Started By
Message

re: Trump has to deposit $455 million just to appeal the decision against him

Posted on 2/20/24 at 11:59 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422854 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 11:59 am to
quote:

Never seen SFP protest either.

Protest what, exactly?

quote:

He likes it I guess.

que!?
Posted by Leto II
Arrakis
Member since Dec 2018
21375 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

It continues to dismay me that zero democrats have spoken out against this ruling.

And why would we? He’s a criminal and so are his worthless sons.
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 12:01 pm
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19569 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:03 pm to
The idiot judge ran for office promising to "get Trump." So did the AG. That alone makes them criminals.

quote:

18 U.S.C. § 241

Conspiracy Against Rights

Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right.

Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act.

The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute. It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping aggravated sexual abuse, or resulted in death) in which case it may be punished by up to life imprisonment and, if death results, may be eligible for the death penalty.

Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct and Hate Crime Prosecutions. It was historically used, before conspiracy-specific trafficking statutes were adopted, in Human Trafficking prosecutions.



MISCONDUCT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT & OTHER GOVERNMENT ACTORS


18 U.S.C. § 242

Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus.

Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute.

Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others.
Posted by Floating Change Up
Member since Dec 2013
11859 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

’d try to claim MAL as worth that much to post the bond just to flip the bird.


You want a bird flip?

He needs to pull the money from a bond backed by Sberbank.


Heads would explode.
Posted by tigger4ever
Member since Apr 2021
635 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:08 pm to
We’re talking about Trump here not the Bidens. Keep up.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140571 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:08 pm to
You really want DAs campaigning on getting specific people?

I mean I’d like to see the entire Dem Congress be targeted like this if you are down.
Posted by jbdawgs03
Athens
Member since Oct 2017
9666 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:12 pm to
And you seem to be a groomer. Does your family know?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80290 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:14 pm to
you send that to Alina Habba yet? She’ll know just what to do with it.
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 12:14 pm
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64400 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

And why would we?


Well I know at least one Dim who's getting Ukraine money. Congrats I guess
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
7582 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

That alone makes them criminals.

Why do you think the MSM is already touting that "Trump is going to put all of his advisories in jail if he is elected (projected as if he were doing so like a dictator)"?
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 12:21 pm
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57272 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:22 pm to
How is such a law even Constitutional? What's next? Grandfather Clauses?
Posted by FLTech
the A
Member since Sep 2017
12529 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:22 pm to
Funny how Lina though trump wasn’t worth that much but yet they demand him to pay that much lol
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23744 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:22 pm to
EDIT: New York law may require a bond for the full amount. That’s a particularly harsh requirement. Too bad.
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 12:35 pm
Posted by Athis
Member since Aug 2016
11642 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:23 pm to
Is this up to the discretion of the court or is this a common practice?
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66961 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

common practice


In most states you have to post a bond to appeal a money judgment.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26831 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:33 pm to
4D Chess: Putin posts the bond
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
12656 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Penny change for Trump. He's the most richest, amazingly liquid, super duper katrillionaire there has ever been, ever. Should be no problem for him. Like a light lunch, if you will!


Liberals during Trump:

“We are losing our democracy!! The republic may not survive!! He is a dictator!!”


Liberals now: “Lawfare!! Yes!! Get him!! Attack him!! By any means!!! Tighten the screws!!!
Posted by TigerbaitTigerbait
Member since Aug 2016
420 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:38 pm to
November of 2024 can’t get here soon enough. Trump Win or loose (from dems cheating again ) I’m ready for $hit to hit the fan and have all this come to ahead . These dems will not stop until there is a total overhaul of corrupt Gov agencies.
Posted by tigersbh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
10289 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

It continues to dismay me that zero democrats have spoken out against this ruling.


And where is Tulsi Gabbard? She’s not even a Dem anymore. Has she even spoken out?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95914 posts
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:50 pm to
For the record, the 8th Amendment covers “excessive fines” and SCOTUS has held that it applies to the states, not just the Feds.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram