- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Vice President Vance White House Press Briefing: Confirming Media Lies
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:26 am to FLTech
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:26 am to FLTech
quote:
What are some issues you have with the agreement? Can you list a few?
Wasn't posed to me, but I don't see a single positive in the agreement. So my answer would be all of it.
If the MOU is even close to accurate or even along the same lines of what's being negotiated, there was no reason to ever fight this war. We didn't accomplish anything, but we certainly left Iran in a stronger position than it was before as it relates to outside investment, sanction relief, and the Strait of Hormuz.
2
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:26 am to Bob_Sugar
JD is so damn sharp. Imagine Walz doing this.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:27 am to JimEverett
quote:
I like the idea of U.S. and U.S. allies making private investments in Iran. $300 billion of private investment would basically give the U.S. and its allies major control and influence over Iran.
Somebody gets it! Congratulations on not being retarded!!
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:27 am to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
It’s a shite sandwich
It’s shite in the sense none of the previously stated goals for Iran were accomplished. I think Trump realized he was lied to by Israel and their shills in our government.
I think long term it will be a win. Feels a little Trump v1 imo in that it’s an additional step towards peace in the region. He’s betting on the new regime preferring prosperity to never ending conflict. I hope he’s right.
This post was edited on 6/18/26 at 11:39 am
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:28 am to JimEverett
quote:
I like the idea of U.S. and U.S. allies making private investments in Iran. $300 billion of private investment would basically give the U.S. and its allies major control and influence over Iran.
No it doesn't. It means Iran's industries and businesses get subsidized by Gulf investments that only serve to prop up the regime that will eventually nationalize any entity or industry that has too much Western influence.
Imagine thinking we're going to be friends with these people going forward
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:29 am to JimEverett
quote:
I like the idea of U.S. and U.S. allies making private investments in Iran. $300 billion of private investment would basically give the U.S. and its allies major control and influence over Iran.
Now the 300B is a good idea, after we heard the phrase "largest state sponsor of terror" for months.
So this means you also support the unfrozen money from the Obama admin?
Well why shouldnt we have just given them the money right off the bat and never went to war?
Why only 300B shouldn't we increase it to 500B?
This post was edited on 6/18/26 at 11:30 am
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:29 am to lurking
quote:
It’s shite in the sense none of the previously stated goals for Iran were accomplished.
Wow! I guess eventually it will stop once Tik Tok attention span gets diverted to the next OMB crisis. Until then, we have to read the first thought of a bunch of retards that can't think for more than 3.5 milliseconds.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:29 am to Bob_Sugar
quote:
I like the idea of U.S. and U.S. allies making private investments in Iran. $300 billion of private investment would basically give the U.S. and its allies major control and influence over Iran.
Somebody gets it! Congratulations on not being retarded!!
That's some insane spin. Imagine Washington Post writing a headline saying "Here's Why Funding A Hostile Terrorist State May Actually Be a Good Thing"
If that's true, did Obama's Iran deal make a mistake by not giving Iran enough money?
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:33 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Exactly. Even george crawled out of the gutter to cry
Eat up with TDS along with the new tards posting
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:33 am to Bob_Sugar
quote:
I guess eventually it will stop once Tik Tok attention span gets diverted to the next OMB crisis. Until then, we have to read the first thought of a bunch of retards that can't think for more than 3.5 milliseconds.
The irony of you posting this while ignoring the rest of my post so you can reee about a slight criticism of Trump isn’t lost on me
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:33 am to Bob_Sugar
I know a lot of you have a chubby on for Rubio but this guy should be POTUS 48.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:34 am to Indefatigable
Thos investments will bring money like iranians have not seen in a generation or more. It is possible the leaders will attempt to nationalize indutries/projects with foreign equity, but anyone can see the risk of such a move in a country that has already seen large government protests.
Given the situation, I think this is the most promising aspect/course to bring about real change in Iran.
Given the situation, I think this is the most promising aspect/course to bring about real change in Iran.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:34 am to Ingeniero
quote:
That's some insane spin. Imagine Washington Post writing a headline saying "Here's Why Funding A Hostile Terrorist State May Actually Be a Good Thing"
That's why there are performance contingencies, genius.
And frick the Washington Post.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:36 am to GeorgeTheGreek
Your comprehension skills aside, what are your qualifications or grievances?
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:36 am to lurking
quote:
isn’t lost on me
You have not proven otherwise.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:36 am to Bob_Sugar
When the actual document is available to see for ourselves, we don't really need anyone's spin.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:36 am to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
You can read the MOU for yourself. It’s a shite sandwich. Vance can spin it however he wants. Go read the text.
Clearly you haven’t. It’s an agreement to try to come to an agreement. 90 percent is stil to be negotiated. Anyone claiming it great or a shite sandwich at this point is a complete moron.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:36 am to JimEverett
quote:
Thos investments will bring money like iranians have not seen in a generation or more. It is possible the leaders will attempt to nationalize indutries/projects with foreign equity, but anyone can see the risk of such a move in a country that has already seen large government protests.
Given the situation, I think this is the most promising aspect/course to bring about real change in Iran.
I cannot wait to see how the spin on this entire ordeal ages. We have people who actually believe that the war was the right thing to do, that we succeeded in ...something?, and that this trash deal that amounts to status quo ante plus Iran getting money is going to bring about profound change in Iran.
Its like I'm taking crazy pills.
Posted on 6/18/26 at 11:36 am to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Now the 300B is a good idea, after we heard the phrase "largest state sponsor of terror" for months.
So this means you also support the unfrozen money from the Obama admin?
Well why shouldnt we have just given them the money right off the bat and never went to war?
Why only 300B shouldn't we increase it to 500B?
Where are you getting the idea that this is a transfer of money?
And I hope the invetments do reach $500b, that would mean Iran is fully inside the sphere of western influence and no longer a state sponsor of terrorism.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News