Started By
Message

re: Tucker Goes There With WTC Building 7 Discussion

Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:26 am to
Posted by John Coctostan
Member since May 2018
558 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:26 am to
Of course, a terrorist attack on the WTC was totally unforeseeable at the time.
Posted by TheSadvocate
North Shore
Member since Aug 2020
3836 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Poor guy, on top of the world one day and pandering to droolers the next.



he's worth $500 million and will probably get $100 million from whomever he goes to work for next, whenever he's ready... I'm pretty sure he's not losing sleep over your opinion.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
9128 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:31 am to
In the OP post the link will provide details about Art Students.
Very interesting cover I might add.
Posted by JackieTreehorn
Malibu
Member since Sep 2013
29219 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:36 am to
Well Mr 6 posts I guess I’m done with Redacted since you shared your expert opinion.
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
13313 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 10:39 am to
quote:

I've watched a few of his shows and let's just say he plays loose and fast with a lot of facts. He takes very simple information and extrapolates it into wild theories.


I watch them daily.
Like any show, some truth in there. Obviously runs wild with conspiracies.
Anyone that takes that show and accepts it as truth should be caned.
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
13313 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 11:22 am to
quote:

the OP post the link will provide details about Art Students. Very interesting cover I might add.


That’s the most retarded shite I’ve ever seen.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119051 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 11:43 am to
In that Twitter thread here is video of building 7 detonation devices going off before collapse. LINK

Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
13313 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 11:48 am to
Jesus that video is fake.
Do you believe in dog people too?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124234 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 11:58 am to
quote:




Yeah. It's not like there was a known desire in the terrorist world to destroy the WTC, right?
quote:

The 1993 World Trade Center bombing was a terrorist attack carried out on February 26, 1993, when a van bomb detonated below the North Tower of the World Trade Center complex in New York City. The 1,336 lb (606 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device was intended to send the North Tower crashing into its twin, the South Tower, down both skyscrapers and killing tens of thousands of people. It failed to do so, but murdered six people, including a pregnant woman, and caused over a thousand injuries. About 50,000 people were evacuated from the buildings that day


On 9/11, WTC7 was RIDDLED with a debris blast as the towers collapsed. Red hot shrapnel, some the size of small car, blew through the base of that building.
Posted by Schleynole
Member since Sep 2022
458 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

So what happened?

That was a joke from Tommy Boy. Whatever happened, it wasn't because a plane hit another building.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
9128 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 12:21 pm to
Obviously Tucker is over a target. You should be fine.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119051 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

In the OP post the link will provide details about Art Students.


When online deep sate defenders say stuff like, "it would have taken several workers to install detonation devices and we would have noticed all the activity".

Then when you point out the "art students" from Israel activity in around the WTC building and in pictures with boxes of detonation devices, "oh, that's different".

Were any of these "art students" interviewed subsequent to 911?
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
60766 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 12:34 pm to
Anyone who buys the entire 9/11 explanation from our government without so much as questioning a single facet of it is not someone I care to associate with. Not willingly.
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
13313 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

That was a joke from Tommy Boy.


Ha
The conveyor scene.

quote:

it wasn’t because a plane hit another building.


Whack
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119051 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

What evidence do you have of this?


High-Temperature Thermitic Reactions

quote:

We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approxi-mately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms oc-curring at approximately 43C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.


Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
60766 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Silverstein? Sounds Episcopalian.


You'll need a Truth Social account to view the video, but it's worth your time. When someone tells you who they are, believe them.
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
13313 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 1:24 pm to
Uhh yeah I’m gonna go with a jet crashing into a huge building causing massive fire aiding in the collapse of the two towers as the explanation.

Not some fricking mossad agents posing as art students.

It’s amazing they never found any explosive material in the 4th target. Or did they……
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119051 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

Uhh yeah I’m gonna go with a jet crashing into a huge building causing massive fire aiding in the collapse of the two towers as the explanation.


Why not both?



quote:

It’s amazing they never found any explosive material in the 4th target.


What was the 4th target?
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
13313 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Why not both?


I don’t know why not, who gives a shite why not.
If it was reasonable then I would give it a thought.
It’s not reasonable. If the planes didn’t crash were they going to detonate the fuse assemblies anyway? Based on the 3 pics I’m supposed to believe the art angle? JFC
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
29182 posts
Posted on 5/1/23 at 1:38 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram