- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Virginia’s Abortion Amendment Would Strike Down Statutory Rape Laws
Posted on 7/23/26 at 1:29 pm to Archives
Posted on 7/23/26 at 1:29 pm to Archives
quote:
Why do they call it "Reproductive freedom" or "Reproductive health care" when it's reproduction they want to eliminate?
Because being a champion for "a woman's right to murder her child" kinda grates on the ears of even the loudest proponents of abortion.
0
Posted on 7/23/26 at 1:46 pm to Night Vision
quote:
it will eliminate statutory rape laws for consenting minors, since the amendment provides an unqualified ‘fundamental right to reproductive freedom’ to every ‘individual,’ without any limitation on age,
I do not see the logic here. How would that language eliminate statutory rape laws?
Posted on 7/23/26 at 1:52 pm to JimEverett
quote:
I do not see the logic here. How would that language eliminate statutory rape laws?
Because that would restrict the kid’s right to screw who they want.
Screwing is part of reproduction.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 1:58 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Because that would restrict the kid’s right to screw who they want.
Screwing is part of reproduction.
Does Virginia charge kids in statutory rape cases?
Posted on 7/23/26 at 2:01 pm to JimEverett
I meant to add more to this - is the idea that a 50 year old man can use his right to reproductive freedom to have sex with underage girls? If so, that seems like a very big stretch.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 2:07 pm to Night Vision
Sick.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 2:10 pm to JimEverett
quote:
Does Virginia charge kids in statutory rape cases?
I think the focus is the combination of:
(A) a restriction on “burdening”
(B) a specific standard of review of “least restrictive means” and
(C) it being a constitutional amendment
Nevertheless, I agree; don’t think the state would have difficulty showing legitimate interest and least restrictive means for statutory rape statutes
Posted on 7/23/26 at 2:12 pm to Night Vision
North Virginia, Minnesota, and Wisconsin have to have the highest concentration of whacked out white people on the planet
Posted on 7/23/26 at 2:14 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Well, Democrats are generally immoral according to God's law, so that would make sense that they are trying to remove restrictions on sin.
Says the supporter of the deity who never changes and on whom objective morality rests who has created and endorsed the magic abortion potion of Numbers 5 which does not require the consent of the pregnant mother to test her faithfulness by killing her unborn child if she committed adultery.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 2:21 pm to Night Vision
They are trying to import Muslims. Think about it. That close to DC? Free Democrat voters, and all of the taxes will run out Republicans that would normally oppose them.
Im convinced that is the plan, and all of these taxes and law changes are putting it into motion. When the time comes, they'll start destroying all of the monuments and memorials.
Im convinced that is the plan, and all of these taxes and law changes are putting it into motion. When the time comes, they'll start destroying all of the monuments and memorials.
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:12 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:You still in deep study about the sperm of the patriarchs?
Squirrelmeister
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:13 pm to Night Vision
Is this some kind of sharia law shite?
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:42 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
You still in deep study about the sperm of the patriarchs?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News