- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:23 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
They have been playing everyone
Especially their own who has been yelling for a week to shut up about it
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:23 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
They have been playing everyone
I had a little spark of hope this may be so... but was thrown off by the way it was played. I've never been more pleased to be wrong in my doubts.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:24 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:Classic case of Trump creating a problem and then celebrating the “fix” of the problem he created. His cult eats it up.
Why make your FBI and DOJ look like retards for two weeks? What was the point of the memo that it's a nothingburger?
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:24 pm to SallysHuman
Because grand jury testimony and evidence is generally sealed.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:25 pm to davyjones
quote:
If the judge refuses and it’s done anyway, that would be a violation of federal criminal law.
Is there any work around? I imagine there are a great many judges that wouldn't be eager to release this mess.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:25 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
I've never been more pleased to be wrong in my doubts.
Same
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:25 pm to cajuntiger1010
He said the files were a hoax. Which is it?
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:25 pm to Adam Banks
Adam, Trump is releasing Grand Jury testimony. It’s a transcript of people talking. It’s where the government presents its evidence of criminality and a group of people decide if there is probable cause to indict a person. There’s nothing to “alter,” other than redacting victim information.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:26 pm to Adam Banks
quote:It will never be enough for some of you.
So are the files altered or not?
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:26 pm to au4you
quote:
Classic case of Trump creating a problem and then celebrating the “fix” of the problem he created. His cult eats it up.
Fussing and whining whether he releases information or not….who didn’t see that coming!
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:26 pm to tigerinthebueche
quote:
The simpletons who are so invested in this will never be satisfied.
And the Trump supporters who would jump off a bridge if he asked them to are fricking morons.
You included.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:27 pm to SallysHuman
I guess the district court level could perhaps be appealed on up the ladder, but I’m not 100% sure about that. But that would be the only work around I could think of
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:28 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Are they altered or not?
They're supposed to be. That's what we have been told.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:28 pm to Bunk Moreland
There are others like Dersh that will be named. Dersh is sick of defending... Bill Richardson (D) is dead. Imagine Trumps meeting w/ King Charles in the UK in Sept. when Prince Andrews name is mentioned after Virginia ran into a bus and her husband beat her.
The former PM of Israel.
WJC probably begged Trump to stop it so he could die with a good name.
The former PM of Israel.
WJC probably begged Trump to stop it so he could die with a good name.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:29 pm to Bunk Moreland
Sure there was. Its called demand. You even have democrats demanding it be released.
It doesn't look like retribution. Its defense. "You left me no choice"
It doesn't look like retribution. Its defense. "You left me no choice"
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:30 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Why make your FBI and DOJ look like retards for two weeks?
“Tin foil hat”
He needed Dems to come out and say they wanted the records released and full transparency, so that meant telling Patel and Bondi something different.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:30 pm to cajuntiger1010
Hey, didn't he do this like the first week of after inauguration?? So what happened.
Downs doesn't matter. Anything pertinent will either be redacted or was burned long long ago.
Downs doesn't matter. Anything pertinent will either be redacted or was burned long long ago.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:31 pm to davyjones
quote:
I guess the district court level could perhaps be appealed on up the ladder, but I’m not 100% sure about that. But that would be the only work around I could think of
Will be interesting when:
The evidence presented to the GJ and also in GM’s trial doesn’t reconcile properly to what the FBI has in their possession.
This very well could’ve been a set up from the get go
That Orange bastard came through
Back to top


0









