re: What does Jimmy Kimmel's Kids Heart Problem have to do with ObamaCare?

quote:

---

Point me to the section about children dying in the streets.

---

If you truly claim you want to learn more about it, as you say, then read the whole thing.

You'd do well to have a better understanding of the thing you seem certain didn't exist pre-ACA.

quote:

---

And that has nothing to do with anything I've said in this thread. It is completely unrelated

---

So with an obamacare policy, a middleclass family in Kimmel's situation would likely have to pay upwards of $6000-$10000 for several years in a row on top of the cost of their already pricey obamacare policy.

Given that, I guess I'm missing your point here.

quote:

---

If any bill passes, it won't be your decision whether your kid can do XYZ - it'll be a bureaucrat in DC making that decision about your child's life.

---

Fixed

quote:

---

If you truly claim you want to learn more about it, as you say, then read the whole thing.

---

Nah, I'd like you to point me to anything that supports the over-the-top emotional bullshite you regularly bring to these threads. You've never even attempted to support it, so I can only conclude that you're talking out of your arse, as usual.

quote:

---

You'd do well to have a better understanding of the thing you seem certain didn't exist pre-ACA.

---

So far, I appear to have a better understanding of it than you, and that's sad. You do this for a living. I don't.

I really doubt bamaatls claims of work in the medical field. Such a stark misunderstanding of statistics and study interpretation is troubling.

What study would you like to discuss? What statistical argument are we making in this thread?

Go on...

quote:

---

Clear cases of recission happening pre-ACA, and you still refuse to believe it happened.

---

No, I want specific instances of "children dying in the streets," "lives at stake," or any of the other bullshite claims you've made in these threads.

Link those, or admit it was purely emotional, and we can move on.

It was in reference to your threads in the past citing misleading studies and faulty numbers.

Just search your own thread history.

OK, OK. You aren't the caring giving soul I thought you to be. Got it.

Anyway, I'm not sure asking the responsible to pay for the irresponsible is very moderate.

quote:

---

citing misleading studies and faulty numbers

---

They're not faulty because you don't agree with them on a policy level. If we can't agree that KFF is a legitimate source of information, then you're really living in a different world than the rest of us.