- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump responds back to Chief Justice John Roberts
Posted on 11/21/18 at 6:54 pm to Rex
Posted on 11/21/18 at 6:54 pm to Rex
quote:
Picking a fight with John Roberts to distract from the Invanka email scandal.
This place was at least bareable when you werne’t banned... Will be a great day when you are permanently gone.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 6:57 pm to Rex
quote:
distract from the Invanka email scandal.
what scandal son?
Posted on 11/21/18 at 7:01 pm to JQBama
quote:
Chief Justice John Roberts is and has been compromised AF.
I’m all for addressing perceived bias, or criticizing opinions that are rooted in political considerations rather than the laws of the United States. I heartily disagree with Chief Justice Roberts opinion in Sibelius.
However, the above quoted statement is patently retarded and a perfect example of the ignorance that our population has regarding the Supreme Court
Posted on 11/21/18 at 7:05 pm to JQBama
quote:
corrupt role in the FISA
Insofar as FISA itself is a corruption of the Constitution and the established values of the United States, I’ll concede this point.
However, if we are going to actually hold officials and judges accountable for our post 9-11 overactions and infringements on Liberty............ then you may as well impeach, investigate, or court martial all but 2 or 3 sitting SCOTUS justices, 1 or 2 former Justices, half of the sitting Congress, hundreds of former members of Congress, dozens and dozens of Cabinet level officials, hundred of military and intelligence personnel, two former Presidents and everyone who voted for any/all of the above.
This post was edited on 11/21/18 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 11/21/18 at 7:10 pm to cajunangelle
That might be the most dignified "GFY" ever tapped from the POTUS smart phone...
Bra-fing-vo Mr. President
Bra-fing-vo Mr. President
Posted on 11/21/18 at 7:11 pm to 225bred
quote:
per usual, he's spot on and correct.
He should toss is a question: where was the public rebuke of RBG for her comments?
Posted on 11/21/18 at 7:12 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
9-11 overactions and infringements on Liberty............ then you may as well impeach, investigate, or court martial all but 2 or 3 sitting SCOTUS justices, 1 or 2 former Justices, half of the sitting Congress, hundreds of former members of Congress,
When it comes to the point of border security...constitutionality established is "Congress can do whatever they want, this doc applies to the people prescribed"
Posted on 11/21/18 at 7:30 pm to Jude
quote:
Your hatred of him will burn brightly probably until the day you take your last breath. Sad....
It isn't sad, I love it.
These fricking assholes cannot get away from it.
I hated obama but I just ignored him.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 7:39 pm to bmy
Why? It obviously exists. That was proven in the last administration. All the way to the oval.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 7:44 pm to FalseProphet
quote:
This has to give some institutional sting to Roberts, and it might lead to the unintended result of Roberts going softer on the Ninth (though I doubt it).
If that happens wouldn't that prove Trump right and Roberts wrong?
Roberts really isn't the right person to be making the argument for an "independent" judiciary either. Considering the reports that he changed his opinion on Obamacare constitutionality based on Obama's public argument that to rule against Obamacare meant the courts had been politicized.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 7:48 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
he changed his opinion on Obamacare constitutionality based on Obama's public argument that to rule against Obamacare meant the courts had been politicized.
I said something very similar today to boosie today and he accused me of being a know nothing right wing hack who only reads fringe right wing blogs.
John Roberts has no business on the court when he's more concerned about making sure the court looks above the fray than actually ruling on what he knows is the correct course of action according to and only the law and constitution.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 7:52 pm to bmy
quote:
No thanks I reject the deep state agenda
Why would you reject it now? It would be like Rex going straight...it just doesn't compute.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 7:56 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
However, the above quoted statement is patently retarded and a perfect example of the ignorance that our population has regarding the Supreme Court
I am very happy that you and your well-educated intellect have cast my “opinion” as “patently retarded” and “a perfect example of the ignorance that our population has regarding the Supreme Court”.
Does CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS shite not stink? Regardless of accomplishment and TITLE, is this man beyond the reproach/standard expected from the rest of our populace? Your projection of Alinsky indoctrination is highly unbecoming. You may be a great person..I don’t know. Your response to my post is highly indicative of a lack of critical thought.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 8:14 pm to Rex
How do you type on a keyboard while wearing your dog outfit? I
Posted on 11/21/18 at 8:28 pm to Rex
quote:
Invanka email scandal.
Seriously, grasping at this nothingness is pathetic.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 8:43 pm to Rocco Lampone
quote:I don't know about that. All that hairspray may indeed be a fire hazard.
First of all, he (Trump) is not flammable.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:15 pm to cajunangelle
Roberts is bought or being coerced by Deep State
I’d be ok if he got McCain disease
I’d be ok if he got McCain disease
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:43 pm to cajunangelle
If you think Trump wrote this tweet you are naive.
This does not sound like him or things that he tweets.
It’s good that his communication department made this tweet instead of him
This does not sound like him or things that he tweets.
It’s good that his communication department made this tweet instead of him
This post was edited on 11/21/18 at 10:44 pm
Posted on 11/21/18 at 10:46 pm to LSURussian
I agree now.
I eta'd:
I eta'd:
quote:
I see now that I misinterpreted the Tweet. I initially and quickly read the people who are "charged with the safety and security of our country" as his appointees. I see now that isn't what he meant. I'm not good at Twittereese. Ignore me.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 11:35 pm to cajunangelle
Authoritarian Populism on display.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News