Started By
Message

Trump now has 136 national injunctions from Judges, last 7 Presidents had 60 total

Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:30 am
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
39988 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:30 am
Posted by 14&Counting
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2012
42624 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:31 am to
"Lawfare doesn't exist"

-SFP
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
21634 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:32 am to
Outrageous

Activist Judges - hang them all for creating their decisions from thin air
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
111256 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:35 am to
But that shouldn't matter since Trump is a King/Dictator, right Libs?
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
13352 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:36 am to
quote:

Outrageous

Activist Judges - hang them all for creating their decisions from thin air


If the "law" was about justice and truth, then every nomination wouldn't be a war, at least for GOP nominees.
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
6799 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:37 am to
What would Andrew Jackson do?
Posted by prouddawg
Member since Sep 2024
9856 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:38 am to
Trump went in 312-226. They hate the will of the people
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
21333 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:44 am to
The supreme court has admonished and overruled them several times for these "national" injunctions.

I dont know why the executive branch does not just continue with the actions and say, we will stop if the supreme court rules, a lower court has no "national" standing.

And in cases like voter rolls not being handed over by the states, just cut every bit of their funding until they do. You have some demented judge there who ruled the rolls contain personal info like ss#. Thats right, they cant hand over the rolls to the federal govt.....who issues ss#....because the rolls contain ss#. That is just foolishness.

If cutting funding does not work, cut the internet, ground the airports via faa, and take them off the SWIFT banking system.

Posted by BurlesonCountyAg
Member since Jan 2014
5486 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:46 am to
Since SFP is banned, hopefully Powerman can explain the legal intricacies of this and how it is totally acceptable.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
70957 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:47 am to
The SFP/boosie argument is that Trump pushes the envelope on everything from a legal standpoint, so more flags will be thrown.
Posted by Longdriver98
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Nov 2005
3787 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:51 am to
The smell of Swamp is strong
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48416 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 8:30 am to
Fun fact: leftist interests filed legal actions to halt all but about a dozen DOGE cost cutting actions (over 100 legal actions). During the legal hold-up, dems took to the airwaves to declare DOGE a failure.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11845 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 8:31 am to
SFP about to tell us how 7 other presidents combined just followed the constitution so much better.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
53003 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 9:11 am to
Those presidents, except maybe Reagan, were part of the problem. Trump exposed it all. That's why.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
53003 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Since SFP is banned
But, he single-handedly has kept the hamster wheels turning to keep this site powered up. What ever on earth will Chicken do?

Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
17347 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 9:44 am to
But but... that's cuz he's so "lawless," and such a "dictator!!!" REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!! Literally Hitler!!!!
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
17347 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 9:47 am to
quote:

The SFP/boosie argument is that Trump pushes the envelope on everything from a legal standpoint, so more flags will be thrown.


That's an absolutely retarded and dishonest argument.
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
37087 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Since SFP is banned,


When and why did this happen?
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
52296 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 10:08 am to
quote:

The SFP/boosie argument is that Trump pushes the envelope on everything from a legal standpoint, so more flags will be thrown.


Which is total bullshite.
Posted by prplngldtigr
just up da bayou from down
Member since Dec 2004
8395 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 10:12 am to
How many have been overturned by a higher court?


There must be consequences.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram