Started By
Message

re: Trump and His Associates Had More Than 100 Contacts With Russians Before the Inauguration

Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:35 am to
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:35 am to
quote:

How in the frick does anyone with even a remote amount of intelligence not understand how absurdly small "100 contacts" is using that standard?



You would expect Flynn to have 100s if not 1000s of contacts with Russians and other foreign dignitaries. Why?

THAT WAS HIS frickING JOB!
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Well Has anyone been busted for collusion?


Has the investigation ended yet?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59473 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:35 am to
quote:

PROCESS CRIMES!!11!11!


Well there was one for tax evasion for the years manafort worked with the Podestas. Still...zero regarding collusion with Russia.
This post was edited on 1/26/19 at 10:36 am
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:36 am to
quote:

You can’t deny there is some smoke here.


There you go lying again because you know that 100 number is absurdly low and you know that it likely describes every person who has ever run for or won the Presidency for the last 50 years.

You avoiding certain uncomfortable posts is another method by which you lie.

Because, well. You're not a good person.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Has the investigation ended yet?
He listed all those indictments as if they were a rebuttal on the collusion point.

Clearly, they aren't because NONE of them are related to collusion.

Again. I know you know this but you think you're being slick. Look. I get it. Juries are typically populated by idiots and you're used to your dishonest approach working.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59473 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:38 am to
quote:

You can’t deny there is some smoke here.


I would say that 100 “contacts” over a two year period is exculpatory. You choose to think it’s evidence of wrongdoing.
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6474 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:39 am to
You’re a hypocrite..... <—— my point.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63498 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:40 am to
quote:

I actually don’t know that
Classic. Nothing better than using one’s own lack of evidence as proof something happened.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:40 am to
quote:

You would expect Flynn to have 100s if not 1000s of contacts with Russians and other foreign dignitaries. Why?

THAT WAS HIS frickING JOB!



I agree, so it begs the question on why he lied about those contacts when asked by the FBI.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:40 am to
quote:

You choose to think it’s evidence of wrongdoing.


I don’t know that I would go quite that far, but it is worthy of further investigation and smearing Robert Muller like Republicans have done just make it appear a) Trump really does have something to hide and b) conservatives care more about party than country
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85115 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Trump and His Associates Had More Than 100 Contacts With Russians Before the Inauguration


Soooo, should be pretty fricking easy to show collusion with this much information out there, right???


Well, guess not since its almost 2yrs into Muellers bullshite and they haven't indicted a single person for collusion.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:41 am to
quote:

as proof something happened


Have I asserted proof?
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
88509 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:41 am to
quote:

its almost 2yrs into


Big investigations take a long time
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
8053 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:42 am to
another out from under the rock and into the sunshine trumpkin spreading his wisdom on us poor democrats. Nancy P.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85115 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Big investigations take a long time


Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59473 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Trump really does have something to hide and b) conservatives care more about party than country


The amount of process crimes and lack of anything substantive should be a huge red flag that this is an investigation based on politics..not evidence of an actual crime. That should scare you. It is most definitely not what this country stands for.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62080 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Big investigations take a long time


So you are holding out hope that Mueller has some last second ace in the hole findings?
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28172 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:44 am to
Pathetic.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59473 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:44 am to
quote:

nother out from under the rock and into the sunshine trumpkin spreading his wisdom on us poor democrats. Nancy P.


I specifically said You were the village idiot posting an emotional diatribe without any basis in fact. Not all democrats. You, specifically.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98250 posts
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:44 am to
9 pages and Drac Sanctions still wont answer the question

Shorty was 100% right
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram