- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/12/19 at 6:34 pm to jnethe1
quote:I'd call it terrorism, but that's because I don't believe that abortion is murder.
What would you term it?
Same as you.
This post was edited on 5/12/19 at 6:36 pm
Posted on 5/12/19 at 6:40 pm to xiv
Can you not read?
Oh I see, this is the old liberal tactic of purposefully being ignorant.
Well let me make it simple.
I do not like abortion
However, I place trust in system we currently have, even though system is currently allowing murder.
To display violence, as you want, would be terrorism. And would be akin to the behavior of Muslims. Which I’m thankfully not.
Oh I see, this is the old liberal tactic of purposefully being ignorant.
Well let me make it simple.
I do not like abortion
However, I place trust in system we currently have, even though system is currently allowing murder.
To display violence, as you want, would be terrorism. And would be akin to the behavior of Muslims. Which I’m thankfully not.
Posted on 5/12/19 at 6:41 pm to Sweltering Chill
quote:Obviously you don't know what delusional means and you have zero insight. It's amusing watching pro death people try to blindly scramble and claw to the top of the moral high ground. You're going to be ridiculed by future generations.
This is delusional thinking.
Get a grip.
Posted on 5/12/19 at 6:44 pm to jnethe1
quote:Not every person fits into your imagined caste system where there are two types of people in the world.
this is the old liberal tactic
I'm not liberal.
quote:61million...man, that meter sure is ticking. You sure do trust our government a lot. I love your "62-million strikes and you're out" hard-line policy against abortion.
I do not like abortion
However, I place trust in system we currently have, even though system is currently allowing murder.
quote:I don't want you to commit any acts of violence.
To display violence, as you want,
quote:...or the Allies, but then again, the Holocaust was actually murder.
would be terrorism. And would be akin to the behavior of Muslims.
Abortion isn't, which is why acts of violence against those responsible for abortion would be terrorism.
This post was edited on 5/12/19 at 6:47 pm
Posted on 5/12/19 at 6:46 pm to Jake88
quote:Wrong side of history!!!
You're going to be ridiculed by future generations.
Posted on 5/12/19 at 7:00 pm to xiv
History looks favorably on those who've supported the death of innocents, hasn't it?
Posted on 5/12/19 at 7:07 pm to Lsujacket66
Roe v Wade gets overturned? Lol no. Even if it did, Democrats would eventually control everything anyways.
Posted on 5/12/19 at 8:05 pm to ChexMix
quote:
When money > life, you should reevaluate your priorities
Go ahead. Adopt. Show how it's done.
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:19 pm to xiv
Do you have any idea how stupid your writing is?
How many years did they decide another human was property?
Do you agree with that as well?
quote:
Our government entities have maintained for 46 years that a woman has a constitutional right to the reproductive privacy and autonomy necessary to decide to have an abortion.
How many years did they decide another human was property?
Do you agree with that as well?
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:27 pm to CelticDog
quote:
When money > life, you should reevaluate your priorities
Go ahead. Adopt. Show how it's done.
The wife and I did in 1997, the process wasn’t easy but we got through it.
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:36 pm to dafif
quote:Context, pal.
How many years did they decide another human was property?
Do you agree with that as well?
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:39 pm to xiv
In what possible frickin way is their context? I'll listen. Please explain.
Our Supreme Court decides god given inalienable rights in context?
Our Supreme Court decides god given inalienable rights in context?
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:40 pm to dafif
quote:Read the entire exchange you took my quote from. The explanation is there. What you quoted is a reply to something. You took it out of context and thought you had a gotcha.
In what possible frickin way is their context? I'll listen. Please explain.
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:46 pm to xiv
No, I read every post you put into this thread. You wrote what I quoted. There is no additional context. You support pulling a baby's head out of the birth canal, after breathing, and sticking scissors into its head to kill it.
It is disgusting and you are on the wrong side of history.
It is disgusting and you are on the wrong side of history.
Posted on 5/12/19 at 9:55 pm to dafif
quote:Wrong. Let me know when you’ve caught up. Until then, I recommend you talk to people who aren’t me.
There is no additional context.
Posted on 5/12/19 at 10:04 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
Great... more unwanted kids that we'll have to financially support. Really thinking this through.
Yeah! Children are such a burden we should just murder them!
Posted on 5/12/19 at 10:37 pm to MoarKilometers
frick this line of thinking. The “choice” is in the original act of intercourse. Contraception has come a long way since Roe v. Wade. It’s simply inhumane to dispose of a human because it’s inconvenient.
Posted on 5/12/19 at 11:29 pm to Nguyener
quote:
Yeah! Children are such a burden we should just murder them!
Your right in that we shouldn't murder them. It doesn't take away the fact that they will be supported by you and me regardless of who the parents are.
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News