Started By
Message

re: “We’re going to pay off...the $35 trillion in debt. We’re going to pay it off...fast too.

Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:28 am to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:28 am to
quote:


Not possibe with you around, jock stain.


Hes so close to declaring himself to be friend of Karl M.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63498 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:28 am to
quote:

But dag-nabbit if that dang Clinton didn't eliminate the annual (not the historical "piled up from the past") deficit.
Actually it was the Newt Gingrich congress that did that. And the "surplus" didn't include SS.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98240 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:29 am to
I figured you wouldnt be able to answer

We have the three stooges making fools of themselves in this thread
Posted by Ribbed
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2023
2745 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:30 am to
quote:

I figured you wouldnt be able to answer

Oh, I can and do when it matters. You don't matter. You've not said anything coherent in months. Not sure you are able anymore, cultist.
Posted by Ribbed
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2023
2745 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Hes so close to declaring himself to be friend of Karl M.

Just waiting on Daddy Trump to give the signal.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63498 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:32 am to
quote:

The budget can be cut without cutting SS and Medicare.
Of course it can. But you'd have to cut it by about 85% of all discretionary spending if you want to pay off any debt. Do you think the entire government is going to shink to 15% of its current size?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:33 am to
quote:

I figured you wouldnt be able to answer


Convince me to vote for Trump.

I dont need protection from Chinese or Mexicans, I dont want more money thrown into the economy robbing my kids of their future, and I want competent bureaucracy.

Why should I vote for economic positions that put us deeply in debt?

Im close to retirement, why would I want my 401k going stagnant like happened in 2020 and 2021?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98240 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Oh, I can and do when it matters


Basically you cant answer and a made a fool of yourself like always. We just witnessed it

Take the lithium so you can calm down

quote:

Convince me to vote for Trump.


You r a Dem. Vote blue no matter who is your slogan. There is no convincing someone that low iq
This post was edited on 12/8/23 at 8:39 am
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:33 am to
quote:

absolutely do, and your ideal creates serfs, not free people


My idea? What? The argument is that wealth creation doesn't come from the government borrowing. But when governments borrow, that spending has to go somewhere. There are several use-cases that show that government borrowing, within a broader economic liberalization programme, has helped spur economic growth. India is useful case. Once the country liberalized and liberalized their monetary policy, they took on more government debt as well as external debt, with remarkable results. By itself, those liberalization policies lifted more people out of poverty than any direct government intervention, with the difference between government spending post-liberalization is the relationship between private capital and government. This follows the model of post-war Japan, South Korea and other developing economies.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63498 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:37 am to
quote:

The US debt has increased precisely because there is a demand for US securities.

And GDP growth has been fantastic.
That's because the NPV of the debt isn't included in GDP. It's the equivalent of "I'm rich!!! Look at this new car, my huge TV, my massive fancy house." And not counting the debt it was all bought with.

The problem with the 'strong dollar" economic plan is that it depend on the rest of the world doing worse than the US. As soon as that changes, the flight of capital will be deadly.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:40 am to
quote:


Your a Dem.


Trumpophiles would confuse Conservatives for Progressives. After all, Donny kicked off this inflationary period.


One of the primary tenets of conservatism is individual responsibility. Your ideology teaches collective responsibility.
This post was edited on 12/8/23 at 8:43 am
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63498 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:43 am to

quote:

We have to do what it takes to have a constantly growing population base
You might want to have a peek at reproduction rates in the US, Europe, and parts of Asia.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
73093 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:43 am to
My favorite part is where he used the wrong “your” but had to edit it to “you r” so people think he isn’t a complete idiot after trying to bring up someone else’s iq.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:44 am to
quote:

The problem with the 'strong dollar" economic plan is that it depend on the rest of the world doing worse than the US. As soon as that changes, the flight of capital will be deadly.


Yet the consistent bet has been what?

The US is far better positioned structurally than several areas of the world, and that is in the absence of US intervention. Imaging some situation in which those areas suddenly can start working together is a fever dream at this point. For example, Indian and Chinese geopolitical aspirations run against one another in such a direct way that it is impossible to think that they could ever work together on a currency or something. Ironically, fundraising in the Indian tech sector focuses on Chinese investment using US dollars specifically.

Again, the demand for US securities has been extremely consistent. Suggesting that demand might go away due to some hopeful international scenario isn't even an argument against lessening demand, as it would take a long time for such a situation to develop to the degree that investors would risk their money.

Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63498 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:45 am to
quote:

You just parrot cnn talking points like the good antifa warrior you are
Idiot.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63498 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Hes so close to declaring himself to be friend of Karl M.
He'd do it if Trump told him to.
Posted by Ribbed
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2023
2745 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:47 am to
quote:

ou r a Dem. Vote blue no matter who is your slogan.

Accusing Roger of being Dem or Antifa with your cult leader's positions is hilarious. You say whatever idiotic nonsese pops into your mind. I don't have to argue that.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:47 am to
quote:

The problem with the 'strong dollar" economic plan is that it depend on the rest of the world doing worse than the US. As soon as that changes, the flight of capital will be deadly.

I know this board loves to promote apocalypse fetishizing, but we are still doing better than the rest of the world.

We have issues, and saying that doesn't ignore those issues, it's just that everyone has similar issues (or at least issues with as much of an impact) WITHOUT our economic production and international projection.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:47 am to
quote:

You might want to have a peek at reproduction rates in the US, Europe, and parts of Asia.



I literally addressed this in the rest of my post. I know that the TFRs are of the developed world and am well aware of the interventions that have been developed and haven't worked. What does work in stabilizing fertility rates has been immigration.

A Pentagon paper in 2018 suggested that around 300 million people are going to move from the 'Global South' to developed economies for the next century. The US is just far better than the rest of the world in integrating immigrants that it poses a massive advantage.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 12/8/23 at 8:48 am to
quote:


I know this board loves to promote apocalypse fetishizing, but we are still doing better than the rest of the world.


Does that mean that people shouldnt be somewhat vigilant, particularly since our economy is tied to theirs?
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram