- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump approval is pretty good.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:00 pm
8
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:01 pm to GumboPot
Trump has been crushing it lately. Hence all the melts by the TDS crowd.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:06 pm to GumboPot
And even WITH constant, undermining, negative and oppositional coverage and reporting.
Just imagine what the numbers WOULD be in a fair media universe.
Just imagine what the numbers WOULD be in a fair media universe.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:08 pm to SallysHuman
fair media universe.
Unpossible
Unpossible
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:08 pm to GumboPot
Pretty good? It’s amazing once you factor in 95% negative press.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:15 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Trump approval is pretty good.
"Wow. Trump approval at 53%, +7 today. Basically where he was on January 20th".
Well, about that...
LINK
There's also this. If it won't load, just go to the menu and pull up Trump's approval ratings. Rasmussen is an outlier.
LINK
This post was edited on 5/28/25 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:17 pm to GumboPot
citing rasmussen is no different than libs quoting the daily beast as proof
Posted on 5/28/25 at 12:19 pm to beaux duke
You mean like all those poles showing Harris going to win the election... those ethical and reputable polling
Board is becoming a haven for stupidity for a number of posters
Board is becoming a haven for stupidity for a number of posters
Posted on 5/28/25 at 1:01 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
There's also this. If it won't load, just go to the menu and pull up Trump's approval ratings. Rasmussen is an outlier.
Rasmussen was one of the the top 5 most accurate pollsters in the 2024 presidential election (and were one of the top ones in 2020 and 2016 as well).
The only other top 5 pollster I see that has had a job approval poll this month was the #2 most accurate pollster in the 2024 election (Insider Advantage...which I think may be teaming with Trafalgar, another top 5 pollster, for polling now). And Insider Advantage's poll showed a 55% job approval after Trump's visit to the Middle East.
There are a gazillion polls, but only a few seem to have been trustworthy in the last presidential election polling cycles.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 1:02 pm to GumboPot
Given the propaganda spewed by the media and entertainment industry, he’s doing very well.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 1:04 pm to GumboPot
Considering 40% of the country has incurable TDS, that is outstanding
Posted on 5/28/25 at 1:10 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Rasmussen is an outlier.
Wasn’t Rasmussen a top 3 pollster in 2024?
Atlas, Rasmussen, and Trafalger were all “outliers” right up until the votes were counted.
Pace yourself. You still have 3.5 more years to melt.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 1:11 pm to Rebel
quote:
Pretty good? It’s amazing once you factor in 95% negative press.
No one listens to the “mass media” anymore
It’s dead
Posted on 5/28/25 at 1:51 pm to Rebel
The self-owns from the TDS crowd are really something.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:14 pm to beaux duke
quote:
citing rasmussen is no different than libs quoting the daily beast as proof
Rasmussen picked Trump to win by 3.0 in 2024. Trump won by 1.5. A differential of 1.5.
But I guess you consider NPR or Marist to be more reputable who picked Trump to lose by 4.0. A differential of 5.5.
Rasmussen has been more accurate than the narrative shaping polls.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:17 pm to GumboPot
Why'd I know it was Rassmussen before I opened the thread?
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:19 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Rasmussen picked Trump to win by 3.0 in 2024. Trump won by 1.5. A differential of 1.5.
But I guess you consider NPR or Marist to be more reputable who picked Trump to lose by 4.0. A differential of 5.5.
Rasmussen has been more accurate than the narrative shaping polls
This is meaningless unless you reference their entire body of work vs actual results. Picking a night or two out of a whole season when some guy shot the lights out doesn't mean he's a great shooter.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:19 pm to Rebel
quote:
Wasn’t Rasmussen a top 3 pollster in 2024?
Atlas Intel, Rasmussen, WSJ, Fox News, and CNBC were the only polls that had Trump wining in 2024.
Rasmussen and Atlas Intel were the only pollsters that consistently had Trump winning. WSJ, Fox News and CNBC only showed Trump winning in their last polls before the election.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:25 pm to mwade91383
quote:
This is meaningless unless you reference their entire body of work vs actual results.
Rasmussen and Atlas Intel pre-election polling consistently showed Trump winning versus either Biden or Kamala.
You can always follow Ann Selzer polling if it makes you feel better.
Posted on 5/28/25 at 2:30 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Rasmussen and Atlas Intel pre-election polling consistently showed Trump winning versus either Biden or Kamala.
You're doing it again, you're talking about one election. And there's no way to fact check pre election polls beforehand, especially weeks or months before voting (as in, the actual results to be measured against).
I don't think you fundamentally understand the valid criticism of Rassmussen polling. You need to zoom out a lot more.
This post was edited on 5/28/25 at 2:31 pm
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News