Started By
Message

Trump’s detailed plan to fix mail in ballots through the USPS

Posted on 5/31/26 at 7:48 pm
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
44433 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 7:48 pm

quote:

Most people have no idea what President Trump’s new election-mail Executive Order USPS rule actually does.

1. Plain English: it creates a chain-of-custody system for mail ballot envelopes in federal elections.

2. Not the vote, the envelope.

3. Under the proposed USPS rule, states using mail-in or absentee ballots for federal elections would have to use standardized ballot envelopes:

-Official Election Mail logo
-Automation-compatible design
-Unique Intelligent Mail barcode
-USPS review of envelope/barcode placement

4. That means the ballot envelope becomes trackable.

5. States or election mailers would also submit key data through a USPS portal:

-Voter name
-Voter address
-Outbound envelope barcode
-Return envelope barcode
-Originating election office state

6. So officials can know: this ballot envelope was sent out, and this return envelope came back.

7. USPS would review outbound ballot mail before accepting it.

-Is it in the right envelope?
-Does it have the proper barcode?
-Is it going to someone enrolled on that state’s mail-
ballot participation list?

8. If not, the mailing goes back to the election mailer to fix.

9. The broader Executive Order also directs DHS + SSA to help create State Citizenship Lists using federal citizenship, naturalization, SSA, SAVE, and related data.

10. Those lists go to state election officials before federal elections.

11. Important: states still run voter registration. The federal list does not register anyone by itself.

12. Bottom line: this is not “tracking your vote.”

13. It tracks the envelope, creates a sent-vs-returned audit trail, helps flag discrepancies, preserves ballot-envelope records, and leaves states responsible for their voter rolls.

14. Chain of custody is not suppression. It is basic election accountability.

15. I used “proposed rule” because USPS has not finalized the rule yet.

16. The proposal says it applies to general, special, and runoff federal elections, not primaries or UOCAVA military/overseas ballots, and it requires unique barcodes on outbound and return envelopes.

17. The rule would require voter name/address plus outbound and return envelope barcode data through a USPS portal, with updates allowed until the last day ballots may be mailed under state law.

18. It also says USPS does not alter voter eligibility or manage state voter rolls.

19. The EO separately directs DHS/SSA to create State Citizenship Lists and directs DOJ enforcement and five-year preservation of participation records, excluding cast ballots.

20. There is one more thing it does, all I'll say is, watch out ballot mills.


Posted by lurking
Member since Nov 2022
2927 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 7:49 pm to
I’m in favor of shutting down the USPS entirely instead. It would take Congress to accomplish that, so I’m aware it will never happen.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116580 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 7:50 pm to
This sounds pretty well thought out, and seems completely within the regulatory authority of the USPS
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
20844 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 7:52 pm to
That would be a fun jobs report.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99325 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 7:52 pm to
No wonder hes not concerned about the midtrrms
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83213 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 8:01 pm to
Checkmate
Posted by Onyx Aggie
Foothills of the Smokies
Member since Sep 2012
3115 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 8:09 pm to
It's awesome that he is doing this. It's sad that he has to because Congress won't get off of their arse and do their fricking job.
Posted by ForTheWin81
Member since Nov 2021
1762 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 8:24 pm to
It's be ome clear to me that there are alot of Republicans that would rather sale the idea that they're fighting than to actually win because the Save Act would absolutely be checkmate
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
24888 posts
Posted on 5/31/26 at 10:31 pm to
POTUS Trump is setting a new standard for POTUS accomplishments in the future. People who desire to be POTUS are pissed because now they will be required to make outstanding decisions and work hard as hell to Keep America Great Eternally (KAGE)!!
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
21932 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:17 am to
Any kind of election integrity measures you can bet Democrats are against it.
Posted by Tunasntigers92
The Boot
Member since Sep 2014
28303 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:19 am to
Yeah I'm sure he'll fix everything
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18877 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:24 am to
How soon before a woke judge stops it?

USPS has always been shady and inefficient. Was not a fan of the union for USPS workers coming out in support of biden in 2020. An election that had the largest amount of mail-in votes ever, had the employees responsible for delivering and receiving those mail-in votes supporting one of the candidates.


Some police unions supported Trump in 2020, if those officers were responsible for delivering and receiving ballots, we'd see judges stepping in and somehow putting temporary stops to that. We'd have seen msm talk about how it's impossible to have a secure a fair election if the entity responsible for delivering and receiving the ballots are in support for one of the candidates.

Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
12936 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 4:41 am to
It’s an Executive Order that can just be reversed by the next administration. This is meaningless.
Posted by RFK
Mar-a-Lago
Member since May 2012
3339 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 6:14 am to
Have to say I’m against anything that could suppress the ability to vote.

Groups that rely heavily on mail-in voting (rural voters, overseas/military, shift workers, people with mobility issues) face the most friction from any new requirement. Even small added hurdles reduce turnout.
Posted by hghlndk
Shreveport,louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
109 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 6:20 am to
Mail should run 5 days a week or even 4. Give them Wednesday off. If I ran a business that was losing massive amounts of money every year, I would change something. Common sense
Government makes me sick
Posted by tketaco
Sunnyside, Houston
Member since Jan 2010
21793 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 6:23 am to
I voted for this.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36707 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 6:28 am to
quote:

Have to say I’m against anything that could suppress the ability to vote. Groups that rely heavily on mail-in voting (rural voters, overseas/military, shift workers, people with mobility issues) face the most friction from any new requirement. Even small added hurdles reduce turnout.


Then you should be in favor of enhanced voter integrity since nothing suppresses the vote more than people thinking their vote won’t matter because it’s a rigged election due to mail fraud.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116580 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 6:31 am to
quote:

Even small added hurdles reduce turnout.


For a mail in ballot...

Where the onus is on the offices responsible for printing, issuing and receiving/counting ballots...

The involvement of the end user will not change:

Request mail in ballot
Receive mail in ballot
Complete mail in ballot
Place mail in ballot into envelope
Place mail in ballot into the mail...

Ah, wait... there it is... the voter has to request it. That is the daunting requirement that will reduce turnout.

For frick's sake...
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83213 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 6:32 am to
Voting security is not suppression.


And by the way, it wouldn't be needed if leftists policies hadn't transformed the U.S. into a low trust society.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57079 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 7:05 am to
quote:

It’s an Executive Order that can just be reversed by the next administration. This is meaningless.

It’s not meaningless if the theory - that democrats cheating is on such a large scale that they cannot win a national election without it - is correct. Implement this and democrats won’t be in a position to change the EO until they completely overhaul their party.

At least that’s the theory.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram