- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tucker Goes There With WTC Building 7 Discussion
Posted on 5/1/23 at 1:44 pm to thermal9221
Posted on 5/1/23 at 1:44 pm to thermal9221
quote:
Based on the 3 pics I’m supposed to believe the art angle?
The "Art Angle" gets into Halliburton and Cheney, who was VP at the time.
The AV of the professional firefighters discussing the perfectly timed explosions with additional dialogue related to the fact the building fell so fast is proof the building had to have timed explosives to fall so quickly.
Think terminal velocity without interruption due to the timing of the explosives. To believe a building falls that rapidly, naturally, I will not ever be able to get there.
1
Posted on 5/1/23 at 1:50 pm to thermal9221
quote:
I don’t know why not, who gives a shite why not.
You asked for evidence. I have you evidence.
quote:
If it was reasonable then I would give it a thought.
If you had a rudimentary science or engineering background you'd understand the two links I posted are very reasonable.
quote:
If the planes didn’t crash were they going to detonate the fuse assemblies anyway?
Of course the planes crashed. They were caught on video.
quote:
Based on the 3 pics I’m supposed to believe the art angle?
What Israeli art students carry boxes of detonators with them?
And have any of these art student been interviewed subsequently to 911?
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:00 pm to Timeoday
So the conspiracy is that the guy bought insurance to cover a terrorist attack on a place that had already experienced a terrorist attack not 8 years prior?
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:10 pm to GoblinGuide
quote:
So the conspiracy is that the guy bought insurance to cover a terrorist attack on a place that had already experienced a terrorist attack not 8 years prior?
The conspiracy is 911 was a CIA/Mossad initiative. Primary motivation? Trillions of dollars. After 22 years, goal more than achieved.
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:15 pm to GumboPot
How retarded are both you and the op?
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:23 pm to thermal9221
So ad hom and no substance so far. This topic seems too emotional for you to discuss rationally.
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:30 pm to GumboPot
quote:
The conspiracy is 911 was a CIA/Mossad initiative. Primary motivation? Trillions of dollars. After 22 years, goal more than achieved.
Yeah but that's not what Tucker was saying in the OP. He wasn't really "going there" at all.
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:39 pm to GoblinGuide
quote:
Yeah but that's not what Tucker was saying in the OP.
Right. Tucker was just talking about the strong desire by mainstream media management and their lackies to shut down debate on the subject.
I wasn't responding to Tucker's comment.
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:39 pm to Timeoday
Sept 11th wasn’t the only time someone tried to destroy the WTC, having terrorist insurance should not be unusual… 
This post was edited on 5/1/23 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:40 pm to Timeoday
What I don't understand is how one single plane can destroy a building that size in such a short amount of time?
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:42 pm to dchog
quote:
What I don't understand is how one single plane can destroy a building that size in such a short amount of time?
So you're saying there may have been something in addition to the plane? Go on...
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:42 pm to dchog
The planes only did enough damage for the building to ultimately destroyed itself..
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:44 pm to GumboPot
Nice to see Tucker moving on from FOX and their election denial lawsuit to dip his toe into something normal and sophisticated like *checks notes* 9/11 conspiracy theories
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:45 pm to GumboPot
I don't know. I just don't believe a plane would do that to one of the largest buildings in the world.
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:47 pm to dchog
You don’t have to “believe” it, it happened
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:48 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Tucker moving on from FOX and their election denial lawsuit
If you are referring to the Dominion case and FWIW Tucker was used as a witness for Dominion. Tucker did not promote the assertions against Dominion.
quote:
sophisticated like *checks notes* 9/11 conspiracy theories
What 911 conspiracy theory did Tucker bring up in the video in the OP?
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:53 pm to Timeoday
When did Tucker make that short video clip? Was it taken out of context and edited?
I have never really looked into 911 theories; but wasn't Building 7 always said to have been a planned demolition because of structural damage?
I have never really looked into 911 theories; but wasn't Building 7 always said to have been a planned demolition because of structural damage?
Posted on 5/1/23 at 2:57 pm to dchog
quote:
don't know. I just don't believe a plane would do that to one of the largest buildings in the world.
Posted on 5/1/23 at 3:14 pm to Timeoday
Steel*clap*Beams*clap*Can’t*clap*
Melt*clap*Jet*clap*Fuel*clap*
Melt*clap*Jet*clap*Fuel*clap*
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News