- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump and His Associates Had More Than 100 Contacts With Russians Before the Inauguration
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:27 am to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:27 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:Well. I don't consider you stupid so, I know that you know everything I type below this is true. Yet, you posted the OP.
What am I trying to put forth?
quote:
I have to be honest here and say that I'm actually kinda stunned the number is 100 and not 1000.
I mean hell. Let's pretend we're just talking about 10 total member of a campaign. AND...…….we're going to include not only contacts initiated by those 10, but contacts initiated by ANY CITIZEN of the other nation also!
How the frick is that only 100?
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:27 am to BBONDS25
Pap in London, trump invite to a party in Moscow,
Don’t wanna dig them all up...
Trump tower meeting ...
Lots were in transition too and some weren’t even with Russians soooo ya it’s a joke
Don’t wanna dig them all up...
Trump tower meeting ...
Lots were in transition too and some weren’t even with Russians soooo ya it’s a joke
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:29 am to Draconian Sanctions
So is that illegal to talk to people?
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:29 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Didn’t happen. And you know it.
I actually don’t know that
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:29 am to GumboPot
quote:
The NYTs listed 28 Team Trump memebers t
TWENTY EIGHT!
I mean. Holy frick.
And they included contacts in EITHER direction.
And even then, tons of what they listed is hilariously nothing.
How in the frick does anyone with even a remote amount of intelligence not understand how absurdly small "100 contacts" is using that standard?
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:29 am to ShortyRob
This pretty much vindicates Trump haha
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:30 am to Canada_Baw
quote:
This pretty much vindicates Trump haha
I figure if I was a top member of Trump's team, I probably would have reason to reach out and learn more about my potential Russian counterparts at least 100 times on my fricking own!!
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:31 am to ShortyRob
quote:He’s challenging Toddy for the PT Most Gullible award. This is a good entry. He’s making a good case for himself.
Well. I don't consider you stupid so, I know that you know everything I type below this is true. Yet, you posted the OP.
This post was edited on 1/26/19 at 10:32 am
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:31 am to rattlebucket
quote:
Its funny how Dems keep running this russian narrative
Yeah, 90 indictments as a result of the investigation is a dead end narrative for sure.
PROCESS CRIMES!!11!11!
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:31 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
actually don’t know that
That’s because you really want it to be true. Not because of any objective facts. I mean...you speculate about tax returns. What a joke.
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:32 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
He’s challenging Toddy for the PT Most Gullible award. This is a good entry. He’s making a good case for himself.
100 contacts.
By 28 people.
Over the course of a fricking year!
And they INDIVIDUALLY counted contact in EITHER direction.
I mean holy frick DS should be embarrassed. (As should the writer)
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:33 am to The Spleen
quote:Well
Yeah, 90 indictments as a result of the investigation is a dead end narrative for sure. PROCESS CRIMES!!11!11!
Has anyone been busted for collusion?
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:33 am to ShortyRob
quote:
How in the frick does anyone with even a remote amount of intelligence not understand how absurdly small "100 contacts" is using that standard?
And crickets about Hillary hiring Glenn Simpson to dig up dirt on Trump from the Russian GRU.
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:33 am to ShortyRob
quote:
Over the course of a fricking year!
2 years
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:34 am to GumboPot
quote:
And crickets about Hillary hiring Glenn Simpson to dig up dirt on Trump from the Russian GRU.
THe reality is, you can probably write this story about EVERY frickING PERSON WHO HAS RUN FOR PRESIDENT IN THE LAST 50 frickIN YEARS!!!!
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:34 am to Draconian Sanctions
I guess you haven't learned on this board you can't say anything that looks like the truth against bonespurs. his minnions will not allow it. just remind them that Nancy P has his balls in her purse.
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:34 am to BBONDS25
quote:
That’s because you really want it to be true.
No I actually don’t want it to be true. You can’t deny there is some smoke here. Whether or not there’s fire is TBD.
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:34 am to Canada_Baw
It looks like they are mixing Ukrainians in with Russians.
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:35 am to Bunyan
quote:I stand corrected.
2 years
OP is even more absurd than I thought.
Posted on 1/26/19 at 10:35 am to 56lsu
quote:
guess you haven't learned on this board you can't say anything that looks like the truth against bonespurs. his minnions will not allow it. just remind them that Nancy P has his balls in her purse
Another non-fact based emotional post from the village idiot.
Popular
Back to top


1




