- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TX School District Faces Federal Dep. of Education Investigation for Throwing Gay Porn Out
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:59 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 12/22/22 at 4:59 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Nothing more than one group of people seeking to impose their personal views upon others who do not share them.
Sums up the LGBTQ movement
0
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:00 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
That is a matter of interpretation
No it isn't. It's a matter of fact. Anything else is a matter of insane extrapolation.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:03 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
“It’s the transgender, LGBTQ ... sexuality ... in books,” he said, according to a recording of his comments.
Are you seriously trying to make a numbered point with a quote like that?
"I... like... young... kids..."
- AggieHank86
Just because a book contains an LGBTQ character doesn't mean it also doesn't contain sexual content that's inappropriate for children.
If I've learned anything about LGBTQ pride, its the more dildos and exposed arse cheeks the more authentic you're being. I have little doubt many (most?) of those books are not appropriate for children, as I've seen the sort of content "family-friendly" gay parades and tranny shows contain.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:06 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Those are the facts. Let the downvotes and childish insults flow.
Was it you that was stating a bit back ... When the DA for Madison WI promised not to prosecute anyone that "violated" new abortion laws? On the primise that ... It's ok not to uphold the law because if the voters really wanted the law upheld they would vote the DA out
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:07 pm to Azkiger
quote:I linked the article. Go read it. The guy was speaking out loud with pauses and repetition, so I cleaned up his language a little bit for readability.
Are you seriously trying to make a numbered point with a quote like that?
quote:true. And a committee comprised of local parents reviewed the books and disagreed with the superintendent’s assessment of the “pornographic“ content.
Just because a book contains an LGBTQ character doesn't mean it also doesn't contain sexual content that's inappropriate for children.
In Granbury, Texas, I rather doubt that any of those parents were LGB activists.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:07 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
2. The books that this superintendent removed do NOT appear to have been pornography, but rather all books related in any way to sexual orientation and/or transgender issues. Texas Tribune
How angry are you about this
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:10 pm to loogaroo
If you want to keep the feds out of your schools, stop accepting federal funds. It’s just that simple.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:11 pm to thebigmuffaletta
I was just gonna post that and there you go 2 frick tards chime in
When the frick is SOMEBODY gonna say enough is enough with this shite
When the frick is SOMEBODY gonna say enough is enough with this shite
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:11 pm to SuperOcean
quote:Not exactly. I think it was Florida, and what I said was that there’s always a certain amount of prosecutorial discretion, and it is easy enough for the local citizenry to replace a prosecutor who does not exercise that discretion in a manner consistent with local mores.
Was it you that was stating a bit back ... When the DA for Madison WI promised not to prosecute anyone that "violated" new abortion laws? On the primise that ... It's ok not to uphold the law because if the voters really wanted the law upheld they would vote the DA out
“School superintendent“ is not an elected position in Texas. The local citizenry corrected the superintendent it in the manner that was available to them (committee). A small minority filed criminal charges against the district for reinstating most of these books, as directed by that committee.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:11 pm to Cobra Tate
quote:
How angry are you about this
He jumps in these threads with a quickness.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:12 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Unlawful discrimination and deprivation of equal protection both offend me.
There's no porn for any kids, yet in your world, not having gay porn is discrimination?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:14 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
In Granbury, Texas, I rather doubt that any of those parents were LGB activists.
It's basically a suburb of Fort Worth. I'm sure it's full of groomers.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:15 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:There was no porn at all. Again, stop relying on a slanted article from a slanted publication. Look at what actually happened.
There's no porn for any kids, yet in your world, not having gay porn is discrimination?
A committee of local resudents reinstated the vast majority of these books, because there WAS no pornography.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:17 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
There was no porn at all.
Not a matter of fact.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:17 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Those are the facts. Let the downvotes and childish insults flow.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:18 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
There's no porn for any kids, yet in your world, not having gay porn is discrimination?
I’ve heard more than one groomer argue drawings of children engaging in sexual acts isn’t pornography because it doesn’t depict real people.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:18 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:It is a small town of 10,000 people, located more than 30 miles from Fort Worth.
It's basically a suburb of Fort Worth. I'm sure it's full of groomers.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:19 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
It is a small town of 10,000 people, located more than 30 miles from Fort Worth.
I know and I'm correct.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:21 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:no, you are not.
It is a small town of 10,000 people, located more than 30 miles from Fort Worth.quote:
I know and I'm correct.
MAYBE it is close enough to be considered an exburb.
You people see monsters under every bed, and “groomers“ in every closet. There’s no point trying to talk sense into you.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 5:22 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
no, you are not. MAYBE it is close enough to be considered an exburb.
As in 100 percent of our exchanges , I'm correct and you're wrong.
And you've presented opinions as facts and discarded facts as opinions in your usual personal lunatic style.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News