- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Upstate NY man receives ICE warning about social media posts
Posted on 7/7/26 at 7:46 am
Posted on 7/7/26 at 7:46 am
LINK
A New York resident is suing after officers went to his home to serve him with a warning after he sent an email criticizing Immigration and Customs Enforcement leadership over the agency's tactics in immigration raids.
David Streever, a U.S. citizen in Rochester, filed the lawsuit on Monday in Washington, D.C., against the Department of Homeland Security and ICE, arguing that officials violated his First Amendment right to speak out against the government, according to the complaint reviewed by Fox News Digital.
Streever was on a trip to Finland with his 7-year-old daughter last month when two officers showed up to his home and handed his wife a warning notice informing him that an email he sent months earlier was considered a threat. He had sent an email in January to Todd Lyons, who was the acting director of ICE at the time, after an ICE agent shot and killed U.S. citizen Renee Nicole Good during an immigration raid in Minneapolis.
In the email, Streever told Lyons he was "a monstrous human being" who "will never know peace" and will "go down in history as America's Reinhard Heydrich, the butcher," a reference to a Nazi leader. "The way you are protecting the obvious execution in Minnesota, even as we see the videos, will lead to your downfall. Even Trump will turn on you before the end, and you will be a sad, despised man who eats himself alive with shame at your own pathetic weakness," Streever said in the email, according to the complaint.
"You will seek to lose yourself, to escape the burden of knowing the truth about yourself. But wherever you go, you will find yourself. You will torment yourself until your last day on Earth," the email added.
When officers arrived at his home, Streever's wife answered the door and was handed a "warning notice" explaining that her husband "may be in violation of federal law" for sending his email to ICE's former acting director. The notice, reviewed by Fox News Digital, urges Streever to "promptly remove and/or discontinue" his "behavior," warning that the notice will be "taken into consideration" if he continues to be involved" in "criminal activities."
Streever's wife told the officers he was out of the country but would return to Rochester later that week, according to the lawsuit. But federal officers did not wait and instead attempted to confront him at a New York City hotel after he returned from Finland, although they were turned away by hotel staff. That same night, officers repeatedly called Streever's phone, leaving voicemails identifying themselves only as Homeland Security Investigations.
Adam Steinbaugh, an attorney with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression who is representing Streever, argued the email was protected speech under the First Amendment and does not represent a legitimate threat. "If someone is really threatening a government official, you don't wait five months to act on it," Steinbaugh said in a statement. "The fact that authorities didn't respond immediately shows that David presented no threat. This pursuit is designed to intimidate lawful speech, pure and simple."
"I cherish our right to speak openly about issues of public concern," Streever said. "I hope others will not be discouraged from peacefully expressing their views, even when those views are critical of the government."
A New York resident is suing after officers went to his home to serve him with a warning after he sent an email criticizing Immigration and Customs Enforcement leadership over the agency's tactics in immigration raids.
David Streever, a U.S. citizen in Rochester, filed the lawsuit on Monday in Washington, D.C., against the Department of Homeland Security and ICE, arguing that officials violated his First Amendment right to speak out against the government, according to the complaint reviewed by Fox News Digital.
Streever was on a trip to Finland with his 7-year-old daughter last month when two officers showed up to his home and handed his wife a warning notice informing him that an email he sent months earlier was considered a threat. He had sent an email in January to Todd Lyons, who was the acting director of ICE at the time, after an ICE agent shot and killed U.S. citizen Renee Nicole Good during an immigration raid in Minneapolis.
In the email, Streever told Lyons he was "a monstrous human being" who "will never know peace" and will "go down in history as America's Reinhard Heydrich, the butcher," a reference to a Nazi leader. "The way you are protecting the obvious execution in Minnesota, even as we see the videos, will lead to your downfall. Even Trump will turn on you before the end, and you will be a sad, despised man who eats himself alive with shame at your own pathetic weakness," Streever said in the email, according to the complaint.
"You will seek to lose yourself, to escape the burden of knowing the truth about yourself. But wherever you go, you will find yourself. You will torment yourself until your last day on Earth," the email added.
When officers arrived at his home, Streever's wife answered the door and was handed a "warning notice" explaining that her husband "may be in violation of federal law" for sending his email to ICE's former acting director. The notice, reviewed by Fox News Digital, urges Streever to "promptly remove and/or discontinue" his "behavior," warning that the notice will be "taken into consideration" if he continues to be involved" in "criminal activities."
Streever's wife told the officers he was out of the country but would return to Rochester later that week, according to the lawsuit. But federal officers did not wait and instead attempted to confront him at a New York City hotel after he returned from Finland, although they were turned away by hotel staff. That same night, officers repeatedly called Streever's phone, leaving voicemails identifying themselves only as Homeland Security Investigations.
Adam Steinbaugh, an attorney with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression who is representing Streever, argued the email was protected speech under the First Amendment and does not represent a legitimate threat. "If someone is really threatening a government official, you don't wait five months to act on it," Steinbaugh said in a statement. "The fact that authorities didn't respond immediately shows that David presented no threat. This pursuit is designed to intimidate lawful speech, pure and simple."
"I cherish our right to speak openly about issues of public concern," Streever said. "I hope others will not be discouraged from peacefully expressing their views, even when those views are critical of the government."
Posted on 7/7/26 at 7:49 am to Eurocat
So some dipshit made threats and is confused about his "free speech"? He also wasn't arrested or charged, just warned. So uh, good luck I guess.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 7:51 am to Eurocat
quote:
Adam Steinbaugh, an attorney with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression who is representing Streever, argued the email was protected speech under the First Amendment and does not represent a legitimate threat. "If someone is really threatening a government official, you don't wait five months to act on it," Steinbaugh said in a statement. "The fact that authorities didn't respond immediately shows that David presented no threat. This pursuit is designed to intimidate lawful speech, pure and simple."
Sounds like a money grab. When you make a threat, they have the duty to investigate it and it matters not if the threat is not acted upon immediately. If you see/hear something, you don't wait til after the threat has been carried out. Threats are not lawful speech.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 7:51 am to Eurocat
quote:
Upstate NY man receives ICE warning about social media posts
This bothers me. Not as much as 40 million people being encouraged by federal politicians to break federal law, but still it bothers me.
Which bothers you more?
Posted on 7/7/26 at 7:52 am to Eurocat
At least he wasn’t put in prison for praying in front of an abortion clinic.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 7:54 am to Eurocat
Do you get embarrassed posting nonsense like this?
Posted on 7/7/26 at 7:56 am to Eurocat
Liberals have nothing, so they post this shite. It's pathetic.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 7:58 am to Eurocat
Hes crying after making threats via email
You leftards are so stupid
You leftards are so stupid
Posted on 7/7/26 at 7:59 am to Eurocat
Liberals don’t understand free speech and free speech without consequences. But somehow they think the 2nd amendment strictly limits your firearms.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:09 am to Eurocat
quote:
"a monstrous human being"
quote:
"will never know peace"
quote:
"go down in history as America's Reinhard Heydrich, the butcher,"
quote:
"The way you are protecting the obvious execution in Minnesota, even as we see the videos, will lead to your downfall. Even Trump will turn on you before the end, and you will be a sad, despised man who eats himself alive with shame at your own pathetic weakness,"
quote:
"You will seek to lose yourself, to escape the burden of knowing the truth about yourself. But wherever you go, you will find yourself. You will torment yourself until your last day on Earth,"
This is all protected speech. Agree or disagree with the opinion, but being able to criticize our government agents is the most sacred aspect of freedom of speech.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:09 am to Tigergreg
quote:
When you make a threat
What threat was made?
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:10 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Hes crying after making threats via email
What was the threat?
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:10 am to onmymedicalgrind
That isn’t the entire email, so until that’s posted hard to know if he made threats or not.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:13 am to Big4SALTbro
Why would they purposely not quote the worst part of the emails? Based on the information available in the OP....where's the threat?
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:18 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Why would they purposely not quote the worst part of the emails? Based on the information available in the OP....where's the threat?
I’m with you on this. Nothing provided even remotely constitutes a threat.
Either there’s way more that was intentionally withheld to spark outrage, or ICE way overstepped.
Odds are it’s the former.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:18 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Why would they purposely not quote the worst part of the emails? Based on the information available in the OP....where's the threat?
The threat doesn't look to be there. But we should look at the bright side, at least it wasn't the FBI that visited his wife. Just as little as 3 years ago, the FBI was killing people for perceived threats over the internet.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:20 am to onmymedicalgrind
Oh why would the media lie? Mostly because we know they are dishonest scumbags that don’t actually report news but spin news.
It’s easy enough to post the entire email.
Everyone agrees that any politician or really Gov worker can be a titty baby and cry that someone threatened them even if it wasn’t a threat.
I actually think it should be protected, as in you don’t go to jail or get fined for it, however I don’t see an issue with saying here is a warning you are on the line here and of course putting someone on a watch list to make sure they don’t act out the threat. Pretty similar to how the secret service would pay people visits.
It’s easy enough to post the entire email.
Everyone agrees that any politician or really Gov worker can be a titty baby and cry that someone threatened them even if it wasn’t a threat.
I actually think it should be protected, as in you don’t go to jail or get fined for it, however I don’t see an issue with saying here is a warning you are on the line here and of course putting someone on a watch list to make sure they don’t act out the threat. Pretty similar to how the secret service would pay people visits.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:23 am to UtahCajun
Yea delivering a warning note even if it’s sensitive baby if for one of the rare times the media wasn’t being deceitful in what it shared, is better than Biden having his fbi kill people.
Hard to make any judgement based on the source, how the left is and the fact we don’t have the full email for some reason.
Hard to make any judgement based on the source, how the left is and the fact we don’t have the full email for some reason.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:27 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
onmymedicalgrind
You assholes are insufferable.
Posted on 7/7/26 at 8:27 am to Eurocat
quote:
"I cherish our right to speak openly about issues of public concern,"
Except it wasn’t openly. They were sent directly to an individual via email with overtly threatening language about future events.
Popular
Back to top

17






