re: Trump posts doctored photo of the Obamas and AFOne with graffiti spray-painted on

quote:

---

No, but they are made to be criminal ghetto trash in yet another beneath the dignity of the office post by the current President.

---

Is promoting Marxism beneath the office of the presidentcy or is that ok?

quote:

---

Correct. Unless of course you are personally associating primate features or graffiti with one race, and not the other. I don't. Is that what you are doing?

---

No, I’m recognizing the historical trope being used. That is different from endorsing it, and you know that. There’s a difference between seeing the snake and putting it in the grass.

quote:

---

RCDfan1950“ Also, lie detectors do not read truth,”(quote CP). Is that really true, C? Why would LE employ Lie Detectors if so? And I’ve heard that future AI will indeed be able to read thoughts in telepathic ways. Also that UAP Aliens have interacted with Humans via telepathy. A YouTube video about a military helicopter pilot named Jake Barber is an interesting example of that. Re Trump: Trolling as a strategy to provoke his opposition into emotional and uncontrolled responses is one of his MOs. Also a way to employ outrage as a way of getting the public’s focus directed at an issue Think “they are rapists…”. Besides being pure public mockery of individuals whom he disrespects and senses are fake liars at their core. Note that he respects XI and Kim and Putin because they openly state their true intentions and beliefs. What fool believes Obama does that. At least Bernie is real.

---

Well, it’s true Bubba. Polygraphs don’t read truth. They measure stress signals: breathing, pulse, blood pressure, sweating. Law enforcement uses them as an interview tool, not because the machine has some sacred pipeline to reality. Nervous truthful people can fail. Calm liars can pass.

And “future AI mind-reading” is not evidence. Same with alien telepathy YouTube stories. Interesting campfire material, maybe. Not proof.

As for Trump, saying “he’s just trolling strategically” is not a defense. That’s just putting a little cowboy hat on childish behavior. If he posts fake race-bait garbage, the issue isn’t whether he made people mad. Any fool can kick over a bucket and call it strategy. And the bit about Trump respecting Xi, Kim, and Putin because they’re “real” is mighty revealing. Praising dictators for being honest about their intentions is not moral clarity. It’s just admiring the snake because it rattles first. So no bubba, we don’t need polygraphs, AI telepathy, aliens, or Putin psychology here.

Trump posted a fake image of the Obamas. It was obvious race-baiting. And y’all are trying to escape into UFO smoke because defending it straight sounds as ugly as it is.

Can’t meme, the Left

quote:

---

No. My argument is that racists perceive racial characteristics in the way that you apparently do. You're claim would be analogous to screeching about images of a Black murderer being transported between prisons in leg irons because it conjures historical images of slavery.

---

nope, that analogy doesn’t work, friend. A black criminal being transported in leg irons has an obvious law-enforcement context. Restraints during transport are a real procedure, whether anybody likes the optics or not. That is not the same thing as a doctored political image of the Obamas surrounded by graffiti, BLM, Arabic writing, and prior ape imagery. One is a custody procedure. The other is manufactured imagery where every ingredient was chosen.

That’s the difference you keep trying to step around.

Recognizing racial coding does not mean I “perceive racial characteristics” in people. It means I recognize how certain images have been used historically. If somebody hangs a noose, I don’t have to be racist to know it is not just “a piece of rope.”

Your argument keeps coming back to the same dodge: if someone understands the insult, they must secretly believe the insult. No. That dog limps Bubba. Not good to hunt.

The person using the trope owns the trope. The person pointing it out isn’t the problem. Pretending context doesn’t exist is not logic. It’s just hiding under the porch and calling it architecture.

quote:

---

Trump posted a fake image of the Obamas. It was obvious race-baiting

---

So, according to you, only black people spray graffiti?

quote:

---

your fake outrage

---

That is your entire post history, and it revolves entirely around Trump.

You are truly a scary person.

I could see you shooting hordes of innocent people simply because they voted for him.

Screw Obama and his husband

quote:

---

Is promoting Marxism beneath the office of the presidentcy or is that ok?

---

No it is not beneath the office of the presidency as it presents an alternate view of societal construction. (By the way, I say the same about those who propose fascism, let the ideas be brought up, let's discuss).

But what Trump did wasn't anything more than insulting Bro Culture garbage.