- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trumps truth social post about Iran
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:33 pm to joshnorris14
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:33 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
His spin is too retarded to be impressive
Even if you want to frame this as 83D Candyland to hurt Europe, that hurts us. If Europe, China, SA, etc. hurt economically it affects our economy negatively too
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:34 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
We could open it tomorrow.
I'm not taking sides in this fight, but watch this clip of Rubio (I queued it up). He seems like he doesn't know WTF to do about the Strait.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:34 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
And so, all we seem to have shown the world is that we can’t guarantee the Strait’s security if things get squirrelly with Iran even if we have huge naval and aerial superiority. That’s a W for Tehran
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:34 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Of course this retard
quote:
AlterEd

Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:35 pm to lsuguy84
Who would have ever predicted AlterEd simps for the Deep State?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:35 pm to Indefatigable
quote:Then "everyone" is a collection of idiots. Trump has telegraphed that punch ... repeatedly.
The problem is that everyone knows we won’t.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
Everyone who paid attention
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
Anyone who reads his posts. Biggest stooge there is.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
We escorted ships through the SOH and there was nothing Iran could do about it. You know why? Because we sank their fukn navy, you idiot.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:37 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
You speak as if said resolve is past-tense
By all indications the end is imminent and the result is not favorable for us.
If we do not end up paying reparations, if they cease to enrich uranium and we keep the same or enhance sanctions I will admit that i was wrong OR if we go in guns blazing and take kharg island.
I notice you won’t put your lines in the sand on what constitutes a bad deal and taking a L in SFPs thread…
Ready to spin on trumps command
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:37 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
we seem to have shown the world is that we can’t guarantee the Strait’s security

Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
I’m trying to put together how any resolution here can be a win for the United States.
Unless everyone’s hiding the ball and Iran is giving up the uranium, basically any term possible is worse than status quo ante.
The party line will be “but they promised to do X and Y with their nuclear materials and limit enrichment”. The hilarious retort will inevitably be “these terms are weaker than the JCPOA”.
Unless everyone’s hiding the ball and Iran is giving up the uranium, basically any term possible is worse than status quo ante.
The party line will be “but they promised to do X and Y with their nuclear materials and limit enrichment”. The hilarious retort will inevitably be “these terms are weaker than the JCPOA”.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
We blockaded the SOH and Iran could not sell oil on the world market. And there was nothing Iran could do about it. You know why? Because we sank their fukn navy.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:38 pm to NC_Tigah
Now they want us in control of Iran! I thought it was Bibi
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:39 pm to NC_Tigah
What’s your take then?
We objectively did not do it, are you saying that we just chose not to? Because from a prestige and world opinion standpoint, that’s almost as bad as not being able to.
We objectively did not do it, are you saying that we just chose not to? Because from a prestige and world opinion standpoint, that’s almost as bad as not being able to.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:39 pm to DeBoar
We know you’re not very smart. I’d probably shut the frick up.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:40 pm to Adam Banks
quote:You and I are looking at very different "indications."
By all indications
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:41 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I’m trying to put together how any resolution here can be a win for the United States.
In theory a full nuclear ban I guess, but I wouldn't trust Iran to be truthful bout it
The #1 would be restrictions on trade with China, which would be the only way to really thwart Iran, IMHO and hurt China.
quote:
The hilarious retort will inevitably be “these terms are weaker than the JCPOA”.
But the $6B we are giving them won't be in cash
Posted on 5/23/26 at 6:42 pm to Indefatigable
quote:Asked and answered.
What’s your take then?
What do we get (demonstrate) by restraining exactly as we've done?
Popular
Back to top



1




