- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump now has 136 national injunctions from Judges, last 7 Presidents had 60 total
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:30 am
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:30 am

Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:31 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
"Lawfare doesn't exist"
-SFP
-SFP
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:32 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Outrageous
Activist Judges - hang them all for creating their decisions from thin air
Activist Judges - hang them all for creating their decisions from thin air
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:35 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
But that shouldn't matter since Trump is a King/Dictator, right Libs?
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:36 am to PUB
quote:
Outrageous
Activist Judges - hang them all for creating their decisions from thin air
If the "law" was about justice and truth, then every nomination wouldn't be a war, at least for GOP nominees.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:37 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
What would Andrew Jackson do?
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:38 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Trump went in 312-226. They hate the will of the people
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:44 am to PUB
The supreme court has admonished and overruled them several times for these "national" injunctions.
I dont know why the executive branch does not just continue with the actions and say, we will stop if the supreme court rules, a lower court has no "national" standing.
And in cases like voter rolls not being handed over by the states, just cut every bit of their funding until they do. You have some demented judge there who ruled the rolls contain personal info like ss#. Thats right, they cant hand over the rolls to the federal govt.....who issues ss#....because the rolls contain ss#. That is just foolishness.
If cutting funding does not work, cut the internet, ground the airports via faa, and take them off the SWIFT banking system.
I dont know why the executive branch does not just continue with the actions and say, we will stop if the supreme court rules, a lower court has no "national" standing.
And in cases like voter rolls not being handed over by the states, just cut every bit of their funding until they do. You have some demented judge there who ruled the rolls contain personal info like ss#. Thats right, they cant hand over the rolls to the federal govt.....who issues ss#....because the rolls contain ss#. That is just foolishness.
If cutting funding does not work, cut the internet, ground the airports via faa, and take them off the SWIFT banking system.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:46 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Since SFP is banned, hopefully Powerman can explain the legal intricacies of this and how it is totally acceptable.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:47 am to 14&Counting
The SFP/boosie argument is that Trump pushes the envelope on everything from a legal standpoint, so more flags will be thrown.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:51 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
The smell of Swamp is strong
Posted on 8/12/26 at 8:30 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Fun fact: leftist interests filed legal actions to halt all but about a dozen DOGE cost cutting actions (over 100 legal actions). During the legal hold-up, dems took to the airwaves to declare DOGE a failure.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 8:31 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
SFP about to tell us how 7 other presidents combined just followed the constitution so much better. 
Popular
Back to top

9










