Started By
Message
locked post

To those who say you can’t compare CV19 to H1N1

Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:21 pm
Posted by RidiculousHype
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2007
10187 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:21 pm
If, at the end of this, US deaths end up less than H1N1 (roughly 12,000) then wouldn’t that be a massive success? We keep hearing this is so much worse than H1N1, which justifies the closures, panic, etc. But if we end up at say 5,000 deaths, then what?

FTR we are at 500 right now.
Posted by Sput
Member since Mar 2020
7882 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:23 pm to
You can’t compare since H1N1 was way worse
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162190 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

You can’t compare since H1N1 was way worse

Too early to say that

Based on the early numbers the death rate seems to be much higher for CV19

quote:

In the U.S., between April 2009 and April 2010, the CDC estimates there were 60.8 million cases of swine flu, with over 274,000 hospitalizations and nearly 12,500 deaths — that's a mortality rate of about 0.02%
Posted by RebelExpress38
In your base, killin your dudes
Member since Apr 2012
13491 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:31 pm to
Have you not heard? Scientists unanimously agree millions will die, we have to shut down the economy. If it saves one life it’ll be worth it.
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6495 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:32 pm to
US deaths from COVID19 will be dramatically lower than H1N1. Wuhan virus has below 1000 deaths after 4-5 months (we’ve only been testing for 1-2 months the virus has been here longer than we began testing.)

H1n1 over 12k deaths in 13 months. Will be ~2x higher than wuhan virus death toll.
Posted by Argonaut
Member since Nov 2015
2059 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

wouldn’t that be a massive success?


Yes. I'm glad we didn't ignore it and hope it would go away because people were stupid enough to compare this to the common flu.
Posted by RidiculousHype
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2007
10187 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

US deaths from COVID19 will be dramatically lower than H1N1. Wuhan virus has below 1000 deaths after 4-5 months (we’ve only been testing for 1-2 months the virus has been here longer than we began testing.)

H1n1 over 12k deaths in 13 months. Will be ~2x higher than wuhan virus death toll.


If this is correct, how can anyone justify the media’s coverage of, and government response to this?
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35361 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:35 pm to
Hard to say. The southern US and Mexico were the epicenter of H1N1 and it was widespread before it was discovered. With CV19 we had several weeks notice and could have accepted tests before community spread happened.

However, CV19 is far more deadly and being above 500 deaths now tells me that holding this to 5k deaths may be just wishful thinking at this point.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69243 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

we had several weeks notice and could have accepted tests before community spread happened.


Accepted tests from whom?
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6495 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

Based on the early numbers the death rate seems to be much higher for CV19


Based off comparatively small sample collections from primarily the most ill and severely affected. misrepresents the data. If they only tested The severely ill, dying or famous folks during h1n1 wed see much higher death % much like with wuhan virus.
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6495 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:40 pm to
quote:


If this is correct, how can anyone justify the media’s coverage of, and government response to this?


Can’t justify the media wont try.

But the government response ‘may be justified’ if true. I’m sure the death toll would be much higher if social distancing and shut downs were not implemented. An excessive gov response definitely impacts the damage of the virus. If we did similar actions for h1n1 the death toll would be lower too, much like any infectious disease would.
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14947 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

If it saves one life it’ll be worth it.
But it won't save one campaign in particular.

Posted by tagatose
South Carolina
Member since Oct 2005
2007 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

Have you not heard? Scientists unanimously agree millions will die


Are these the same 97% global warming scientists?
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14158 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:48 pm to
I think it will be worse if we don’t develop a treatment. But not by a huge factor.
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
19669 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

In the U.S., between April 2009 and April 2010, the CDC estimates there were 60.8 million cases of swine flu, with over 274,000 hospitalizations and nearly 12,500 deaths — that's a mortality rate of about 0.02%


Here is what is not mentioned in the swine flu and regular flu numbers. They have gone through correction for uncounted cases based on computer models of their viral behavior. The corona virus numbers are all just raw data at this point because there is not enough info on it yet
Posted by 1609tiger
Member since Feb 2011
3220 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 9:59 pm to
The viruses will actually turn out to be similar with one BIG difference. The swine flu attacked young people way more than the elderly. That may have been the virus or something in the immune system of older Americans. CV19 doesn’t have that trait. Obviously more older people sick, more deaths. At the end of the day THATs the morality difference nothing else.
Posted by Chef Free Gold Bloom
Wherever I’m needed
Member since Dec 2019
1364 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 10:00 pm to
Exponential growth patterns actually prove that Over 10 million will be dead before April is over
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

Based on the early numbers the death rate seems to be much higher for CV19



because you have ALL the fricking data for one and not for the other one
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

the death rate seems to be much higher for CV19
misleading. most 19 patients are asymptomatic. we don't even know the total number of infected patients.
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 3/23/20 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

people were stupid enough to compare this to the common flu
so far, that is a dumb comparison. seasonal flu is way way wayyyyy worse at this point
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram