- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Admin tells Boasberg they are no longer playing his game
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:51 am to lake chuck fan
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:51 am to lake chuck fan
quote:What would a pardon do?quote:I understand the sentiment, I really do
Ignore all of them and pardon the cabinet. That's certainly an option I would consider. Seriously
I am not aware of any pending or threatened criminal charges against the Cabinet.
5
Posted on 3/25/25 at 9:52 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I am not aware of any pending or threatened criminal charges against the Cabinet.
Those aren't needed Joey.Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:02 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
I really do, but that's probably not the best response YET.
Yep, they want him to ignore them and walk into the trap.
Trump has said he will fight in the courts and he needs to push to expedite all cases.
Get rulings and go from there.
In the mean time, draw the countries attention to the BS the judges are pulling. He will garner more and more support. Dems just don't get it.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:07 am to Decatur
quote:
Flight times are state secrets now nice Someone should tell Flightaware.
They are if the president deems them to be.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:10 am to Jbird
quote:You are babbling again. Probably a result of your complete lack of understanding of the Constitution in general and the pardon power in particular.quote:Those aren't needed Joey.
I am not aware of any pending or threatened criminal charges against the Cabinet.
Yes, Trump, please go ahead and "pardon" the entire Cabinet. There, they are now immune from criminal prosecution.
But doing that will not do ANYTHING to prevent action by either the Legislative or Judicial branches to ensure that you and your cronies do not violate the Constitution.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:11 am to Decatur
quote:
Flight times are state secrets now nice
State secrets are the prerogative of the executive branch, aren't they? The judicial branch can't rule on whether or not something is a state secret, because they would then know what the state secret is
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:12 am to AggieHank86
quote:
You are babbling again. Probably a result of your complete lack of understanding of the Constitution in general and the pardon power in particular. Yes, Trump, please go ahead and "pardon" the entire Cabinet. There, they are now immune from criminal prosecution. But doing that will not do ANYTHING to prevent action by either the Legislative or Judicial branches to ensure that you and your cronies do not violate the Constitution.
Nice melt, Hank.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:13 am to AggieHank86
quote:
But doing that will not do ANYTHING to prevent action by either the Legislative or Judicial branches to ensure that you and your cronies do not violate the Constitution.
How are they violating the Constitution?
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:16 am to AggieHank86
Joey did blanket pardons for a decade or so for his family. 
Now you gaf about the Constitution.
Now you gaf about the Constitution.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:17 am to AggieHank86
Yes indeed. Quick! Call that branch that enforces all that stuff!!! Oh...Wait......
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:21 am to stout
Suddenly now they decide aren't "playing" Boasberg's game??
Is this just Misdirection?
But from what?
* $500 BILLION allocated to a giant AI Data Center with its own power plants (Is anyone from the supposed "alt-Right media" ever going to ask why this so important that it was a Day-One priority??)
* Renewed calls for a North American Union (Is Trump attempting to set it up this ridiculous rhetoric of a takeover Canada and Greenland?)
* The sudden "invitation" from King Chas for the US to be part of the British Commonwealth (and Trump saying, "yeah, sounds cool!")
* The sudden and conspicuous hawkish US policy in the Middle East
* The bogus release of the Epstein Files
* The sudden vandalism of Teslas and hate of Elon
* The sudden hardline "antisemitism" policies coming even from HHS and RFK Jr.
Let's start being more aware of being played and actual non-MAGA agendas.
Is this just Misdirection?
But from what?
* $500 BILLION allocated to a giant AI Data Center with its own power plants (Is anyone from the supposed "alt-Right media" ever going to ask why this so important that it was a Day-One priority??)
* Renewed calls for a North American Union (Is Trump attempting to set it up this ridiculous rhetoric of a takeover Canada and Greenland?)
* The sudden "invitation" from King Chas for the US to be part of the British Commonwealth (and Trump saying, "yeah, sounds cool!")
* The sudden and conspicuous hawkish US policy in the Middle East
* The bogus release of the Epstein Files
* The sudden vandalism of Teslas and hate of Elon
* The sudden hardline "antisemitism" policies coming even from HHS and RFK Jr.
Let's start being more aware of being played and actual non-MAGA agendas.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:25 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
DOJ has 10,000 lawyers and are in the process of hiring 1,000 more to specifically deal with these rogue judges.
Really?
According to whom?
Why is the admin DoJ even humoring Boasberg to begin with?
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:30 am to Jbird
quote:This is so incoherently off-point that it truly boggles the mind.
Joey did blanket pardons for a decade or so for his family.
Now you gaf about the Constitution
Whether a Biden pardon (or a Trump pardon, for that matter) is APPROPRIATE is utterly IRRELEVANT to the question of whether such a pardon would somehow validate otherwise unconstitutional actions. The pardon means (only) that there can be no (federal) criminal prosecution.
As to the Biden pardons, many of them probably WERE inappropriate. That can be said of MOST final-days slates of presidential pardons, for the last century or longer. There is ALWAYS cronyism in that batch, even if Biden's were probably more egregious than most.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:33 am to Epic Cajun
quote:
State secrets are the prerogative of the executive branch, aren't they? The judicial branch can't rule on whether or not something is a state secret, because they would then know what the state secret is
no, the judicial branch absolutely can rule on if something is a state secret.
BUT it is worth noting that the Judge asked them to either disclose the information or formally invoke the state secret privilege, which they are finally doing.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:33 am to AggieHank86
Babble on Wayne!
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:34 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
Suddenly now they decide aren't "playing" Boasberg's game??
By any chance, are your parents siblings?
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:35 am to SammyTiger
quote:
no, the judicial branch absolutely can rule on if something is a state secret.
They can rule on whether the privilege was properly invoked. Since you’re such a fan of clarity, I thought you appreciate an accurate answer.
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:40 am to BBONDS25
quote:
They can rule on whether the privilege was properly invoked.
I hope you have found a job where you don’t have to give legal advice.
“ The court itself must determine whether the circumstances are appropriate for the claim of privilege, and yet do so without forcing a disclosure of the very thing the privilege is designed to protect.”
US v Reynolds
For Clarity.
This post was edited on 3/25/25 at 10:43 am
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:40 am to stout
Can you refute any ongoing policies that are actually anti-MAGA? Or are you just going to continue to run interference for the bizarre priorities of this admin?
Posted on 3/25/25 at 10:41 am to BBONDS25
Kagan also commented on nationwide injunctions from district courts and “forum shopping” — or the ability to go to a district court that may provide a favorable outcome. Noting that these issues happened across political administrations, Kagan said that one court shouldn’t be able to subvert the policy decisions of an administration.
“It just can't be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stopped for the years that it takes to go through the normal process,” Kagan said.
LINK
“It just can't be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stopped for the years that it takes to go through the normal process,” Kagan said.
LINK
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News