Started By
Message

re: TRUMP FULLY ACQUITTED

Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:18 pm to
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
30948 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:18 pm to
They’re following up on a question he asked yesterday about when the President first ordered the hold.
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
23882 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:19 pm to
How would the Chief Justice know the name of the whistleblower in order to deny reading the question?
This post was edited on 1/30/20 at 12:20 pm
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
39822 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:19 pm to
Romney wanted the date the hold on aid was initiated. No one knew. Not that it really matters. Romney's just being his usual prick self.
Posted by Worx
Member since Jan 2020
249 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Exactly, he needs to say "I submit a question about the whistleblower Eric Ciaramella to the desk."


That may be what it already says!
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
166702 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:19 pm to
when men go that bald I think they should rogaine or shave it all off.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45871 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

How would the Chief Justice know the name of the whistleblower in order to deny reading the question?


Everyone knows who it is. You just cant say publicly who it is. Because reasons.

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
166702 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:20 pm to
Okay thanks. Romney is a prick.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
77860 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

when men go that bald I think they should rogaine or shave it all off.


I embraced it and shaved the rest. It's one less thing to worry about.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
39822 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:21 pm to
The only reason I can think Roberts would refuse to ask the question is that the Whistleblower is a potential witness.
This post was edited on 1/30/20 at 12:23 pm
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
166702 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:22 pm to
I could feel Rand Paul sigh when Roberts refused his WB question. He is pissed and obviously NOT intimidated by cuck Roberts.
This post was edited on 1/30/20 at 12:22 pm
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
93153 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:22 pm to
shiff is just sitting there with his fingers pinched against his right eye.

not a relaxed look.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
77860 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Everyone knows who it is. You just cant say publicly who it is. Because reasons.


Because then he could be called to testify and reveal the corruption Schiff orchestrated.
Posted by TigerProwl24
Gulf Coast
Member since May 2015
4440 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:22 pm to
The ONLY reason the House Managers don’t want the identity of the whistleblower to be known is NOT because of protection, but that it would open Pandora’s box and severely damage their case.

Everyone already knows who the whistleblower is! This is bullshite!
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
19563 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:23 pm to
OK, now I'm hearing witnesses may be called afterall. Can someone explain what the hell is going on?

Fox is saying the votes are now not there.

Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
84935 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

The only reason I can think Roberts would refuse to answer the question is that the Whistleblower is a potential witness.


But how does Roberts know who the whistleblower is? I mean Schiff doesn’t even know
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
41990 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:23 pm to
Where is Dersh? I didn't see him at the table.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
166702 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:25 pm to
That is silly because Biden's and Adam Schiff as witnesses names have been said...

Therefore the name must not be spoken, Roberts is a politically correct cuck that put the law secondary to political correctness BS, no?
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14977 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:26 pm to
Get ready for a lot of QPQ questions to the house managers today. This is there final hope to sway the 4 Recucklicans.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
19563 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

That is silly because Biden's and Adam Schiff as witnesses names have been said... Therefore the name must not be spoken, Roberts is a politically correct cuck that put the law secondary to political correctness BS


What was said?
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
39822 posts
Posted on 1/30/20 at 12:27 pm to
Paul could have asked for Schiff to explain his relationship with the Whistleblower. Roberts could view that as a potential question to witness Adam Schiff. Just a guess.
first pageprev pagePage 112 of 214Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram