- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wall Street Journal to publish bombshell story linking Trump and Epstein
Posted on 7/17/25 at 6:59 pm to NashvilleTider
Posted on 7/17/25 at 6:59 pm to NashvilleTider
This is starting to smell like a “typed letter” about Bush.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 6:59 pm to the808bass
This is him partying on Maxwell's yacht in 1989, "minus Ivana."
There was only one reason for a rich guy to even know Epstein in 1992. Here's the story of them partying at Mar a Lago.
Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein partied together. Then an oceanfront Palm Beach mansion came between them.
Here's a witness account.
>
Again, none of this means Trump fricked kids, but the history between he and Epstein is more than just shaking hands and taking a couple of pictures.
And my point, which your zealot arse keeps missing, is that the media has more than enough ammunition to MAKE Trump look guilty ESPECIALLY BECAUE HE'LL NEVER RELEASE ANYTHING IN ORDER TO PROTECT frickING ISRAEL.
get it now?
There was only one reason for a rich guy to even know Epstein in 1992. Here's the story of them partying at Mar a Lago.
Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein partied together. Then an oceanfront Palm Beach mansion came between them.
Here's a witness account.
> Again, none of this means Trump fricked kids, but the history between he and Epstein is more than just shaking hands and taking a couple of pictures.
And my point, which your zealot arse keeps missing, is that the media has more than enough ammunition to MAKE Trump look guilty ESPECIALLY BECAUE HE'LL NEVER RELEASE ANYTHING IN ORDER TO PROTECT frickING ISRAEL.
get it now?
This post was edited on 7/17/25 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:01 pm to blueboy
lol Trump cares way more about himself than Israel - the antijew right is out of hand. Go take a walk, there aren’t boogey men under your bed.
This post was edited on 7/17/25 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:03 pm to WongsPalace
Could have been planned by Biden DOJ. Not sure how they could/would do it, but I don't know how they have pulled off half the shite that they have against Trump.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:07 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
boogey men under your bed.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:19 pm to NashvilleTider
That doesn't sound like Trump, the guy who often has misspellings in his posts. Maybe it is, I don't know.
This post was edited on 7/17/25 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:26 pm to blueboy
quote:
There was only one reason for a rich guy to even know Epstein in 1992.
Are you saying that everyone who was ever linked with Epstein fricked kids? Or just Trump?
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:33 pm to the808bass
Everyone who went to parties 'minus' their wives where Epstein showed up with a shitload of girls. 
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:37 pm to tigeraddict
quote:
Getting the left to push for the release. Just like he wants
Why not…just release them?
There is no need to get the left to ask for it
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:50 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Why not…just release them?
Just out of curiosity, you can’t think of any reason(s) why not, even if you don’t necessarily agree with the reason? Can you come up with even just one? One or more, preferably. Obviously more would be impressive, IMO, to show one’s ability to see all sides of a situation.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:54 pm to WongsPalace
A move like that by the MSM will force Trump to expose all the dirty Dems.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:58 pm to WongsPalace
I imagine the Trump administration has known about this story for weeks and it now makes sense why Trump has been freaking the frick out trying to make Epstein discussion go away. I've been raising an eyebrow trying to piece together why hes being so weird about it...
Are you still talking about Epstein
The Epstein files are a Democrat hoax
Anyone who's making a big deal about Epstein isnt a real supporter of mine
This letter is fake!

Are you still talking about Epstein
The Epstein files are a Democrat hoax
Anyone who's making a big deal about Epstein isnt a real supporter of mine
This letter is fake!

Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:59 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
I imagine the Trump administration has known about this story for weeks and it now makes sense why Trump has been freaking the frick out trying to make Epstein discussion go away.
I gather you have not actually read the story yet.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:00 pm to Lsuhoohoo
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 6 questions for the idiots at the Wall Street Journal:
1. How on earth did you just suddenly find a letter from 2003?
2. Who gave it to you? When? What were the terms?
3. Why didn’t you publish the “letter” in full?
4. President Trump’s always been known for writing personal letters by hand. Can you cite a single example of him sending a typewritten note?
5. He is also known for his straightforward and direct writing style (just like his speaking style). Can you cite one (1) other example of him writing in whimsical riddles like this “letter” you suddenly found?
6. Don’t you find it odd that this “letter” magically appears now—not before 2016, 2020, or 2024—but right when the Democrats are trying to weaponize “Epstein” against Trump?
Cancelling my WSJ subscription. Absolutely disgraceful article.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:02 pm to davyjones
quote:
Just out of curiosity, you can’t think of any reason(s) why not, even if you don’t necessarily agree with the reason? Can you come up with even just one? One or more, preferably. Obviously more would be impressive, IMO, to show one’s ability to see all sides of a situation.
About why he needs to bait the left into asking for them?
No can’t find a good reason.
He controls the DOJ. It solely needs to operate on truth.
If there is significant evidence it speaks for itself. You don’t need the left to beg for it to make arrests. You just do it.
If there isn’t anything and you spend all weak calling people dumb for talking about it and then backtrack it only looks like you got bullied into it. It also comes across as hiding something when you did a 180 going from promoting it to silencing it to releasing a nothing burger list.
He would have been better off just releasing it to start OR letting the story breathe not silence opposition and calmly keep the line of it ended up not having the degree of information we thought and then the story dies.
Instead he dropped an additional bomb of falsification of evidence and then proceeded to bully people into ignoring it.
By the way. That’s how you directly address a question.
I addressed the subject you asked about and didn’t try to devolve from your question of whether there was value in baiting the left
This post was edited on 7/17/25 at 8:06 pm
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:21 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Its a set up. Just opinion. If they run a piece, it will result in a release by team Trump
Like I was saying
Popular
Back to top


0









