Started By
Message

re: U.S. commits to help Ukraine for 10 more yrs

Posted on 6/13/24 at 11:23 am to
Posted by Jspaspa3303
Member since Jun 2020
2922 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 11:23 am to
Anyone at this point can’t see this as a money laundering operation , and a way for these politicians and their buddies to line their pockets with your money is a complete buffoon . Just like Iraq, we will spend all this money and have nothing to show for it . War is money for these people .
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
37839 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Let's pretend this is true

Why in the world do we need to commit to 10 years for a war? That would be like committing money until 1953 during the battle of the bulge.


To avoid this spreading further and actually having boots on the ground. It is better to keep this at the modern version of the Lend Lease Act rather than our men and women dying over there. I'm not as polarized as the other posters making angry comments. It is possible that both sides are correct as far as this board goes.
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
34071 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 11:25 am to
Meanwhile the I-10 bridge in Lake Charles is closed, because it’s crumbling.

I would like to thank both Louisiana Senators for their continued support of Ukraine
Posted by kilo
No block, no rock
Member since Oct 2011
29608 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 11:25 am to
quote:

What would the US reaction if Russia prepared to set up military bases along our Mexico border?


Bingo. The NATO membership push for Ukraine played a huge part in all of this and many refuse to acknowledge.
Posted by Jack Carter
Member since Sep 2018
12200 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 11:29 am to
quote:

It is a necessary evil at this point


Not true at all.

quote:

but on the other hand Putin isn't going to stop with Ukraine


This is also not true. This could have ended with the peace treaty that Zelensky refused to sign because Boris told him not to. A peace treaty could be signed within days and Russia will not go any further.

You don't know anything, brother.
This post was edited on 6/13/24 at 11:33 am
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
37839 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Bingo. The NATO membership push for Ukraine played a huge part in all of this and many refuse to acknowledge.


Was this an escalation? Technically, yes. It was also NATO actually doing something to say we aren't going to let you keep invading. The invasion of Crimea and the Euromaidan protests are more than likely what kicked this off.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116658 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Putin isn't going to stop with Ukraine


Yes, and in the 1980s the press explained that we must spend more money to find a cure for AIDS now because it was going to morph into an airborne disease and kill all the heteros.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 11:33 am to
quote:

It is a necessary evil at this point.


No it is not.
This post was edited on 6/13/24 at 11:35 am
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
37839 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Regardless, it's not our problem! We've spent years funding and preparing NATO for this event.


You know we wouldn't all of a sudden stop funding NATO, correct?

quote:

Let Europe deal with their own problems. It's not worth our money or American lives. The US motivation has nothing to do with any honorable reason.


Article V matters and it isn't just our blood that would be spilled. Disagree with me all you want but those two points should give you pause

quote:

if Russia prepared to set up military bases along our Mexico border?


How far away do you think Cuba is?
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
17666 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 11:48 am to
If the amount they plan to commit for 10 years hasn’t already been approved by Congress, null and void.

We need a state governor with balls to find a way to take this to SCOTUS as unconstitutional.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
14996 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

but on the other hand DC isn't going to stop with Ukraine.

Are you behind funding genital mutilation studies in Pakistan for the next decade too?
Posted by momentoftruth87
Your mom
Member since Oct 2013
86110 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 12:13 pm to
I’d rather ww3
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
30543 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

It is a necessary evil at this point


No, it most certainly is not necessary but it is evil...
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
13409 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 12:17 pm to
At this point the best thing for America is for Russia to win quickly.


The MIC must spend money and I guess they can’t drag us into a war so now we must fund wars that don’t involve us.

Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
10234 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Just google Putin's track record of invasions


I did. I didn't see an invasion of a single NATO country. I didn't see any invasion that was used as a springboard to invade another country.

I did see Putin saying for years that NATO involvement in Ukraine was a line in the sand, which means Putin is doing exactly what he said he would. Also, all of Putin's invasions (which is 2) you are using to support your argument were in the opposite direction from Europe.

1. Chechnya - the invasion started after radical islamist terrorists killed civilians in Russia. Not even remotely close to the same as invading Europe.

2. Georgia - essentially a civil war with one group siding with Russia. Russia invaded after NATO tried to interfere and push for Georgia membership. Sound familiar?

So we have 3 Russian invasions. One to fight terrorism and two to prevent NATO from having a new country on their borders. None of these even remotely suggest that Putin is looking to invade European countries that are already in NATO.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61849 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

on the other hand Putin isn't going to stop with Ukraine


sheep
Posted by AndyCBR
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2012
8072 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Lol. That worked so well in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Egypt.


Salient point.

Our previous record at “Nation Building” is absolute shite.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103104 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 12:54 pm to
Put a hold on it, let the government fall, no more party to the agreement.

Similar to what the Dems did to South Vietnam except we won’t feel bad about leaving Ukraine out to dry.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103104 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Yes, and in the 1980s the press explained that we must spend more money to find a cure for AIDS now because it was going to morph into an airborne disease and kill all the heteros.


Well, we now have trannies targeting straight people for death, so…
Posted by toratiger
susukino
Member since Aug 2008
3348 posts
Posted on 6/13/24 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Putin isn't going to stop with Ukraine



The government said the same thing about Viet Nam. Its called the domino
theory. Each will fall one after the other. Same BS ...different day.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram