- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump will sign Executive Order Mandating Voter ID
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:15 pm to prplhze2000
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:15 pm to prplhze2000
quote:
Won't pass muster in Court.
Maybe if it only applies to federal elections.
0
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:15 pm to KCRoyalBlue
Such a common sense thing.
Glad to see DJT to do it and at the same time what a sad, ridiculous reflection of our country in the year 2025 that it takes an EO to implement a common sense measure.
Glad to see DJT to do it and at the same time what a sad, ridiculous reflection of our country in the year 2025 that it takes an EO to implement a common sense measure.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:18 pm to KCRoyalBlue
Another 80-20 brought to light by Orange the great
Dems will be screaming racism for all to see
Dems will be screaming racism for all to see
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:19 pm to TDTOM
quote:
This one is going to get interesting. Not sure it survives USSC.
They’ll have to explain why it’s necessary to show ID to check out a library book and board a plane if the USSC rules against.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:21 pm to HeadCall
quote:
I’m pretty sure that the states are free to conduct their elections the way they see fit.
Except that many blue states are not even following their own election laws
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:21 pm to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
Trump says he will order voter ID requirement for every vote
The president and his Republican allies also have made baseless claims about widespread voting by non-citizens, which is illegal and rarely occurs.
This is how this headline is read on reuters for instance. It's still indefensible; even if what youre saying is true, why would you care then?
Theres no argument you can formulate against it logically.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:24 pm to Jimbeaux
quote:
I think its obvious that certain election processes in one state can definitely affect the citizens of other states. I don’t even think that the vast majority of Americans even understand this wall of separation and assume that national elections are national in fact and in essence, and not processes of the individual states.
I think we SHOULD have one set of standards for voting in national elections.
I don't disagree, but that's not the system we have now, and a federal EO shouldn't be able to change the Constitution.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:24 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
Not a fan of transparency brah?
I'm a fan of the Constitution
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:25 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
What’s the remedy if a state has lax rules and even less oversight?
A Constitutional amendment or the voters of that state changing things via democratic action
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:26 pm to HeadCall
quote:
Congress should address it.
This is currently beyond even Congress.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:26 pm to Geauxldilocks
quote:
They’ll have to explain why it’s necessary to show ID to check out a library book and board a plane if the USSC rules against.
No. They won't. You're talking about 3 different systems are multiple levels of government.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:28 pm to KCRoyalBlue
Cool. Too bad we don't have a Congress that could actually pass legislation.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:28 pm to Geauxldilocks
quote:
They’ll have to explain why it’s necessary to show ID to check out a library book and board a plane if the USSC rules against.
Do you think they care? All those social/political/optics considerations are completely irrelevant. Legally, an EO won't stand up in court.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:28 pm to KCRoyalBlue
I doubt this will pass constitutional muster, but the system will work it out as designed.
It will do a lot to draw attention to the voting fraud issue, which is good.
It will do a lot to draw attention to the voting fraud issue, which is good.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:29 pm to TechBullDawg
quote:
Idea is to get it to the USSC?
Bingo.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:32 pm to Riverside
quote:
Slow is just popping off.
He asked a question that is going to have to be resolved.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:35 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:
Except that many blue states are not even following their own election laws
Red states that "miraculously went blue" didn't in 2020.
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:35 pm to KCRoyalBlue
The problem is we don’t have a single election. Technically speaking we have 51 elections that are then added up from there. Will need to go to the Supreme Court.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
A Constitutional amendment or the voters of that state changing things via democratic action
Therein lies the rub.... how can this be accomplished without verifying voters and ballots?
Posted on 8/31/25 at 2:36 pm to LegendInMyMind
No, he just tried to make a stupid “gotcha” argument. Federal elections should be subject to federal standards. It disenfranchises voters in conservative states that have voter ID requirements when blue states have zero election safeguards.
Page 2 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News