- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USSC Vax Mandate Day
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:09 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:09 am to cajunangelle
I now realize why nothing gets done in DC. Listening to these morons jump from topic to topic with no real substance, no one knows what the hell is even being discussed.
No one calls out the blatant lies either, like 'the vaccinated cannot spread covid'. This is insanity.
No one calls out the blatant lies either, like 'the vaccinated cannot spread covid'. This is insanity.
1
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:09 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
The 3 Libs NEVER consider voting any other way. Ever.
Last term, there were more 9-0 decisions than 5-4 and 6-3 ones combined. Unanimous and 8-1/7-2 decisions make up two-thirds of the court's cases.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:09 am to BOSCEAUX
Rekieta just said it's like listening to madcow talk on TV
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:10 am to Indefatigable
quote:
The legal issue for OSHA turns on whether the OSH Act intended OSHA to protect workers from workplace harm, or from this all encompassing general harm that the administration wants to accept. It is about OSHA's authority.
Whether the vaccine does or does not work, or whether anyone is choosing to get it is not relevant to that question.
First, whether or not the "vaccine" works should always be a consideration, ESPECIALLY when the "vaccine" has been DEFINITELY SHOWN to cause damage itself.
BUT, having said that, I was talking about OSHA's ability to force employers to force employees to do something that is DANGEROUS IN AND OF ITSELF in order to stay employed and provide for their families. No government agency should have that authority, but especially a politicized government agency that is actively hiding the risk of the "medicine" that it is forcing on employees.
STRAIGHT FROM THE OSHA WEBSITE.....
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:10 am to USAFTiger42
Welp, plantiffs are done.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:11 am to Indefatigable
quote:
8-1/7-2 decisions make up two-thirds of the court's cases.
I bet the fat Latina is always the 1 or part of the 2. She’s a legit retard.
This post was edited on 1/7/22 at 10:11 am
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:11 am to Oates Mustache
quote:
I now realize why nothing gets done in DC. Listening to these morons jump from topic to topic with no real substance, no one knows what the hell is even being discussed.
No one calls out the blatant lies either, like 'the vaccinated cannot spread covid'. This is insanity.
All of this. It's infuriating and embarrassing.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:11 am to Lsut81
Masks do not work you stupid bitch.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:11 am to Lsut81
quote:
Welp, plantiffs are done.
And they basically got their asses handed to them by the SCOTUS, by no fault of their own, but rather by the blatant lies being said by the judges themselves. Amazing.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:11 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Last term, there were more 9-0 decisions than 5-4 and 6-3 ones combined. Unanimous and 8-1/7-2 decisions make up two-thirds of the court's cases.
I was referring to contentious, political cases, but you are right I shouldn't have phrased it that way.
There were a ton of slam dunks on the docket last year.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:11 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
The 3 Libs NEVER consider voting any other way. Ever.
I F*CKING GUARANTEE YOU that if Trump had issued the mandate, these three complete f*cking SCUMBAGS would be all about protecting the civil rights of employees and would vote against any mandate.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:12 am to MMauler
quote:
First, whether or not the "vaccine" works should always be a consideration,
Just because you say so? That is not what is before the Court. Courts do not just do things.
quote:
I was talking about OSHA's ability to force employers to force employees to do something that is DANGEROUS IN AND OF ITSELF in order to stay employed and provide for their families.
Policy determination that is not before the Court.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:12 am to BOSCEAUX
Not sure. But there would have been nothing wrong with anyone there---- saying those are not facts. I don't know if that is Roberts place when a justice pontificates political talking points from MSNBC & CNN-- to: correct? 
This woman up now is all up in it for OSHA being powerful for this mandate
This woman up now is all up in it for OSHA being powerful for this mandate
This post was edited on 1/7/22 at 10:13 am
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:12 am to MMauler
quote:
First, whether or not the "vaccine" works should always be a consideration
There is no legal basis for this argument.
None.
The only questions that should be presented to the court:
1. Is an individual sovereign over their body? (If no, Roe v. Wade should be nuked immediately)
2. Does OSHA have plenary legal authority to issue mandates such as this?
End of conversation. Full stop.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:13 am to Indefatigable
The plaintiff sucked. I'll be shocked if this gets overturned. F the supreme court. Trumps picks suck.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:13 am to AmishSamurai
I can’t believe I’m listening to this. This is fricking madness.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:13 am to Indefatigable
Plaintiffs could have done a better job. It was just our liberty they were arguing.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:13 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I was referring to contentious, political cases, but you are right I shouldn't have phrased it that way.
Nature of the beast considering how the justices are appointed. I don't really see that as an inherently negative thing and don't really understand how its used as an attack against the Court.
Of course the contentious cases that straddle ideological lines are going to be closer than the ones that don't.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:14 am to cajunangelle
Boy, this fn bitch....nails on a chalkboard.
Posted on 1/7/22 at 10:14 am to Indefatigable
Plaintiffs are the two states, yes?
Page 9 of 27
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News