Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Trump now has 136 national injunctions from Judges, last 7 Presidents had 60 total

Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:30 am
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
39673 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:30 am
Posted by 14&Counting
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2012
42383 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:31 am to
"Lawfare doesn't exist"

-SFP
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
21074 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:32 am to
Outrageous

Activist Judges - hang them all for creating their decisions from thin air
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
110576 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:35 am to
But that shouldn't matter since Trump is a King/Dictator, right Libs?
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
12131 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:36 am to
quote:

Outrageous

Activist Judges - hang them all for creating their decisions from thin air


If the "law" was about justice and truth, then every nomination wouldn't be a war, at least for GOP nominees.
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
6706 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:37 am to
What would Andrew Jackson do?
Posted by prouddawg
Member since Sep 2024
9682 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:38 am to
Trump went in 312-226. They hate the will of the people
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
20721 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:44 am to
The supreme court has admonished and overruled them several times for these "national" injunctions.

I dont know why the executive branch does not just continue with the actions and say, we will stop if the supreme court rules, a lower court has no "national" standing.

And in cases like voter rolls not being handed over by the states, just cut every bit of their funding until they do. You have some demented judge there who ruled the rolls contain personal info like ss#. Thats right, they cant hand over the rolls to the federal govt.....who issues ss#....because the rolls contain ss#. That is just foolishness.

If cutting funding does not work, cut the internet, ground the airports via faa, and take them off the SWIFT banking system.

Posted by BurlesonCountyAg
Member since Jan 2014
5306 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:46 am to
Since SFP is banned, hopefully Powerman can explain the legal intricacies of this and how it is totally acceptable.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
69945 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:47 am to
The SFP/boosie argument is that Trump pushes the envelope on everything from a legal standpoint, so more flags will be thrown.
Posted by Longdriver98
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Nov 2005
3684 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 7:51 am to
The smell of Swamp is strong
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
48297 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 8:30 am to
Fun fact: leftist interests filed legal actions to halt all but about a dozen DOGE cost cutting actions (over 100 legal actions). During the legal hold-up, dems took to the airwaves to declare DOGE a failure.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11841 posts
Posted on 8/12/26 at 8:31 am to
SFP about to tell us how 7 other presidents combined just followed the constitution so much better.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram