
“Ignore the problem and hope it goes away”

Very responsible of you. This is why I can’t take conservatives seriously, it’s not that I think liberal solutions are necessary the best solutions, but when the alternative is to pretend a problem doesn’t exist you’re not giving me much choice, are you?
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
12800 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:54 am to
The best natural experiment that exists are Native Americans and casinos. You should look up how well that’s worked out.
Posted by frogtown
Member since Aug 2017
5034 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:54 am to
quote:

Republicans say basically let those people all starve


Democrats say they will give you free stuff for your vote.
This post was edited on 5/23/19 at 6:57 am
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18674 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:54 am to
So take from producers and give to non-producers. No thanks. Just like every revolution or evolution in the work place people need to adapt. While dishwashers May go away some other low skilled jobs will be created. People who WANT to work will always find a way.

They have to WANT to. Even the early church went away from socialism because people who could work refused to do so. Human nature being what it is some group or type of people will always try to be unproductive that has to be uncomfortable or else they won’t change.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 6:55 am to
He is right about the inevitabiliy of it.. and its the right time for a discussion and to begin planning. A bit too soon to act imo.

Thomas Paine, 1796: Out of a collected fund from landowners, “there shall be paid to every person, when arrived at the age of twenty-one years, the sum of fifteen pounds sterling, as a compensation in part, for the loss of his or her natural inheritance,. . . to every person, rich or poor.
This post was edited on 5/23/19 at 7:28 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram