Started By
Message

re: Vice President Vance destroys Margaret Brennan - “I don’t really care, Margaret”

Posted on 1/26/25 at 4:32 pm to
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3996 posts
Posted on 1/26/25 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

They didn't send anyone back who should have applied in Mexico.

No, they weren't sent back BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T PROPERLY VETTED UNDER PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIONS - WHICH IS VANCE'S POINT.

IMMIGRANTS AND ASYLUM SEEKERS MUST BE PROPERLY VETTED.

quote:

why are Venezuelans coming here?

Because Venezuelan capitalists are being persecuted by the corrupt Socialist Maduro government.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 1/26/25 at 4:45 pm to
He’s very Scotch Irish
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8170 posts
Posted on 1/26/25 at 5:27 pm to
He nuked her from orbit
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
27200 posts
Posted on 1/26/25 at 5:31 pm to
Quote from Vance: I don't care Margaret and I don't want that person in my country and I think most Americans agree with me.

Talking about a particular migrant that had been vetted.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
35553 posts
Posted on 1/26/25 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

But that's very important seeing as how you can't exclude entry to someone one who has been properly vetted and proven to not be a radical.


This is where you are wrong.

They are referencing thousands of Afghans who have no business coming here, vetted or not.

Posted by GrizzlyAlloy
Member since Aug 2020
2581 posts
Posted on 1/26/25 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

do these dumbass commie faux journalists really want their asses handed to them on a platter each day the next 4 years maybe 8? how dumb are these left wingers?


12
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23268 posts
Posted on 1/26/25 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

And why are Venezuelans coming here? Why not Brazil, Panama,. Mexico, etc.?


Jesus. Are you serious?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
80007 posts
Posted on 1/26/25 at 8:41 pm to
Maybe I wasn't clear. My question was more shouldn't the Venezuelans be going to those other countries by law? I know the previous administration didn't care and wanted to pile them in here. Is there actually a law/rule about amnesty seekers applying to the nearest country without the persecution present?
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23268 posts
Posted on 1/26/25 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

shouldn't the Venezuelans be going to those other countries by law?


No. They are, in general, very sympathetic to the communists in Venezuela.

We hate the communists, so Venezuelans are more likely to be granted asylum than other Central or South Americans. Of course, Biden started flying them in by the tens of thousands without vetting them and Maduro turned out his prisons. Now Trump has a hell of a mess to clean up.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
80007 posts
Posted on 1/26/25 at 8:54 pm to
Ok. I didn't know that Panama, Mexico and Brazil were that sympathetic to the Venezuelan govt.
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
21925 posts
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:06 pm to
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23268 posts
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

Panama, Mexico and Brazil were that sympathetic to the Venezuelan govt.


de Silva in Brazil and Maduro are socialist buds. Claudia Sheinbaum in Mexico is also a socialist. Socialist bros before......well, you know the rest.

Panama's president actually promised to stop migration, but he's pissed about the Canal thing. Probably not too cooperative right now.
Posted by tadman
Member since Jun 2020
5445 posts
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Where was this adversarial tone the last 4 years? Hahaha



To be fair, Biden never did much of an interview and Harris babbled about nothing. It's hard to debate (fairly or not) people who are not saying anything or anything of substance.
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
20424 posts
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:55 am to
It never ceases to amaze me that these leftist liberal “journalists” feel the need to argue with conservatives on every point while holding the hands and even prompting favorable responses from the leftist politicians.
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
13292 posts
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:56 am to
At this point, I bet these "journalists" get the call from their producer saying "You're interviewing JDV, and their response is, "Oh frick!"
Posted by Wildcat1996
Lexington, KY
Member since Jul 2020
10411 posts
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:03 am to
I'm not on a great deal of social media, but apparently this has become pretty popular with the kids.

Posted by Stidham8
Member since Aug 2018
10344 posts
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:06 am to
He’s going to be a great Presidential nominee in 2028. Extremely impressive.
Posted by Stidham8
Member since Aug 2018
10344 posts
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:07 am to
quote:


He may be the best orator currently in the political theater when it comes to getting his point across in a logical manner, in a way they everyone understands where he is coming from, and in a way that makes his opponent sound like they are ignorant on the topic at hand.


They’re terrified of him in 2028.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
89081 posts
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:39 am to
There are no journalists anymore. Merely network-employed activists.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87411 posts
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:44 am to
When did interviewers start fact checking during an interview? Shouldn't they simply ask questions and let the audience decide?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram