- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:28 am to wickowick
quote:No hunting rights, I suppose. Must save those dandies for the royal's and their troglodyte offspring to hunt.
Wait there are so many deer that they are eating every tree?
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:30 am to djmed
quote:
A reintroduction of the animals could help stimulate the growth of native woodland by hunting red deer, which consume tree saplings and bark from older trees.
Or you could just introduce some good ol' baws with a .30-06.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:30 am to djmed
Or, just hunt the deer and harvest whatever the required number is.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:31 am to djmed
Why not just extend deer season? Make more people happy.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 2:07 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
The Earth’s climate has never not been changing. Do these fools expect the climate to remain static in its current state? There isn’t a damn thing humans can do to prevent climate change.
Why the lefties comeendered the phrase and connected it to their global warming. You deny CC you look like a fool. Though they are talking about man made CC and reasonable people are talking about mother-nature CC. Cause confusion for the young, and gullible.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 2:13 pm to OldNo.7
The late, great Sir Winston was a descendent of three beauties
Posted on 2/17/25 at 2:16 pm to djmed
I wonder what cult asylum those "experts" are from...
Posted on 2/17/25 at 2:20 pm to djmed
quote:
making each of the predators 'worth' £154,000
quote:
167 wolves
What is that, like $33M or something?
I'll take care of those frickers for half that if they pay to fly all that meat home for me.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 5:15 pm to djmed
If we’d release the wolves on the Democrats and globalists we’d also solve the problem
Posted on 2/17/25 at 5:31 pm to BamaCoaster
quote:
Here's my take:
These scientists or grants they received are tied to wolves, the study of wolves, etc.
So, more wolves=more study=more money.
I do not know.
They probably wanted to study wolves and could get no funding so they tied it to climate change and the grant came in.
If you look at grant apps from most govt agencies they will tell you preference is given to the big three : lgbtqu, climate change, or black/women issues.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 5:35 pm to RedHog260
Speaking of dumbasses........
Now dont you look foolish.
quote:
In 2023, wolves killed 96 elk, 33 bison, and three moose.
quote:
In the summer, 10,000–20,000 elk spend time in Yellowstone.
Now dont you look foolish.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 5:36 pm to djmed
For those saying it's crazy lookup what happened when they reintroduced wolves to yellowstone
Posted on 2/17/25 at 5:39 pm to tadman
Not sure what it says about me that I knew within two seconds that that’s Seekins Precision PH2 in Urban Shadow with aftermarket carbon fiber wrapped barrel.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 5:42 pm to wickowick
quote:
Wait there are so many deer that they are eating every tree?
Exactly
Seems like there are several more efficient ideas out there to remedy this problem.
How about issuing hunting licenses to hunt these deer and use the meat to stock food pantries and homeless shelters, as well as lower the consumption of beef amongst the population? You know, instead of releasing mass amounts of predators that won't just kill the deer you're after
Posted on 2/17/25 at 5:42 pm to djmed
Just let
TheDrunkenTigah
Clames
Downshift&FloorIt
Rize
all take their friends to the Highlands and you won't have to introduce an apex predator.
They can start a case study on .308 vs 6.5C. Settle it once and for all while eliminating a climate threat (as desribed by authors)
TheDrunkenTigah
Clames
Downshift&FloorIt
Rize
all take their friends to the Highlands and you won't have to introduce an apex predator.
They can start a case study on .308 vs 6.5C. Settle it once and for all while eliminating a climate threat (as desribed by authors)
This post was edited on 2/17/25 at 5:44 pm
Posted on 2/17/25 at 5:43 pm to djmed
Release em in your neighborhood you stupid fricks
Posted on 2/17/25 at 5:44 pm to SloaneRanger
Amazing at the idiots that have bought into this shite! Carbon is NOT a problem.......period!
Posted on 2/17/25 at 5:45 pm to djmed
Posted on 2/17/25 at 5:50 pm to djmed
quote:
The study showed that a total population of 167 wolves across Cairngorms, South-west Highlands, Central Highlands and North-west Highlands would be enough
“Say, McKintosh, lets tell them we need 200 wolves to do the job.”
“That sounds a bit contrived, McConnell. And it sounds like it’s too many.”
“Okay, how about 150 wolves then?”
“Sounds better, but it shouldn’t be an even number.”
“Of course. Then let’s go with 165.”
“If we tell them 167 wolves it sounds like we used a real complicated formula to arrive at the number.”
“Aye, 167 it is!”
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News