- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tina Peters data- 29k election records deleted or altered…
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:13 pm to beaux duke
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:13 pm to beaux duke
quote:
i hope you enjoy your celebration friend, i truly do let me know when anything happens with your list above. oh, and tina peters
Love the back flips!! Keep ‘em coming… hahhahahahahahahahaha
1
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:19 pm to Placekicker
quote:
Love the back flips!! Keep ‘em coming… hahhahahahahahahahaha
i'm sorry you can't find any evidence to post about your insane tina peters claims
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:48 am to SlowFlowPro
The point is she proved there was fraud. And you know she did. But you can never admit that part and want to attack the methods.
Regardless of how she felt she needed to accomplish getting the evidence, fraud was proven.
Regardless of how she felt she needed to accomplish getting the evidence, fraud was proven.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why not keep the data herself?
You're gonna have to do better than that Fast Stagnant Amateur. I would think any attempt to save government data on private servers and computers is highly illegal.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:05 am to Placekicker
Some jagoff posts something on X that confirms your worldview and you run with it .
Trump did not win Colorado in 2020 and a Republican DA prosecuted her for breaking the law
Trump did not win Colorado in 2020 and a Republican DA prosecuted her for breaking the law
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:23 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Trump did not win Colorado in 2020 and a Republican DA prosecuted her for exposing their fraud
FIFY…
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:32 am to Louisianalabguy
quote:
I would think any attempt to save government data on private servers and computers is highly illegal.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:35 am to Vacherie Saint
Exactly
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:36 am to Louisianalabguy
quote:
I would think any attempt to save government data on private servers and computers is highly illegal.
Which is literal evidence of why she was convicted
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Exactly
Peters got 9 years.
How long was Clinton's sentence?
"SloFlowPro thinks nobody is above the law"
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:38 am to moneyg
Clinton should have been prosecuted. You agree these are criminal actions for both parties, too.
That's the relevant commentary.
That's the relevant commentary.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Clinton should have been prosecuted. You agree these are criminal actions for both parties, too.
There's nefarious intent/activity attached to Clinton's actions. And,then she decided to destroy the evidence.
For Peters, it's the opposite. She wanted to expose the data to the public. She wasn't selling the info. She wasn't using it for her own purposes. And, she didn't hide the fact that she exposed it. She did it all in the open.
Equating the two is very revealing.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:46 am to moneyg
quote:
There's nefarious intent/activity attached to Clinton's actions. And,then she decided to destroy the evidence.
There is nefarious intent from Peters, too.
Instead of destroying the records she did an equally illegal act by giving the data to an unauthorized third party.
So both intentionally violated the law and then intentionally violated it again.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The 315k clerical error did nothing to change the outcome of the election, though.
Just to make sure we are in the same page - is it your statement that if the 315,000 votes were all done for the democrat that the election result in Georgia would not have changed if completely removed from the system?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:47 am to moneyg
quote:
Equating the two is very revealing
Trying to differentiate them by ignoring the facts about one is more revealing
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:49 am to dafif
quote:
is it your statement that if the 315,000 votes were all done for the democrat that the election result in Georgia would not have changed if completely removed from the system?
My comment isn't referencing their "complete removal" and just the validity of the votes themselves. Those were 315k valid, legal votes.
The issue is that a clerical error created a theoretical path for them to be removed based on a formalistic-legal technicality having nothing to do with fraud.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 9:52 am
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The 315k clerical error did nothing to change the outcome of the election, though.
Bra....do you really believe the cheating, i mean "clerical errors", was confined to Fulton county alone?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:52 am to BugAC
quote:
do you really believe the cheating, i mean "clerical errors"
This is the fruit of the dishonesty.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:54 am to BugAC
He a dishonest POS who just comes here to stir the pot. It is all he has in life apparently
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:57 am to beaux duke
quote:
beaux duke
frick off commie!
Page 10 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News