- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump gag order applies to campaign NOT a limited gag order a contempt trap for Team Trump
Posted on 10/18/23 at 9:39 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/18/23 at 9:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Our rights started eroding in the 70s and especially the 80s with respect to protection from LEO-Prosecutorial intervention. Incorrectly applying our constitutional concepts to cars was the start and the WOD was the killshot. That started in the 80s.
It all started with the popularity of the crime TV shows. Dragnet, Hawaii 5-O, etc...
0
Posted on 10/18/23 at 9:42 am to riccoar
quote:
And likley unconstitutional
Because it applies to others, not just Trump. It's so blatant that its more campaign realted than trial related.
Not to mention all of the cases against Trump are bogus.
Posted on 10/18/23 at 9:46 am to auggie
quote:
She would need proof and evidence
Posted on 10/18/23 at 9:48 am to TxRan2020
quote:
Judge wasn’t even born in America but she can tell our former president what he can and cannot do.
This BS needs to make a bee-line for the USSC. It is time sensitive and needs to be handled once and for all where it is destined to be addressed, but in a timely manner given the circumstances involved.
This post was edited on 10/18/23 at 9:49 am
Posted on 10/18/23 at 9:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
so specifically limiting commentary on Smith isn't a campaign issue, either.
Hahahahahahahahaaa......do you believe half the bullshite you post?
EVERYTHING about this trial is about stopping Trump, therefore, it's a campaign issue.
Posted on 10/18/23 at 9:54 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Weird that a gag order was issued for a dude who has less than a zero % chance of winning. Well according to MSM, Glenbots (formerly known as Ronbots) and progstains
They are just trying to ensure that Trump is the nominee. Did you forget that part?
Posted on 10/18/23 at 9:57 am to oogabooga68
quote:
EVERYTHING about this trial is about stopping Trump, therefore, it's a campaign issue.
So you're saying Trump supporters and potential Trump supporters would be too dumb to understand using "Biden's DOJ" and not "Jack Smith" specifically?
This post was edited on 10/18/23 at 9:57 am
Posted on 10/18/23 at 10:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So you're saying Trump supporters and potential Trump supporters would be too dumb to understand using "Biden's DOJ" and not "Jack Smith" specifically?
Wow you are truly an Autistic Fk.....
Posted on 10/18/23 at 10:09 am to oogabooga68
Imagine hiring that guy to rep you in court
Then finding out he has a million posts on a message board
Then finding out he has a million posts on a message board
Posted on 10/18/23 at 10:10 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Imagine hiring that guy to rep you in court
He is as "real" as Hank .
Posted on 10/18/23 at 11:21 am to stout
quote:
Election interference
By quite literal legal definition.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 9:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Our criminal justice system has been authoritarian for 40+ years.
Oh if only we could go back to the "authoritarianism" of 20 years ago. We could only hope actual rapists, looters, thieves, etc would resume actually going to jail for punishments that actually fit the crimes.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 9:33 am to cajunangelle
Directly after the portion you highlighted it outlines specific targets related to the case. Then goes on to explicitly maintain the defendant's right to criticize everyone. It's hilarious that it legit lists such specific narratives of the campaign. It's such weak language that is only used to inject into headlines.
State a "gag" order for everyone to debate on tv. Immediately follow with exceptions to protect the court legally. It's a sham.
State a "gag" order for everyone to debate on tv. Immediately follow with exceptions to protect the court legally. It's a sham.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 9:42 am to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
All gag orders are unconstitutional and Trump might be the person to test and break this anti-1st amendment judicial overreach.
A Constitutionalist will "gag" at such an order, hence the name.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News