Started By
Message

re: Tucker Goes There With WTC Building 7 Discussion

Posted on 5/2/23 at 6:58 pm to
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22561 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 6:58 pm to
Insisting that terrorism was covered under the policy doesn't seem odd at all when you remember the 1998 van bombing at WTC. It was a known target.
Posted by Little Trump
Florida
Member since Nov 2017
5817 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

Pretty amazing when you think about it. They could not have fallen more neatly into their own footprint if it was an expertly planned demolition. What are the odds? All three buildings fell perfectly. Commercial demolition experts still have problems with grain silos.


^^^
Yes

WTC 7 was a perfect controlled demolition, can’t be argued by anyone with demolition knowledge

But Twin Towers demolition, both buildings falling in footprints, was a thing of beauty for anyone that performs controlled demolitions on high rises

That’s why Tucker says people get literally attacked for questioning such events

If Twin Towers collapse would’ve been caused solely by planes, then those Towers would’ve done untold damage to NYC skyline, and no insurance company could have handled that loss.
Posted by Little Trump
Florida
Member since Nov 2017
5817 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

I still want to know what happened at MGM in Vegas at that country Concert


Me too

Why do these shooters always die and then can no longer be questioned?
Posted by berrycajun
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2016
6907 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 7:06 pm to
I went down the art students rabbit hole after pedogate. Basically i went down ALLLL the rabbit holes in 3 years and then after the 2020 election decided we are screwed. Quit watching the news and am now just waiting for the people to get fed up. Don’t think it will be until the govt tries a legit door to door gun grab or bans selling them.

Back to the art students. I remember spending a few hours looking into it and being like ooooo this is interesting. I saw the helicopters blah blah blah. Was totally convinced but then i was like but WHY???
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57412 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

I'll give you the 1st two but that doesn't explain why the 3rd one fell at free fall speed.
What would change the acceleration of gravity?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57412 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

A metallurgist would know structural steel begins to weaken at 800°F. Above 1100°F the weakening can be catastrophic. At ~2500°F, steel melts.
Too high. Steel starts derating at about 250°F
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57412 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

The antenna’s movement: The antenna on the North Tower dropped first. This means the building’s core failed before the exterior did — contrary to NIST’s collapse scenario.
Nonsense. It would indicate beam loads failed first. Give t the construction of the building… that’s sensible.

If the beams failed first, which would the columns fail? Inward or outward?
Posted by Little Trump
Florida
Member since Nov 2017
5817 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

If people choose to ignore the trail of destruction caused by the same people who created the FED & the Bolshevik Revolution, then I can’t have an intellectual conversation with you.


My friend and I do research and just call deniers “stupid people” which our country had a strong majority of but they now are beginning to believe us in my opinion
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57412 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

What are the odds?

damn near 100%.

quote:

All three buildings fell perfectly.
Go get a Bud Light can. Stand on it. Have your friend pluck it. Does it tip over sideways?

quote:

Commercial demolition experts still have problems with grain silos.
Different construction. And getting tho gs to fall sideways is actually much harder. You need a lateral force to push it sideways, and the structure has to be stiff ina direction it’s not designed to be stiff in.
This post was edited on 5/2/23 at 7:18 pm
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
65415 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

Poor guy, on top of the world one day and pandering to droolers the next.


“The collapse of building 7 is strange. I just wanted to ask-“

“DROOLER!!!111”

Useless frick.
Posted by mb6355
Member since Apr 2020
199 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 7:24 pm to
Thermite cut
Posted by Little Trump
Florida
Member since Nov 2017
5817 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

Thermite cut


Most, without construction experience have no clue of what this is, unfortunately

If they did, sabotage couldn’t be denied
Posted by 2020_reVISION
Richmond,VA
Member since Dec 2020
3048 posts
Posted on 5/3/23 at 12:08 am to
YouTubeVideo...
9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate

Blog & discussion from whence the video came...
911Blogger.com

Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124234 posts
Posted on 5/3/23 at 7:26 am to
quote:

But Twin Towers demolition, both buildings falling in footprints, was a thing of beauty for anyone that performs controlled demolitions on high rises
So well controlled in fact, that not a single lower story explosive charge was evident.

Here is what a skyscraper controlled demolition looks like.



or this ...



or this ...



Notice the simultaneous explosions up and down the structure?




----




Here is the instant WTC2 collapsed.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
9128 posts
Posted on 5/3/23 at 7:33 am to
quote:

the trail of destruction caused by the same people who created the FED & the Bolshevik Revolution


Posted by Schleynole
Member since Sep 2022
458 posts
Posted on 5/3/23 at 7:41 am to
quote:

What would change the acceleration of gravity?




Only certain portions of the building was on fire. The whole building shouldn't have gave way like it did because of office fires. It has never happened before or since. We've seen buildings burn for hours and not collapse.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34971 posts
Posted on 5/3/23 at 7:44 am to
It’s been explained a million times over for like 20 fricking years, anyone who is still “just asking questions” has made up their mind and is just trying to appeal to the gullible fricks like the ones in this thread.
Posted by BjornIronside
Member since May 2023
116 posts
Posted on 5/3/23 at 7:48 am to
Did you vote for this current admin?
Posted by Schleynole
Member since Sep 2022
458 posts
Posted on 5/3/23 at 8:30 am to
quote:

been explained a million times over for like 20 fricking years,

By the same people that claim Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy. I don't trust those people.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram