- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What Are Your Arguments Against Bill Barr’s Determination The Evidence Was Not Fraudulent?
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:36 pm
Listening to the hearings and I admit this is the one piece of evidence against the theory that Trump actually won that I have never been able to refute.
Bill Barr was the top law enforcement officer in the country, and a man who was appointed by Trump. He is also an established statesman with zero reason to believe he would defy his patriotic duties and lie to the country (or betray the GOP) if there had in fact been evidence of fraud.
As a prosecutor, he deals in evidence. I’m not saying it’s not there, but I am saying no one has been able to point me to objective evidence (besides the 2000 Mules fundraising movie, or telling me “it’s there, if you don’t see it then you’re not looking”).
Even the committee admits there was fraud. But there has never been evidence that there was fraud to a level that could have impacted the election.
Why would Barr lie if there was evidence.
Bill Barr was the top law enforcement officer in the country, and a man who was appointed by Trump. He is also an established statesman with zero reason to believe he would defy his patriotic duties and lie to the country (or betray the GOP) if there had in fact been evidence of fraud.
As a prosecutor, he deals in evidence. I’m not saying it’s not there, but I am saying no one has been able to point me to objective evidence (besides the 2000 Mules fundraising movie, or telling me “it’s there, if you don’t see it then you’re not looking”).
Even the committee admits there was fraud. But there has never been evidence that there was fraud to a level that could have impacted the election.
Why would Barr lie if there was evidence.
This post was edited on 6/23/22 at 4:38 pm
41
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:38 pm to Sulu
quote:
As a prosecutor, he deals in evidence.
No, he doesn’t. He deals in theory.
He has theorized that it’s ok for Federal agents to shoot unarmed women if they decide they want to.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:38 pm to Sulu
Because easier and more profitable to lie and keep the big lie going.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:38 pm to Sulu
quote:
Why would Barr lie if there was evidence.
All Barr needs to do is detail the investigations that led him to that conclusion.
The truth, which is documented, is that he shut down investigations.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:39 pm to Sulu
He’s a Deep State stooge.
/thread
/thread
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:39 pm to Sulu
quote:
Why would Barr lie if there was evidence.
Because he's an Establishment Turd?
Here's the Evidence
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:40 pm to DownSouthJukin
Oh come on - that’s some James Bond villain type conspiracy.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:43 pm to Sulu
quote:
But there has never been evidence that there was fraud to a level that could have impacted the election.
How many same-day-registration, provisional Wisconsin ballots were counted that were attached to addresses that were not legitimate?
How many votes were cast in the North Shore communities of Milwaukee county that were fraudulent?
How many people who were not indefinitely confined registered as indefinitely confined in the state of Wisconsin? (Hint: that number is easily over 50,000)
How many people voted at illegal early voting events in Wisconsin?
How many votes did Biden win Wisconsin by?
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:44 pm to Sulu
quote:
Bill Barr was the top law enforcement officer in the country, and a man who was appointed by Trump. He is also an established statesman with zero reason to believe he would defy his patriotic duties and lie to the country (or betray the GOP) if there had in fact been evidence of fraud.
Exactly.
quote:
Even the committee admits there was fraud
There is probably fraud in every election, but not with millions of votes and a half dozen states to the point that the outcome was changed.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:45 pm to Sulu
If it’s fraud you are asking about, look no further than the swing states SOS. They changed voting laws without using the legislative branch to change their own states voting laws. That in of itself is fraudulent.
I know it’s hard for liberals to figure out but for all states that “suddenly” stopped counting votes at 2am, kicked everyone out of the counting rooms then suddenly started counting behind closed doors to help Pedo Joe win isn’t suspicious? Every swing state had Trump ahead, everyone went to sleep to awaken to news Biden won is bullshite. It’s mathematically impossible for the vote totals to equal what they did. Dems in those states put pedo Joe in.
I know it’s hard for liberals to figure out but for all states that “suddenly” stopped counting votes at 2am, kicked everyone out of the counting rooms then suddenly started counting behind closed doors to help Pedo Joe win isn’t suspicious? Every swing state had Trump ahead, everyone went to sleep to awaken to news Biden won is bullshite. It’s mathematically impossible for the vote totals to equal what they did. Dems in those states put pedo Joe in.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:48 pm to Sulu
quote:
Why would Barr lie if there was evidence.
As a Biden supporter you know, without a doubt in your mind, Bill Barr is one of the Deep State anchors. Barr will do anything for the Deep State.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:50 pm to Sulu
Please return to DU. Thanks
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:52 pm to doubleb
quote:
not with millions of votes
There didn’t need to be millions of fraudulent votes.
Wisconsin - 20,000 votes margin
Arizona - 10,000 votes margin
Georgia - 12,000 votes margin
That’s 42k votes deciding races where 11.5M voted. Or 0.3% of the vote in those three states.
This post was edited on 6/23/22 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:54 pm to Sulu
William McSwain, Former United States Attorney, Eastern District of PA, 2018-2021 states that
"On Election Day and afterwards, our Office received various allegations of voter fraud
and election irregularities. As part of my responsibilities as U.S. Attorney, I wanted to
be transparent with the public and, of course, investigate fully any allegations. Attorney
General Barr, however, instructed me not to make any public statements or put out any
press releases regarding possible election irregularities. I was also given a directive to pass
along serious allegations to the State Attorney General for investigation – the same State
Attorney General who had already declared that you could not win."
He never looked into allegations of voter fraud after the establishment outrage came in. He just wanted nothing to do with it. A disgrace to this country. No backbone.
"On Election Day and afterwards, our Office received various allegations of voter fraud
and election irregularities. As part of my responsibilities as U.S. Attorney, I wanted to
be transparent with the public and, of course, investigate fully any allegations. Attorney
General Barr, however, instructed me not to make any public statements or put out any
press releases regarding possible election irregularities. I was also given a directive to pass
along serious allegations to the State Attorney General for investigation – the same State
Attorney General who had already declared that you could not win."
He never looked into allegations of voter fraud after the establishment outrage came in. He just wanted nothing to do with it. A disgrace to this country. No backbone.
This post was edited on 6/23/22 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:55 pm to the808bass
quote:
He has theorized that it’s ok for Federal agents to shoot unarmed women if they decide they want to.
Randy Weaver agrees with this post.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:55 pm to Sulu
I reject his rejection of 2,000 Mules as it seems he doesn't understand what he's talking about.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:56 pm to DownSouthJukin
quote:
Because easier and more profitable to lie and keep the big lie going.
This. Every critter that breathes the Swamp Gas is tainted and corrupted in some fundamental way: if anyone pulls hard enough on the string, the entire ball of yarn will become unraveled.
The moment Trump nominated Bill Barr as AG, it was obvious that Trump’s stated desire to drain the swamp was doomed to fail. Barr ultimately stands as a prime example of why a vote for the UniParty® is vote for the left or right wing of the Deep State.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:56 pm to doubleb
quote:
There is probably fraud in every election, but not with millions of votes and a half dozen states to the point that the outcome was changed.
This statement right here is unfathomably ignorant. It has to be intentional.
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:57 pm to Sulu
Because the Director of National Intelligence says there was. DNI > AG
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:59 pm to Sulu
quote:The same Bill Barr that led the Department of Justice during Ruby Ridge?
Why would Barr lie if there was evidence.
That Bill Barr?
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News