- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TX School District Faces Federal Dep. of Education Investigation for Throwing Gay Porn Out
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:20 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:20 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
do you know who selected the parents to be on this committee?
0
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:20 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Your reading comprehension is… limited.
Think about it. If you have not figured it out by morning, perhaps I’ll be generous and explain it to you
Think about it. If you have not figured it out by morning, perhaps I’ll be generous and explain it to you
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:24 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Your reading comprehension is… limited.
My reading comprehension skills are just fine. Your lying skills, however, are not very good.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:26 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
you claim that it is a ”woke” suburb of Fort Worth
What the frick?
Never happened you lunatic.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:30 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:A summary of the completed review includes:
So some of the books in fact contained porn?
131 books under review at the start of the process
116 books returned to library shelves
3 books designated for removal because of sexually explicit content or illustrations
6 books confirmed lost and not in school libraries
3 books incorrectly listed and not in school libraries
3 books were duplicate titles on original list
LINK
The three removed books:
Out of Darkness. Heterosexual, interracial teen relationship
This Book is Gay. Obvious
We are the Ants. Gay teen whose boyfriend has died
Based upon the reviews, none seem to be overtly pornographic.
This post was edited on 12/23/22 at 5:59 am
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:31 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
do you know who selected the parents to be on this committee?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:32 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:My bad. Your actual claim was that Granbury is “full of groomers”quote:What the frick? Never happened you lunatic.
you claim that it is a ”woke” suburb of Fort Worth
quote:
It's basically a suburb of Fort Worth. I'm sure it's full of groomers.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:33 pm to AggieHank86
You said in an earlier post that if the books had contained pornography they would have stayed banned. In fact some books did stay banned. By the criteria you set forth they in fact did find books containing pornography.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:42 pm to Bulldogblitz
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:43 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:OK, I will show you some mercy, since you clearly cannot read English.
You said in an earlier post that if the books had contained pornography they would have stayed banned. In fact some books did stay banned. By the criteria you set forth they in fact did find books containing pornography.
I also did not say that the ONLY reason that a book might stay banned was the inclusion of overt pornography. You incorrectly inferred that.
As set forth above, only three books remained banned. None seems to have contained overt pornography.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:45 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
You incorrectly inferred that.
I inferred nothing. Your post doesn’t mention any other reason those books would have stayed banned other than containing pornography.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:50 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:Apparently, Google lies outside your skill set.
jimmy the leg
quote:Hood County News
members will be selected by GISD administration in cooperation with the Board of Trustees. Meador said that parents and members of the community who are interested in serving or providing input to the committee may send an email to GISD administration.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:53 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:in·fer
You incorrectly inferred that.quote:
I inferred nothing. Your post doesn’t mention any other reason
/in'f?r/
verb
deduce or conclude (information) from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 9:56 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 9:57 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
deduce or conclude (information) from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements.
But you made an explicit statement “if the books had contained pornography, they would have stayed banned”. I’m simply using the criteria for which you stated the books would be banned. You’d might have a point if you listed other reasons, but you didn’t.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 10:01 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Whatever you do for a living does not involve much reading or writing, does it?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 10:02 pm to loogaroo
Granbury/Glen Rose don’t frick around. this could get ugly. hopefully it does. a line in the sand has to be drawn at some point
Posted on 12/22/22 at 10:03 pm to AggieHank86
Whatever you do for a living does not involve much honesty, does it?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 10:04 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Your actual claim was that Granbury is “full of groomers”
Thank you.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 10:10 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:It involves the precise use of the English language.
Whatever you do for a living does not involve much honesty, does it?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 10:13 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
It involves the precise use of the English language.
Like making statements that say; “if the books had been pornographic, they would have stayed banned”?
Those are your precise words that you now refuse to own up to.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 10:15 pm
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News